Aesthetic Experiences Across Cultures: Neural Correlates When Viewing Traditional Eastern or Western Landscape Paintings.
Eastern paintings
Western painting
aesthetics
beauty
cultural identity
fMRI
visual perception
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
28
02
2018
accepted:
25
03
2019
entrez:
7
5
2019
pubmed:
7
5
2019
medline:
7
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Compared with traditional Western landscape paintings, Chinese traditional landscape paintings usually apply a reversed-geometric perspective and concentrate more on contextual information. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we discovered an intracultural bias in the aesthetic appreciation of Western and Eastern traditional landscape paintings in European and Chinese participants. When viewing Western and Eastern landscape paintings in an fMRI scanner, participants showed stronger brain activation to artistic expressions from their own culture. Europeans showed greater activation in visual and sensory-motor brain areas, regions in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and hippocampus when viewing Western compared to Eastern landscape paintings. Chinese participants exhibited greater neural activity in the medial and inferior occipital cortex and regions of the superior parietal lobule in response to Eastern compared to Western landscape paintings. On the behavioral level, the aesthetic judgments also differed between Western and Chinese participants when viewing landscape paintings from different cultures; Western participants showed for instance higher valence values when viewing Western landscapes, while Chinese participants did not show this effect when viewing Chinese landscapes. In general, our findings offer differentiated support for a cultural modulation at the behavioral level and in the neural architecture for high-level aesthetic appreciation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31057452
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00798
pmc: PMC6478896
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
798Références
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jan;2(1):51-61
pubmed: 11253359
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S103-9
pubmed: 11373140
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1699-705
pubmed: 15010496
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Nov;14(11):1256-65
pubmed: 15192010
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:649-77
pubmed: 15217346
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):988-99
pubmed: 15298786
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Mar;8(3):102-7
pubmed: 15301749
Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508
pubmed: 15527534
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):440-57
pubmed: 16466680
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57
pubmed: 17188554
Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):393-5
pubmed: 17234951
Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):334-42
pubmed: 17239621
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 May;11(5):197-203
pubmed: 17347026
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:123-52
pubmed: 17417939
Brain Res. 2007 Aug 29;1166:77-91
pubmed: 17655831
Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1083-90; discussion 1097-9
pubmed: 17719799
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Feb;30(2):532-40
pubmed: 18095279
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Aug;9(8):646-54
pubmed: 18641669
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jan;22(1):97-108
pubmed: 19199419
Brain Cogn. 2009 Jun;70(1):84-91
pubmed: 19223099
Neuropsychology. 2009 Mar;23(2):135-43
pubmed: 19254086
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(3):197-211
pubmed: 19424905
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8719-24
pubmed: 19433790
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):682-7
pubmed: 19828312
J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 25;29(47):14980-6
pubmed: 19940193
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;23(1):53-62
pubmed: 20175677
Neuron. 2010 Feb 25;65(4):550-62
pubmed: 20188659
Brain Cogn. 2011 Jun;76(1):172-83
pubmed: 21334125
Biol Psychol. 2012 Jul;90(3):202-10
pubmed: 22459338
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 20;6:66
pubmed: 22529785
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:77-107
pubmed: 23020642
Perception. 2012;41(5):569-76
pubmed: 23025160
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:288-92
pubmed: 23123681
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):181-204
pubmed: 23663408
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Aug 26;548:239-43
pubmed: 23752131
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 18;110 Suppl 2:10454-61
pubmed: 23754437
Brain Cogn. 2014 Jun;87:52-6
pubmed: 24704947
Brain Cogn. 2014 Jun;87:104-8
pubmed: 24732954
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;18(7):370-5
pubmed: 24768244
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 07;8:478
pubmed: 25071508
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 19;5:1038
pubmed: 25285084
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 17;9:80
pubmed: 25741273
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 28;9:218
pubmed: 25972799
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 13;9:528
pubmed: 26528161
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Jan;60:65-71
pubmed: 26619805
Psych J. 2015 Dec;4(4):199-207
pubmed: 26663626
Psych J. 2015 Dec;4(4):243-54
pubmed: 26663630
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;11(2):265-79
pubmed: 26993278
Psych J. 2016 Sep;5(3):145-60
pubmed: 27678480
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 20;7:1596
pubmed: 27812339
Front Psychol. 2017 May 09;8:727
pubmed: 28536548
Psych J. 2017 Jun;6(2):110-119
pubmed: 28660742
Psych J. 2018 Mar;7(1):51-52
pubmed: 29297978
Science. 1995 May 12;268(5212):889-93
pubmed: 7754376
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13500-7
pubmed: 8942963