Markerless tumor tracking using fast-kV switching dual-energy fluoroscopy on a benchtop system.
dual-energy imaging
fluoroscopy
markerless tumor tracking
template matching
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
29
01
2019
revised:
25
04
2019
accepted:
26
04
2019
pubmed:
7
5
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
7
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate markerless tumor tracking (MTT) using fast-kV switching dual-energy (DE) fluoroscopy on a bench top system. Fast-kV switching DE fluoroscopy was implemented on a bench top which includes a turntable stand, flat panel detector, and x-ray tube. The customized generator firmware enables consecutive x-ray pulses that alternate between programmed high and low energies (e.g., 60 and 120 kVp) with a maximum frame rate of 15 Hz. In-house software was implemented to perform weighted DE subtraction of consecutive images to create an image sequence that removes bone and enhances soft tissues. The weighting factor was optimized based on gantry angle. To characterize this system, a phantom was used that simulates the chest anatomy and tumor motion in the lung. Five clinically relevant tumor sizes (5-25 mm diameter) were considered. The targets were programmed to move in the inferior-superior direction of the phantom, perpendicular to the x-ray beam, using a cos For the 5 mm target, a CT slice thickness of 0.75 mm resulted in the lowest tracking error. For the larger targets (≥10 mm) a CT slice thickness ≤2 mm resulted in comparable tracking errors for SE and DE images. Overall DE imaging improved MTT accuracy, relative to SE imaging, for all tumor targets in a rotational acquisition. Compared to SE, DE imaging increased tracking success rate of small target inserts (5 and 10 mm). For fast motion tracking, success rates improved from 23% to 64% and 74% to 90% for 5 and 10 mm targets inserts overlapping ribs, respectively. For slow moving targets success rates improved from 19% to 59% and 59% to 91% in 5 and 10 mm targets overlapping the ribs, respectively. Similar results were observed when the targets overlapped the spine. For larger targets (≥15 mm) tracking success rates were comparable using SE and DE imaging. This work presents the first results of MTT using fast-kV switching DE fluoroscopy. Using DE imaging has improved the tracking accuracy of MTT, especially for small targets. The results of this study will guide the future implementation of fast-kV switching DE imaging using the on-board imager of a linear accelerator.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31059124
doi: 10.1002/mp.13573
pmc: PMC6625841
mid: NIHMS1027736
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3235-3244Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA207483
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Cancer Institute
Organisme : National Institutes of Health
ID : R01CA207483
Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Med Phys. 2014 Mar;41(3):031702
pubmed: 24593706
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Apr 1;70(5):1571-8
pubmed: 18374231
Phys Med Biol. 2010 May 7;55(9):2505-22
pubmed: 20393232
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Dec 1;63(5):1442-7
pubmed: 16109463
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Jan 21;64(3):03NT01
pubmed: 30566913
Br J Radiol. 2016 Dec;89(1068):20160648
pubmed: 27730838
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jun 1;65(2):528-34
pubmed: 16690435
Med Phys. 1981 May-Jun;8(3):353-7
pubmed: 7033756
Med Phys. 2015 Apr;42(4):1640-52
pubmed: 25832054
Med Phys. 2016 Apr;43(4):1907
pubmed: 27036586
Med Image Anal. 1996 Mar;1(1):35-51
pubmed: 9873920
Med Phys. 2014 Dec;41(12):121703
pubmed: 25471950
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 21;58(12):4195-204
pubmed: 23715431
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 21;58(12):4331-40
pubmed: 23732651
Med Phys. 2008 Feb;35(2):629-32
pubmed: 18383684
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Aug 21;50(16):3655-67
pubmed: 16077219
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Apr 21;62(8):3065-3080
pubmed: 28323642
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:6023-7
pubmed: 23367302
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):e749-56
pubmed: 22330989
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 1;89(3):525-31
pubmed: 24751406
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Dec;117(3):487-90
pubmed: 26344088
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Mar 04;14(2):4046
pubmed: 23470933
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Oct;121(1):148-153
pubmed: 27475278
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Dec 7;49(23):5347-56
pubmed: 15656282
Med Phys. 2015 Jan;42(1):254-62
pubmed: 25563265
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jul 21;52(14):4081-98
pubmed: 17664596
Phys Med Biol. 2000 Sep;45(9):N103-10
pubmed: 11008969
Front Oncol. 2018 Apr 04;8:87
pubmed: 29670854
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Feb;102(2):274-80
pubmed: 21885144
Acad Radiol. 2011 Feb;18(2):191-6
pubmed: 21232683
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):1088-98
pubmed: 17187940
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Oct;121(1):19-25
pubmed: 27650013
J Med Radiat Sci. 2018 Mar;65(1):48-54
pubmed: 29205937
Med Dosim. 2017 Summer;42(2):150-155
pubmed: 28495033
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017 Jun 14;9:437-446
pubmed: 28652810