Evaluating Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Augmented Depression Therapy Cognitive Behavioural therapy Feasibility study Major depressive disorder Mixed methods Pilot study

Journal

Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 23 07 2018
accepted: 28 03 2019
entrez: 8 5 2019
pubmed: 8 5 2019
medline: 8 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While existing psychological treatments for depression are effective for many, a significant proportion of depressed individuals do not respond to current approaches and few remain well over the long-term. Anhedonia (a loss of interest or pleasure) is a core symptom of depression which predicts a poor prognosis but has been neglected by existing treatments. Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) has been co-designed with service users to better target anhedonia alongside other features of depression. This mixed methods pilot trial aims to establish proof of concept for ADepT and to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a future definitive trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of ADepT, compared to an evidence-based mainstream therapy (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CBT) in the acute treatment of depression, the prevention of subsequent depressive relapse, and the enhancement of wellbeing. We aim to recruit 80 depressed participants and randomise them 1:1 to receive ADepT (15 weekly acute and 5 booster sessions in following year) or CBT (20 weekly acute sessions). Clinical and health economic assessments will take place at intake and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. Reductions in PHQ-9 depression severity and increases in WEMWBS wellbeing at 6-month assessment (when acute treatment should be completed) are the co-primary outcomes. Quantitative and qualitative process evaluation will assess mechanism of action, implementation issues, and contextual moderating factors. To evaluate proof of concept, intake-post effect sizes and the proportion of individuals showing reliable and clinically significant change on outcome measures in each arm at each follow-up will be reported. To evaluate feasibility and acceptability, we will examine recruitment, retention, treatment completion, and data completeness rates and feedback from patients and therapists about their experience of study participation and therapy. Additionally, we will establish the cost of delivery of ADepT. We will proceed to definitive trial if any concerns about the safety, acceptability, feasibility, and proof of concept of ADepT and trial procedures can be rectified, and we recruit, retain, and collect follow-up data on at least 60% of the target sample. ISCRTN85278228, registered 27/03/2017.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While existing psychological treatments for depression are effective for many, a significant proportion of depressed individuals do not respond to current approaches and few remain well over the long-term. Anhedonia (a loss of interest or pleasure) is a core symptom of depression which predicts a poor prognosis but has been neglected by existing treatments. Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) has been co-designed with service users to better target anhedonia alongside other features of depression. This mixed methods pilot trial aims to establish proof of concept for ADepT and to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a future definitive trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of ADepT, compared to an evidence-based mainstream therapy (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CBT) in the acute treatment of depression, the prevention of subsequent depressive relapse, and the enhancement of wellbeing.
METHODS METHODS
We aim to recruit 80 depressed participants and randomise them 1:1 to receive ADepT (15 weekly acute and 5 booster sessions in following year) or CBT (20 weekly acute sessions). Clinical and health economic assessments will take place at intake and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. Reductions in PHQ-9 depression severity and increases in WEMWBS wellbeing at 6-month assessment (when acute treatment should be completed) are the co-primary outcomes. Quantitative and qualitative process evaluation will assess mechanism of action, implementation issues, and contextual moderating factors. To evaluate proof of concept, intake-post effect sizes and the proportion of individuals showing reliable and clinically significant change on outcome measures in each arm at each follow-up will be reported. To evaluate feasibility and acceptability, we will examine recruitment, retention, treatment completion, and data completeness rates and feedback from patients and therapists about their experience of study participation and therapy. Additionally, we will establish the cost of delivery of ADepT.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
We will proceed to definitive trial if any concerns about the safety, acceptability, feasibility, and proof of concept of ADepT and trial procedures can be rectified, and we recruit, retain, and collect follow-up data on at least 60% of the target sample.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ISCRTN85278228, registered 27/03/2017.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31061718
doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0438-1
pii: 438
pmc: PMC6486988
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

63

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : CDF-2014-07-010
Pays : United Kingdom

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Ethical Approval has been granted by the U.K. National Research Ethics Service, South West – Cornwall and Plymouth meeting. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [112]. Informed consent will be obtained following a multi-stage process. Participants will first give permission for the research team to contact them to discuss the study. Following this, informed consent will be taken in person by a study researcher (EW) prior to the baseline eligibility and assessment interview. Potential participants will receive full information about the study in advance of the interview, and at the point of consent there will be further opportunity to discuss the study and for the participant to raise any questions. Researchers will be fully trained in taking informed consent, including assessment of capacity to consent where appropriate. Consent will be taken only from individuals with capacity to make an informed decision on their participation.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Références

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 26;10:26
pubmed: 20102609
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):148-50
pubmed: 16390903
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):715-25
pubmed: 26389597
Depress Anxiety. 2001;13(4):166-78
pubmed: 11413563
Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1940-3
pubmed: 15528409
BMJ. 2000 Dec 2;321(7273):1389-92
pubmed: 11099285
JAMA. 2010 Jan 6;303(1):47-53
pubmed: 20051569
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
Psychol Med. 2003 Aug;33(6):977-86
pubmed: 12946082
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;44(6):540-8
pubmed: 3579500
Psychol Med. 2014 Mar;44(4):685-95
pubmed: 23552610
Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(1):103-11
pubmed: 15756910
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):167-76
pubmed: 21598064
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:461-4
pubmed: 11983645
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Feb-May;15(1-2):65-73
pubmed: 12745312
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec;77(6):1078-88
pubmed: 19968384
J Affect Disord. 2014 Apr;159:118-26
pubmed: 24679399
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Sep;42(9):1089-104
pubmed: 15325903
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9
pubmed: 2002127
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;167(7):748-51
pubmed: 20595427
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;9(2):161-79
pubmed: 25544856
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;54(11):989-91
pubmed: 9366654
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):742-7
pubmed: 3395203
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jul;28(7):791-802
pubmed: 27078186
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):195-201
pubmed: 23337231
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;55(1):221-31
pubmed: 24060237
BMJ. 2011 Apr 11;342:d1766
pubmed: 21482590
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;31(2):73-86
pubmed: 11132119
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 May;184:386-92
pubmed: 15123501
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):843-63
pubmed: 17907866
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):819-29
pubmed: 20655136
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):808-9
pubmed: 17826154
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Oct;79(5):618-28
pubmed: 21767001
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Feb 19;7:15
pubmed: 19228398
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Br J Soc Psychol. 2006 Sep;45(Pt 3):639-56
pubmed: 16984725
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):326-40
pubmed: 22674611
Psychol Methods. 2004 Jun;9(2):164-82
pubmed: 15137887
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5
pubmed: 21584907
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6
pubmed: 17448732
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):851-8
pubmed: 17826170
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Sep;175(9):526-36
pubmed: 3655778
Trials. 2014 Jan 21;15:29
pubmed: 24447460
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37
pubmed: 20526405
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):909-22
pubmed: 19045960
Cognit Ther Res. 2008 Aug 1;32(4):507-525
pubmed: 20360998
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Jun;75(3):475-88
pubmed: 17563164
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb;116(1):80-5
pubmed: 17324018
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Jun;152(6):843-9
pubmed: 7755112
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Feb;45(2):156-74
pubmed: 12625231
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63
pubmed: 18042300
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):283-90
pubmed: 22653834
Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82
pubmed: 12964174
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):301-8
pubmed: 22169081
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Oct 08;8:22
pubmed: 19811665
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Aug 30;179(1):101-6
pubmed: 20472297
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:390-6
pubmed: 25545606
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;167(1):99-103
pubmed: 7551619
J Clin Psychol. 2009 May;65(5):467-87
pubmed: 19301241
Lancet. 2016 Aug 27;388(10047):871-80
pubmed: 27461440
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):539-48
pubmed: 15982151
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):985-91
pubmed: 22528615
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3095-105
pubmed: 12813115

Auteurs

Barnaby D Dunn (BD)

1Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Emily Widnall (E)

1Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Nigel Reed (N)

1Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Rod Taylor (R)

2College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Christabel Owens (C)

2College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Anne Spencer (A)

2College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Gerda Kraag (G)

3Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Gerjo Kok (G)

3Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Nicole Geschwind (N)

4Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Kim Wright (K)

1Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Nicholas J Moberly (NJ)

1Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Michelle L Moulds (ML)

5School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Andrew K MacLeod (AK)

6Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.

Rachel Handley (R)

1Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

David Richards (D)

2College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

John Campbell (J)

2College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Willem Kuyken (W)

7Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Classifications MeSH