Dose escalation of external beam radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer-Impact of multiple high-risk factor.
Biochemical control
Dose escalation
External beam radiotherapy
Prostate cancer
Journal
Asian journal of urology
ISSN: 2214-3882
Titre abrégé: Asian J Urol
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101699720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
16
02
2017
revised:
14
07
2017
accepted:
31
07
2017
entrez:
8
5
2019
pubmed:
8
5
2019
medline:
8
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To retrospectively investigate the treatment outcomes of external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in high-risk prostate cancer in three radiotherapy dose groups. Between 1998 and 2013, patients with high-risk prostate cancer underwent three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy of 66 Gy, 72 Gy, or 78 Gy with ADT. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse was defined using the Phoenix definition. PSA relapse-free survival (PRFS) was evaluated in each radiotherapy dose group. Moreover, high-risk patients were divided into H-1 (patients with multiple high-risk factors) and H-2 (patients with a single high-risk factor) as risk subgroups. Two hundred and eighty-nine patients with a median follow-up period of 77.3 months were analyzed in this study. The median duration of ADT was 10.1 months. Age, Gleason score, T stage, and radiotherapy dose influenced PRFS with statistical significance both in univariate and multivariate analyses. The 4-year PRFS rates in Group-66 Gy, Group-72 Gy and Group-78 Gy were 72.7%, 81.6% and 90.3%, respectively. PRFS rates in the H-1 subgroup differed with statistical significance with an increasing radiotherapy dose having a more favorable PRFS, while PRFS rates in H-2 subgroup did not differ with increase in radiotherapy dose. Dose escalation for high-risk prostate cancer in combination with ADT improved PRFS. PRFS for patients in the H-1 subgroup was poor, but dose escalation in those patients was beneficial, while dose escalation in the H-2 subgroup was not proven to be effective for improving PRFS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31061806
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.07.002
pii: S2214-3882(17)30020-6
pmc: PMC6488684
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
192-199Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Sep 1;48(2):519-28
pubmed: 10974471
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105
pubmed: 12128107
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1285-90
pubmed: 15817329
J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):1990-6
pubmed: 16648499
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):965-74
pubmed: 16798415
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):1053-8
pubmed: 17398023
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87
pubmed: 17482880
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74
pubmed: 17765406
JAMA. 2008 Jan 23;299(3):289-95
pubmed: 18212313
Eur Urol. 2008 Jun;53(6):1172-9
pubmed: 18222596
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jul 15;71(4):1028-33
pubmed: 18280056
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1106-11
pubmed: 20124169
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Mar 1;79(3):724-31
pubmed: 20472361
BJU Int. 2011 Mar;107(5):765-770
pubmed: 20875089
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1066-73
pubmed: 20933466
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jun 1;80(2):437-44
pubmed: 21050673
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 15;80(4):1056-63
pubmed: 21147514
Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):451-9
pubmed: 21440505
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e335-44
pubmed: 21645976
Eur Urol. 2011 Dec;60(6):1133-9
pubmed: 21889832
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):e773-9
pubmed: 22300573
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 1;83(3):e363-70
pubmed: 22633552
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):64-71
pubmed: 23462420
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):932-8
pubmed: 24113055
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):157-164
pubmed: 24486307
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):320-7
pubmed: 25702876
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 15;93(4):828-35
pubmed: 26530751
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 20;34(15):1748-56
pubmed: 26976418