Ultra-low dose contrast CT pulmonary angiography in oncology patients using a high-pitch helical dual-source technology.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Computed Tomography Angiography
/ methods
Contrast Media
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Pulmonary Embolism
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiation Dosage
Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection
Retrospective Studies
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Young Adult
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
8
5
2019
medline:
7
1
2020
entrez:
8
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to determine if the image quality and vascular enhancement are preserved in computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) studies performed with ultra-low contrast and optimized radiation dose using high-pitch helical mode of a second generation dual source scanner. We retrospectively evaluated oncology patients who had CTPA on a 128-slice dual-source scanner, with a high-pitch helical mode (3.0), following injection of 30 mL of Ioversal at 4 mL/s with body mass index (BMI) dependent tube potential (80-120 kVp) and current (130-150 mAs). Attenuation, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured in multiple pulmonary arteries. Three independent readers graded the images on a 5-point Likert scale for central vascular enhancement (CVE), peripheral vascular enhancement (PVE), and overall quality. There were 50 males and 101 females in our study. BMI ranged from 13 to 38 kg/m2 (22.8±4.4 kg/m2). Pulmonary embolism was present in 29 patients (18.9%). Contrast enhancement and SNR were excellent in all the pulmonary arteries (395.3±131.1 and 18.3±5.7, respectively). Image quality was considered excellent by all the readers, with average reader scores near the highest possible score of 5.0 (CVE, 4.83±0.48; PVE, 4.68±0.65; noise/quality, 4.78±0.47). The average radiation dose length product (DLP) was 161±60 mGy.cm. Using a helical high-pitch acquisition technique, CTPA images of excellent diagnostic quality, including visualization of peripheral segmental/sub-segmental branches can be obtained using an ultra-low dose of iodinated contrast and low radiation dose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31063136
doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.17498
pmc: PMC6521906
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
195-203Références
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 27;160(6):809-15
pubmed: 10737280
Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:151-69
pubmed: 11910059
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 10;162(11):1245-8
pubmed: 12038942
Thromb Haemost. 2002 Jun;87(6):1076-7
pubmed: 12083490
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003;4 Suppl 5:S3-9
pubmed: 14668704
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):329-37
pubmed: 16183940
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 1;354(22):2317-27
pubmed: 16738268
Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):899-907
pubmed: 17114631
Stat Med. 2007 Aug 30;26(19):3661-75
pubmed: 17315184
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1255-61
pubmed: 17449768
Cancer. 2007 Sep 15;110(6):1376-84
pubmed: 17634949
Radiographics. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(7):1807-16
pubmed: 18772273
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):362-8
pubmed: 18842371
Acad Radiol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1494-504
pubmed: 19000866
Invest Radiol. 2008 Dec;43(12):871-6
pubmed: 19002059
Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 Jan;47(1):27-40
pubmed: 19195532
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):706-14
pubmed: 19789225
Invest Radiol. 2009 Dec;44(12):793-9
pubmed: 19884825
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):e11-7
pubmed: 20149952
Biometrika. 1947;34(1-2):139-69
pubmed: 20287827
Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):625-32
pubmed: 20551182
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(4):491-500
pubmed: 20647583
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:153-8
pubmed: 21468175
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Aug;197(2):W273-8
pubmed: 21785053
Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):279-86
pubmed: 21874569
Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):290-7
pubmed: 22084206
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2011 Nov-Dec;6(6):507-13
pubmed: 22144029
J Thorac Imaging. 2013 Jan;28(1):49-59
pubmed: 22576762
Clin Radiol. 2012 Sep;67(9):833-9
pubmed: 22683247
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec;199(6):1220-5
pubmed: 23169711
Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):256-66
pubmed: 23319663
Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):719-28
pubmed: 23579046
Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):3205-12
pubmed: 23732690
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):1793-8
pubmed: 23743054
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov;201(5):971-6
pubmed: 24147466
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Oct 30;19:908-15
pubmed: 24169688
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Feb;83(2):322-8
pubmed: 24361061
Eur Radiol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1868-77
pubmed: 24865694
Eur Radiol. 2014 Nov;24(11):2677-84
pubmed: 25052076
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Oct;83(10):1962-9
pubmed: 25084687
Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3260-8
pubmed: 25100336
Acta Radiol. 2015 Jun;56(6):761-8
pubmed: 25246093
J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Jan;30(1):69-76
pubmed: 25423130
Invest Radiol. 2015 May;50(5):352-60
pubmed: 25591129
Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr;25(4):1182-9
pubmed: 25636413
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):692-7
pubmed: 25654667
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Nov;84(11):2314-20
pubmed: 26210093
Acad Radiol. 2015 Dec;22(12):1562-70
pubmed: 26432073
Circulation. 2015 Nov 17;132(20):1931-6
pubmed: 26572669
Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):3310-8
pubmed: 26685852
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun;40(3):370-4
pubmed: 26854416
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20151059
pubmed: 27007972
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):495-504
pubmed: 27897042
Radiology. 1980 Jan;134(1):149-54
pubmed: 7350595