Multidetector CT appearance of the pelvis after vaginal delivery: normal appearances and abnormal acute findings.
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
8
5
2019
medline:
7
1
2020
entrez:
8
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vaginal delivery is the most commonly performed delivery in the world and accounts for nearly two-thirds of all deliveries in the United States. It is a secure method but may be associated with some acute complications, especially in the immediate postpartum days, which can potentially be fatal for the mother. The most frequent acute complications are hemorrhages/hematomas, uterine rupture, endometritis, retained product of conception (RPOC), ovarian thrombosis and HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count). A first evaluation of the clinical status of the patients is executed by the clinicians who, depending on their experience, perform ultrasonography by themselves and eventually may request further radiologic exams in doubtful cases. Radiologists may play an important role recognizing early postpartum complications and differentiating them from physiologic postoperative findings. In this setting, the use of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is important for diagnosis of suspected postpartum complications. The aim of this article is to review the normal and abnormal post vaginal delivery MDCT aspects in order to help the clinical management by preventing misdiagnoses and tailoring the best medical treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31063140
doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.18127
pmc: PMC6521907
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
210-218Références
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2000;27(1):24-6
pubmed: 10758793
J Ultrasound Med. 2003 Mar;22(3):287-93
pubmed: 12636329
Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(1):21-32
pubmed: 15642178
Emerg Radiol. 2007 Mar;13(6):299-306
pubmed: 17216173
CMAJ. 2007 Feb 13;176(4):455-60
pubmed: 17296957
Abdom Imaging. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):101-3
pubmed: 17435984
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Feb 26;9:8
pubmed: 19245695
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Apr;74(1):50-9
pubmed: 19477095
Radiographics. 2009 Nov;29(7):1987-2003
pubmed: 19926758
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb;194(2):383-90
pubmed: 20093600
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;202(4):353.e1-6
pubmed: 20350642
Radiographics. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):1463-81
pubmed: 22977030
Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):1575-97
pubmed: 23065159
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb;200(2):W143-54
pubmed: 23345378
Radiographics. 2013 May;33(3):781-96
pubmed: 23674774
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):449.e1-7
pubmed: 23871950
Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Jun;11(6):511-8
pubmed: 24639786
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):5-12
pubmed: 25560097
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2015;2015:817862
pubmed: 26185694
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2015 Dec;43(12):773-9
pubmed: 26597488
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;127(3):501-6
pubmed: 26855108
Eur J Radiol Open. 2015 Jun 15;2:101-10
pubmed: 26937442
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 Nov-Dec;22(6):534-541
pubmed: 27756714
Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Mar;35(1):15-34
pubmed: 28131117
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 May;42(5):1543-1555
pubmed: 28260169