Durvalumab in Combination with Olaparib in Patients with Relapsed SCLC: Results from a Phase II Study.
Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ pharmacology
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ pharmacology
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ pharmacology
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Phthalazines
/ pharmacology
Piperazines
/ pharmacology
Recurrence
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
/ drug therapy
DNA repair
PARP inhibitors
Small cell lung cancer
immune checkpoint blockade
tumor immune phenotype
Journal
Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
ISSN: 1556-1380
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
05
02
2019
revised:
19
03
2019
accepted:
10
04
2019
pubmed:
8
5
2019
medline:
24
7
2020
entrez:
8
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite high tumor mutationburden, immune checkpoint blockade has limited efficacy in SCLC. We hypothesized that poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition could render SCLC more susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. A single-arm, phase II trial (NCT02484404) enrolled patients with relapsed SCLC who received durvalumab, 1500 mg every 4 weeks, and olaparib, 300 mg twice a day. The primary outcome was objective response rate. Correlative studies included mandatory collection of pretreatment and during-treatment biopsy specimens, which were assessed to define SCLC immunephenotypes: desert (CD8-positive T-cell prevalence low), excluded (CD8-positive T cells in stroma immediately adjacent/within tumor), and inflamed (CD8-positive T cells in direct contact with tumor). A total of 20 patients were enrolled. Their median age was 64 years, and most patients (60%) had platinum-resistant/refractory disease. Of 19 evaluable patients, two were observed to have partial or complete responses (10.5%), including a patient with EGFR-transformed SCLC. Clinical benefit was observed in four patients (21.1% [95% confidence interval: 6.1%-45.6%]) with confirmed responses or prolonged stable disease (≥8 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events were anemia (80%), lymphopenia (60%), and leukopenia (50%). Nine of 14 tumors (64%) exhibited an excluded phenotype; 21% and 14% of tumors exhibited the inflamed and desert phenotypes, respectively. Tumor responses were observed in all instances in which pretreatment tumors showed an inflamed phenotype. Of the five tumors without an inflamed phenotype at baseline, no during-treatment increase in T-cell infiltration or programmed death ligand 1 expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells was observed. The study combination did not meet the preset bar for efficacy. Pretreatment and during-treatment biopsy specimens suggested that tumor immune phenotypes may be relevant for SCLC responses to immune checkpoint blockade combinations. The predictive value of preexisting CD8-positive T-cell infiltrates observed in this study needs to be confirmed in larger cohorts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31063862
pii: S1556-0864(19)30361-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.04.026
pmc: PMC6660419
mid: NIHMS1528600
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Phthalazines
0
Piperazines
0
durvalumab
28X28X9OKV
olaparib
WOH1JD9AR8
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1447-1457Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA BC011793
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA BC011793-01
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Nature. 2018 Feb 22;554(7693):544-548
pubmed: 29443960
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):883-895
pubmed: 27269741
J Immunol. 2017 Feb 15;198(4):1649-1659
pubmed: 28069806
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2193-2202
pubmed: 28471727
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 5;109(1):
pubmed: 27707838
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jul;11(7):964-75
pubmed: 27117833
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):563-7
pubmed: 25428504
Cancer Discov. 2019 May;9(5):646-661
pubmed: 30777870
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Dec;17(12):725-737
pubmed: 29077690
J Exp Med. 1985 May 1;161(5):1135-51
pubmed: 2580935
Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 15;78(24):6717-6725
pubmed: 30498083
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Sep;3(9):1052-62
pubmed: 25943534
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):74-80
pubmed: 25838376
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jul 6;8(346):346fs12
pubmed: 27384345
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 24;8(1):1751
pubmed: 29170499
Cancer Discov. 2017 Jun;7(6):620-629
pubmed: 28242752
Cancer Cell. 2018 May 14;33(5):853-861.e4
pubmed: 29731394
Cancer Discov. 2012 Sep;2(9):798-811
pubmed: 22961666
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):222-229
pubmed: 30523756
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3823-3829
pubmed: 28813164
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3711-3720
pubmed: 28167507
Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 1;72(21):5588-99
pubmed: 23118055
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 10;36(23):2386-2394
pubmed: 29906251
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):278-285
pubmed: 30550363
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015 Aug 7;463(4):551-6
pubmed: 26047697
Cell. 2016 Mar 24;165(1):35-44
pubmed: 26997480
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71
pubmed: 25428505
Cancer Discov. 2017 Jul;7(7):675-693
pubmed: 28630051