Preservation Methods Influence the Biomechanical Properties of Human Lateral Menisci: An Ex Vivo Comparative Study of 3 Methods.

allograft conservation cryopreservation freezing irradiation mechanical properties meniscus storage

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Historique:
entrez: 9 5 2019
pubmed: 9 5 2019
medline: 9 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Three main meniscal preservation methods have been used over the past decade: cryopreservation, freezing, and freezing with gamma irradiation. All 3 preservation methods will result in similar biomechanical properties as defined by tensile and compression testing. Controlled laboratory study. A total of 24 human lateral menisci were collected from patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria were patients younger than 70 years with primary unilateral (medial) femorotibial knee osteoarthritis. Each meniscus was divided into 2 specimens cross-sectionally. One specimen was systematically cryopreserved and constituted the control (Cy; -140°C), and the other specimen was used for either the simple frozen group (Fr; -80°C) or the frozen+irradiated group (FrI; -80°C + 25-kGy irradiation). Compression and tensile tests were performed to analyze the elasticity modulus (Young modulus) in compression, the elasticity modulus in tension, the tensile force at failure, and the rupture profile of the tensile stress-strain curve. A significant difference in the mean compression elasticity modulus was observed between the Cy and Fr groups (28.86 ± 0.77 vs 37.26 ± 1.08 MPa, respectively; Cryopreservation allows for more elastic and less fragile tissue compared with simple freezing or freezing plus irradiation. The study results exhibit the detrimental effect of simple freezing and freezing plus irradiation on human meniscal mechanical properties. If these effects occur in menisci prepared for allograft procedures, important differences could appear in the graft's mechanical behavior and thus patient outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Three main meniscal preservation methods have been used over the past decade: cryopreservation, freezing, and freezing with gamma irradiation.
HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
All 3 preservation methods will result in similar biomechanical properties as defined by tensile and compression testing.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 24 human lateral menisci were collected from patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria were patients younger than 70 years with primary unilateral (medial) femorotibial knee osteoarthritis. Each meniscus was divided into 2 specimens cross-sectionally. One specimen was systematically cryopreserved and constituted the control (Cy; -140°C), and the other specimen was used for either the simple frozen group (Fr; -80°C) or the frozen+irradiated group (FrI; -80°C + 25-kGy irradiation). Compression and tensile tests were performed to analyze the elasticity modulus (Young modulus) in compression, the elasticity modulus in tension, the tensile force at failure, and the rupture profile of the tensile stress-strain curve.
RESULTS RESULTS
A significant difference in the mean compression elasticity modulus was observed between the Cy and Fr groups (28.86 ± 0.77 vs 37.26 ± 1.08 MPa, respectively;
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Cryopreservation allows for more elastic and less fragile tissue compared with simple freezing or freezing plus irradiation.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE CONCLUSIONS
The study results exhibit the detrimental effect of simple freezing and freezing plus irradiation on human meniscal mechanical properties. If these effects occur in menisci prepared for allograft procedures, important differences could appear in the graft's mechanical behavior and thus patient outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31065555
doi: 10.1177/2325967119841622
pii: 10.1177_2325967119841622
pmc: PMC6488788
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2325967119841622

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: S.P. and M.O. are educational consultants for Newclip. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Références

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(2):81-4
pubmed: 10223528
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Aug;(377):161-8
pubmed: 10943198
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;30(2):174-81
pubmed: 11912084
Am J Sports Med. 2003 May-Jun;31(3):474-81
pubmed: 12750147
J Orthop Res. 2004 Jul;22(4):807-14
pubmed: 15183438
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr;87(4):715-24
pubmed: 15805198
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2005 Sep;219(5):337-47
pubmed: 16225150
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Aug;14(8):694-706
pubmed: 16463170
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Apr;16(4):353-9
pubmed: 18066525
J Orthop Res. 2008 May;26(5):673-84
pubmed: 18183628
J Orthop Res. 2008 Jul;26(7):951-6
pubmed: 18271010
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Jun;17(6):639-44
pubmed: 19225756
Am J Sports Med. 2009 May;37(5):884-9
pubmed: 19336615
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2000 Jan 1;15(2):55-62
pubmed: 22388443
Transfus Med Hemother. 2012 Feb;39(1):36-40
pubmed: 22896765
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Mar;(252):19-31
pubmed: 2406069
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Sep;68(9):1180-8
pubmed: 24141832
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):E4832-41
pubmed: 25349395
J Biomech. 2015 May 1;48(7):1264-9
pubmed: 25828400
Isr Med Assoc J. 2015 Jun;17(6):365-9
pubmed: 26233996
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Jun;73(2):100-8
pubmed: 26517162
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1886-93
pubmed: 26872913
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Nov;103(7):1027-1030
pubmed: 28760374
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Sep-Dec;25(3):2309499017727946
pubmed: 28844199
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;46(12):2899-2904
pubmed: 30141963
Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1987;41:363-78
pubmed: 3332492
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1987 Dec;54(6):517-21
pubmed: 3434096
J Biomech. 1995 Apr;28(4):411-22
pubmed: 7738050
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5(2):124-34
pubmed: 9228320

Auteurs

Christophe Jacquet (C)

Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France.

Roger Erivan (R)

University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Akash Sharma (A)

Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France.

Martine Pithioux (M)

Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France.

Sebastien Parratte (S)

Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France.

Jean-Nöel Argenson (JN)

Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France.

Matthieu Ollivier (M)

Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France.
Etablissement Français du Sang, Marseille, France.

Classifications MeSH