Impact of aging on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ drug therapy
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
/ blood
Aspirin
/ therapeutic use
Clopidogrel
/ therapeutic use
Diabetes Mellitus
/ blood
Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
/ methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Platelet Activation
/ drug effects
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Risk Factors
Ticagrelor
/ therapeutic use
Aging
Diabetes mellitus
Dual antiplatelet therapy
Platelet aggregation
Journal
Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis
ISSN: 1573-742X
Titre abrégé: J Thromb Thrombolysis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9502018
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
9
5
2019
medline:
20
2
2020
entrez:
9
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Advanced age and diabetes represent summative conditions in the determination of cardiovascular risk, and especially for the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), often requiring balancing between bleeding and thrombotic complications. However, few studies have so far evaluated the impact of age on platelet reactivity and suboptimal platelet inhibition (high-on treatment platelet reactivity-HRPR) on DAPT among diabetic patients, that was, therefore the aim of the present study. In diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor) platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined for values above the lower limit of normality (in non-treated patients). Elderly patients were considered ≥ 75 years of age. We included 462 patients, among them 149 (32.2%) were ≥ 75 years. Elderly patients were more often females (p = 0.006), with lower body size (p = 0.04), acute coronary syndrome at presentation and renal failure (p < 0.001), non-smokers (p = 0.002), in therapy with insulin (p = 0.02) and diuretics (p < 0.001) and lower rate of betablockers (p = 0.02). Age directly related with C reactive protein (p = 0.01), creatinine levels and inversely with hemoglobin (p < 0.001) and triglycerides (p = 0.003). No association was found at linear regression analysis for platelet reactivity and age with different activating stimuli, but for ASPI test (r = 0.12; p = 0.03). No significant difference in HAPR was found in elderly patients (2.4 vs. 3.2%, p = 0.76, OR[95% CI] = 0.45[0.1-2.11], p = 0.31). HRPR for ADP antagonists was similarly not affected by age (30.1% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.28, adjusted OR[95% CI] = 0.78[0.47-1.29], p = 0.33). Comparable results were obtained when considering separately the DAPT strategies with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, or when adjusting our results according to propensity score values. Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, age does not affect platelet reactivity or the rate of high-on treatment platelet reactivity. Similar results were obtained for ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31065927
doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01873-2
pii: 10.1007/s11239-019-01873-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Clopidogrel
A74586SNO7
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
413-421Références
Diabetes. 2005 Aug;54(8):2430-5
pubmed: 16046311
Circulation. 2008 Oct 14;118(16):1626-36
pubmed: 18757948
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009 Oct;28(3):288-98
pubmed: 19030969
Atherosclerosis. 2009 Nov;207(1):181-5
pubmed: 19426981
Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Jun;131(6):834-42
pubmed: 19461090
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):1045-57
pubmed: 19717846
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jan;8(1):37-42
pubmed: 19818001
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Sep 14;56(12):919-33
pubmed: 20828644
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2010 Oct;7(4):251-9
pubmed: 20921090
Am Heart J. 2010 Dec;160(6 Suppl):S22-7
pubmed: 21147288
Thromb Haemost. 2011 Aug;106(2):265-71
pubmed: 21713326
Thromb Res. 2012 May;129(5):557-62
pubmed: 21851966
Eur Heart J. 2012 May;33(10):1241-9
pubmed: 22067090
Int J Lab Hematol. 2012 Oct;34(5):484-94
pubmed: 22613071
Adv Ther. 2013 Feb;30(2):190-202
pubmed: 23359066
Heart Vessels. 2014 Jan;29(1):15-20
pubmed: 23494604
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;112(2):181-6
pubmed: 23664294
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 13;62(7):577-83
pubmed: 23747759
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2261-73
pubmed: 24076493
Thromb Res. 2013;132(6):692-5
pubmed: 24140451
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;63(4):339-50
pubmed: 24336016
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e85566
pubmed: 24465602
Eur J Clin Invest. 2014 Jul;44(7):634-42
pubmed: 24829065
Clin Sci (Lond). 2015 Jan;128(2):121-30
pubmed: 25124236
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):530-6
pubmed: 25262263
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2015;13(5):594-615
pubmed: 25543899
Exp Gerontol. 2015 Feb;62:32-6
pubmed: 25562813
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Aug;40(2):203-10
pubmed: 25575607
Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1305-10
pubmed: 25759104
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6):e001683
pubmed: 26056248
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 7;36(46):3238-49
pubmed: 26163482
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 1;116(5):686-93
pubmed: 26187674
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jan;14(1):57-64
pubmed: 26512550
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Aug;42(2):245-53
pubmed: 26951167
Thromb Res. 2016 Jul;143:45-9
pubmed: 27179132
Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2015-2022
pubmed: 27581531
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177
pubmed: 28886621
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260
pubmed: 28886622
Pharmacol Res. 2018 Mar;129:535-543
pubmed: 29208494
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Jun;29(4):309-315
pubmed: 29309286
Eur Heart J. 2018 May 14;39(19):1672-1686f
pubmed: 29509886