Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
03
08
2018
accepted:
05
04
2019
entrez:
9
5
2019
pubmed:
9
5
2019
medline:
10
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known that, after agriculture appeared in West Africa, it spread across most of subequatorial Africa. It has been proposed that this spread took place alongside with that of Bantu languages. In eastern and southeastern Africa, it is also linked to the Early Iron Age. From the beginning of the last millennium BC, cereal agriculture spread rapidly from the Great Lakes area eastwards to the East African coast, and southwards to northeastern South Africa. Here we show that the southwards spread took place substantially more rapidly (1.50-2.27 km/y) than the eastwards spread (0.59-1.27 km/y). Such a faster southwards spread could be the result of a stronger cultural effect. To assess this possibility, we compare these observed ranges to those obtained from a demic-cultural wave-of-advance model. We find that both spreads were driven by demic diffusion, in agreement with most archaeological, linguistic and genetic results. Nonetheless, the southwards spread seems to have indeed a stronger cultural component, which could lead support to the hypothesis that, at the southern areas, the interaction with pastoralist people may have played a significant role.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31067220
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215573
pii: PONE-D-18-22987
pmc: PMC6506142
doi:
Types de publication
Historical Article
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0215573Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e410
pubmed: 16292981
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 22;279(1741):3256-63
pubmed: 22628476
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Jan;19(1):84-8
pubmed: 20736976
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 31;9(1):e87854
pubmed: 24498213
Nat Commun. 2018 May 25;9(1):2077
pubmed: 29802241
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 17;9(12):e113672
pubmed: 25517968
Science. 2017 Nov 3;358(6363):652-655
pubmed: 28971970
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Nov 21;15(148):
pubmed: 30464058
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 22;104(21):8714-9
pubmed: 17517663
Science. 2003 Apr 25;300(5619):597-603
pubmed: 12714734
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13296-301
pubmed: 26371302
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1082-111
pubmed: 12395296
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 22;269(1493):793-9
pubmed: 11958710
Naturwissenschaften. 2006 Apr;93(4):189-94
pubmed: 16514514
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 May 08;280(1762):20130695
pubmed: 23658203
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):13428-9
pubmed: 26512098
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Sep;70(3 Pt 1):031913
pubmed: 15524555
Nature. 2015 Dec 24;528(7583):499-503
pubmed: 26595274
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11229
pubmed: 28894281
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 13;109(46):18669-73
pubmed: 23112147
J R Soc Interface. 2015 May 6;12(106):
pubmed: 25977959
Cell. 2017 Sep 21;171(1):59-71.e21
pubmed: 28938123