Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.
Aged
Atrial Fibrillation
/ therapy
Catheter Ablation
/ methods
Disease-Free Survival
Electrocardiography, Ambulatory
/ methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Atria
/ pathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
ROC Curve
Recurrence
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 05 2019
08 05 2019
Historique:
received:
18
02
2019
accepted:
25
04
2019
entrez:
10
5
2019
pubmed:
10
5
2019
medline:
28
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. The aim of current analysis was to investigate the time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after AF catheter ablation during long-term follow-up. The study included 879 patients (61 ± 10 years; 64% males; 39% persistent AF) undergoing first AF catheter ablation. Rhythm outcomes were documented using 7-days Holter monitoring. The APPLE score (Age, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR, Left atrium (LA), EF) was calculated at baseline, while MB-LATER score (Male gender, Bundle branch block, LA, AF Type, Early Recurrences) 3 months after ablation. The median follow-up time was 37 months [95%CI 35;39]. ERAF and LRAF occurred in 45% and 64%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, ERAF (HR 2.095, 95%CI 1.762-2.490, p < 0.001) was strongly associated with LRAF. The APPLE (HR 1.385, 95%CI 1.276-1.505, p < 0.001) and MB-LATER (HR 1.326, 95%CI 1.239-1.419, p < 0.001) scores significantly predicted LRAF during follow-up. On the ROC analysis, APPLE (AUC 0.640, 95%CI 0.602-0.677, p < 0.001) and MB-LATER (AUC 0.654, 95%CI 0.616-0.691, p < 0.001) demonstrated moderate prediction. Summarizing, ERAF was the strongest predictor for LRAF in time-dependent manner. The APPLE and MB-LATER scores demonstrated moderate prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long term follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31068651
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43644-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-43644-2
pmc: PMC6506496
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7112Références
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1984-9
pubmed: 22626840
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004 Jun;10(3):221-6
pubmed: 15133358
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 5;169(3):201-6
pubmed: 24063932
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Nov;13(11):2119-2125
pubmed: 27435586
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f428-f435
pubmed: 29016770
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Oct;104(10):871-6
pubmed: 25876528
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1609-1678
pubmed: 27567465
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):202-7
pubmed: 23813452
Heart. 2012 Jan;98(1):48-53
pubmed: 21930724
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 23;8(1):12686
pubmed: 30139967
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66
pubmed: 9725923
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 20;7:40828
pubmed: 28106147
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun 1;5(3):514-20
pubmed: 22550126
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169933
pubmed: 28085921
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;3(1):32-8
pubmed: 19995881
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Mar 15;101(6):843-7
pubmed: 18328850
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1002-1009
pubmed: 29659784
Circ J. 2013;77(9):2271-9
pubmed: 23759661
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;7(2):281-7
pubmed: 24610790
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Sep;7(9):1282-90
pubmed: 20466075
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):320-329
pubmed: 30578568
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Mar 18;2(2):e004549
pubmed: 23537812
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Oct;4(5):615-21
pubmed: 21841192