Right on track? Performance of satellite telemetry in terrestrial wildlife research.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
18
11
2018
accepted:
15
04
2019
entrez:
10
5
2019
pubmed:
10
5
2019
medline:
15
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Satellite telemetry is an increasingly utilized technology in wildlife research, and current devices can track individual animal movements at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolutions. However, as we enter the golden age of satellite telemetry, we need an in-depth understanding of the main technological, species-specific and environmental factors that determine the success and failure of satellite tracking devices across species and habitats. Here, we assess the relative influence of such factors on the ability of satellite telemetry units to provide the expected amount and quality of data by analyzing data from over 3,000 devices deployed on 62 terrestrial species in 167 projects worldwide. We evaluate the success rate in obtaining GPS fixes as well as in transferring these fixes to the user and we evaluate failure rates. Average fix success and data transfer rates were high and were generally better predicted by species and unit characteristics, while environmental characteristics influenced the variability of performance. However, 48% of the unit deployments ended prematurely, half of them due to technical failure. Nonetheless, this study shows that the performance of satellite telemetry applications has shown improvements over time, and based on our findings, we provide further recommendations for both users and manufacturers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31071155
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216223
pii: PONE-D-18-33139
pmc: PMC6508664
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0216223Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: SN is employed by D.R.E.Am. Italia. JAM received funding from Bank of America, SCS from CIC Schweiz, FCA and FGL from Consórcio Capim Branco de Energia, and PK, BB, JCP from Sustainability East Asia LLC and Oyu Tolgoi mine. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Oecologia. 2018 May;187(1):47-60
pubmed: 29610976
Wildl Biol Pract. 2010 Dec;6(2):108-126
pubmed: 22003358
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 27;365(1550):2187-200
pubmed: 20566496
Ecol Lett. 2009 May;12(5):395-408
pubmed: 19379134
Nature. 2013 Jun 13;498(7453):185-9
pubmed: 23765495
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 27;365(1550):2157-62
pubmed: 20566493
Ecology. 2009 Oct;90(10):2956-62
pubmed: 19886504
Mov Ecol. 2016 Jun 01;4:15
pubmed: 27252856
Am J Primatol. 1998;46(2):167-72
pubmed: 9773679
Science. 2018 Jan 26;359(6374):466-469
pubmed: 29371471
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 29;7:11033
pubmed: 27023355
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Nov 15;534:79-84
pubmed: 25669144
Rev Biol Trop. 2016 Dec;64(4):1441-50
pubmed: 29465908
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 27;365(1550):2163-76
pubmed: 20566494
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 09;8(7):e68496
pubmed: 23874645
Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):aaa2478
pubmed: 26068858
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):54-68
pubmed: 26412564
Ecol Appl. 2009 Dec;19(8):2016-25
pubmed: 20014575
Mov Ecol. 2015 Sep 15;3(1):23
pubmed: 26380711
Mov Ecol. 2016 Sep 01;4(1):21
pubmed: 27595001
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 23;8(4):e61623
pubmed: 23626706