Utility of an Automated Radiology-Pathology Feedback Tool.


Journal

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 12 10 2018
revised: 20 02 2019
accepted: 10 03 2019
pubmed: 11 5 2019
medline: 22 7 2020
entrez: 11 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine the utility of an automated radiology-pathology feedback tool. We previously developed a tool that automatically provides radiologists with pathology results related to imaging examinations they interpreted. The tool also allows radiologists to mark the results as concordant or discordant. Five abdominal radiologists prospectively scored their own discordant results related to their previously interpreted abdominal ultrasound, CT, and MR interpretations between August 2017 and June 2018. Radiologists recorded whether they would have followed up on the case if there was no automated alert, reason for the discordance, whether the result required further action, prompted imaging rereview, influenced future interpretations, enhanced teaching files, or inspired a research idea. There were 234 total discordances (range 30-66 per radiologist), and 70.5% (165 of 234) of discordances would not have been manually followed up in the absence of the automated tool. Reasons for discordances included missed findings (10.7%; 25 of 234), misinterpreted findings (29.1%; 68 of 234), possible biopsy sampling error (13.3%; 31 of 234), and limitations of imaging techniques (32.1%; 75/234). In addition, 4.7% (11 of 234) required further radiologist action, including report addenda or discussion with referrer or pathologist, and 93.2% (218 of 234) prompted radiologists to rereview the images. Radiologists reported that they learned from 88% (206 of 234) of discordances, 38.6% (90 of 233) of discordances probably or definitely influenced future interpretations, 55.6% (130 of 234) of discordances prompted the radiologist to add the case to his or her teaching files, and 13.7% (32 of 233) inspired a research idea. Automated pathology feedback provides a valuable opportunity for radiologists across experience levels to learn, increase their skill, and improve patient care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31072775
pii: S1546-1440(19)30304-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.03.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1211-1217

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ankur M Doshi (AM)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: ankur.doshi@nyumc.org.

Chenchan Huang (C)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Kira Melamud (K)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Krishna Shanbhogue (K)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Chrystia Slywotsky (C)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Myles Taffel (M)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

William Moore (W)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Michael Recht (M)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Danny Kim (D)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH