Karst dolines provide diverse microhabitats for different functional groups in multiple phyla.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 05 2019
09 05 2019
Historique:
received:
09
03
2018
accepted:
26
04
2019
entrez:
11
5
2019
pubmed:
11
5
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fine-scale topographic complexity creates important microclimates that can facilitate species to grow outside their main distributional range and increase biodiversity locally. Enclosed depressions in karst landscapes ('dolines') are topographically complex environments which produce microclimates that are drier and warmer (equator-facing slopes) and cooler and moister (pole-facing slopes and depression bottoms) than the surrounding climate. We show that the distribution patterns of functional groups for organisms in two different phyla, Arthropoda (ants) and Tracheophyta (vascular plants), mirror this variation of microclimate. We found that north-facing slopes and bottoms of solution dolines in northern Hungary provided key habitats for ant and plant species associated with cooler and/or moister conditions. Contrarily, south-facing slopes of dolines provided key habitats for species associated with warmer and/or drier conditions. Species occurring on the surrounding plateau were associated with intermediate conditions. We conclude that karst dolines provide a diversity of microclimatic habitats that may facilitate the persistence of taxa with diverse environmental preferences, indicating these dolines to be potential safe havens for multiple phyla under local and global climate oscillations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31073136
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43603-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-43603-x
pmc: PMC6509348
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7176Références
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 May;19(5):1470-81
pubmed: 23504984
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):4014-4027
pubmed: 27081931
Zootaxa. 2014 Jun 23;3821(3):321-36
pubmed: 24989747
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 May;30(5):233-4
pubmed: 25683027
Science. 2002 Sep 20;297(5589):2009-10
pubmed: 12242431
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Aug;23(8):2941-2961
pubmed: 28318131
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0183106
pubmed: 28806772
Oecologia. 2002 Oct;133(2):168-175
pubmed: 28547303
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0122070
pubmed: 25793871
Ecol Lett. 2005 Nov;8(11):1138-46
pubmed: 21352437
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Apr;9(4):150-3
pubmed: 21236804
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jan;23(1):256-268
pubmed: 27151406
Ecol Lett. 2014 Jul;17(7):866-80
pubmed: 24751205
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 26;7(1):4249
pubmed: 28652612
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Feb;19(2):473-83
pubmed: 23504785
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 10;11(8):e0159909
pubmed: 27509088
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jun;23(6):2218-2229
pubmed: 27626183
Ann Bot. 2018 Nov 30;122(6):927-934
pubmed: 30239590
Ecol Lett. 2012 Apr;15(4):365-377
pubmed: 22257223
Ann Bot. 2017 Jan;119(2):301-309
pubmed: 28025290
Ann Bot. 2017 Jan;119(2):289-300
pubmed: 27634576
J Environ Biol. 2010 Jan-Mar;31(1-2):51-60
pubmed: 20648813