Confidence as a diagnostic tool for perceptual aftereffects.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 05 2019
09 05 2019
Historique:
received:
08
08
2018
accepted:
17
04
2019
entrez:
11
5
2019
pubmed:
11
5
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Perceptual judgements are, by nature, a product both of sensation and the cognitive processes responsible for interpreting and reporting subjective experiences. Changed perceptual judgements may thus result from changes in how the world appears (perception), or subsequent interpretation (judgement). This ambiguity has led to persistent debates about how to interpret changes in decision-making, and if higher-order cognitions can change how the world looks, or sounds, or feels. Here we introduce an approach that can help resolve these ambiguities. In three motion-direction experiments, we measured perceptual judgements and subjective confidence. We show that each measure is sensitive to sensory information and can index sensory adaptation. Each measure is also sensitive to decision biases, but response bias impacts the central tendency of decision and confidence distributions differently. Our findings show that subjective confidence, when measured in addition to perceptual decisions, can supply important diagnostic information about the cause of aftereffects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31073187
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43170-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-43170-1
pmc: PMC6509108
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7124Références
Curr Biol. 2013 Feb 4;23(3):250-4
pubmed: 23313360
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 8;28(19):3128-3135.e8
pubmed: 30220502
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jul;7(7):773-8
pubmed: 15195098
J Vis. 2018 Aug 1;18(8):10
pubmed: 30140892
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):147-52
pubmed: 20424036
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):185-93
pubmed: 22033949
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1280-6
pubmed: 22492746
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):455-73
pubmed: 26173123
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;88(6):3469-76
pubmed: 12466461
Vision Res. 2012 Jul 1;64:7-16
pubmed: 22569398
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e229
pubmed: 26189677
J Vis. 2013 Jul 31;13(8):
pubmed: 23902752
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 15;8:443
pubmed: 25076880
Neuron. 2014 Jan 8;81(1):195-206
pubmed: 24333055
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Aug;17(4):423-9
pubmed: 17714934
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Aug;49(10):2929-34
pubmed: 21726570
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
Curr Biol. 2017 Feb 20;27(4):590-595
pubmed: 28162897
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2418-2429
pubmed: 29371318
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1518-31
pubmed: 21807537
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1310-21
pubmed: 22492749
J Neurosci. 2013 Sep 11;33(37):14633-7
pubmed: 24027264
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Mar;21(1):422-30
pubmed: 22071269
Neural Comput. 2009 Dec;21(12):3271-304
pubmed: 19686064
Psychol Sci. 2012 Apr;23(4):407-9
pubmed: 22395128
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):738-43
pubmed: 24686785
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Jun;22(3):341-65; discussion 366-423
pubmed: 11301517
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 19;6:157
pubmed: 25745407
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Dec 02;2(12):150418
pubmed: 27019726
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 30;8:54
pubmed: 28194123
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):38-46
pubmed: 24297777
Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(25-26):3109-16
pubmed: 16023173
Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(25):3125-31
pubmed: 17936871
J Vis. 2014 Jan 08;14(1):
pubmed: 24403393
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 8;108(45):E1080-8
pubmed: 21709221
J Vis. 2015;15(9):4
pubmed: 26161633
Nature. 1963 Dec 28;200:1345-7
pubmed: 14098503
Psychol Bull. 1984 Jan;95(1):109-33
pubmed: 6544431
Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;19(3):276-83
pubmed: 18315801