Artifact removal from neurophysiological signals: impact on intracranial and arterial pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury.

cerebral hypoperfusion convolutional neural network intracranial pressure stacked convolutional autoencoder traumatic brain injury

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 May 2019
Historique:
received: 18 09 2018
accepted: 12 02 2019
pubmed: 11 5 2019
medline: 11 5 2019
entrez: 11 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Monitoring intracranial and arterial blood pressure (ICP and ABP, respectively) provides crucial information regarding the neurological status of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, these signals are often heavily affected by artifacts, which may significantly reduce the reliability of the clinical determinations derived from the signals. The goal of this work was to eliminate signal artifacts from continuous ICP and ABP monitoring via deep learning techniques and to assess the changes in the prognostic capacities of clinical parameters after artifact elimination. The first 24 hours of monitoring ICP and ABP in a total of 309 patients with TBI was retrospectively analyzed. An artifact elimination model for ICP and ABP was constructed via a stacked convolutional autoencoder (SCAE) and convolutional neural network (CNN) with 10-fold cross-validation tests. The prevalence and prognostic capacity of ICP- and ABP-related clinical events were compared before and after artifact elimination. The proposed SCAE-CNN model exhibited reliable accuracy in eliminating ABP and ICP artifacts (net prediction rates of 97% and 94%, respectively). The prevalence of ICP- and ABP-related clinical events (i.e., systemic hypotension, intracranial hypertension, cerebral hypoperfusion, and poor cerebrovascular reactivity) all decreased significantly after artifact removal. The SCAE-CNN model can be reliably used to eliminate artifacts, which significantly improves the reliability and efficacy of ICP- and ABP-derived clinical parameters for prognostic determinations after TBI.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31075774
doi: 10.3171/2019.2.JNS182260
pii: 2019.2.JNS182260
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1952-1960

Auteurs

Seung-Bo Lee (SB)

1Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

Hakseung Kim (H)

1Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

Young-Tak Kim (YT)

1Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

Frederick A Zeiler (FA)

2Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Peter Smielewski (P)

3Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; and.

Marek Czosnyka (M)

3Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; and.
4Institute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.

Dong-Joo Kim (DJ)

1Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

Classifications MeSH