Patient-centered communication, patient satisfaction, and retention in care in assisted reproductive technology visits.
Assisted reproductive technology
Doctor-patient interaction
Patient-centered communication
RIAS
Retention in care
Satisfaction
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
12
11
2018
accepted:
28
04
2019
pubmed:
12
5
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
12
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To explore the association between patient-centered communication, patients' satisfaction, and retention in care in assisted reproductive technology (ART) visits. ART visits at eight Italian clinics were videotaped and coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System, which includes a Patient-Centered Index (PCI), a summary "patient-centered communication" ratio. After the visit, patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire (SATQ). After 3 months, patients were asked about their retention in care. Spearman correlations and Mann-Whitney tests were used to test associations between the study variables; the open-ended item of SATQ was analyzed through content analysis. Eighty-five visits were videotaped (involving 28 gynecologists and 160 patients). PCI score (μ = 0.51 ± 0.28) revealed a more disease-oriented communication during the visit. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the visit and identified in the information provision or in the doctor's humanity or kindness the main reasons of satisfaction. At the follow-up, the majority of the couples declared to have followed the clinicians' recommendations and to have remained related to the ART center. No associations were found among the study variables, except for a lower male satisfaction among couples who declared to have changed ART clinic. Contrary to what was expected, the style of physician-patient communication was not found to be associated with patient satisfaction and retention in care. However, patients were highly satisfied and engaged. The actual meaning of a communication that is "patient-centered" in the ART context might be wider, including the couples' need for information, as suggested by qualitative findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31077010
doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01466-1
pii: 10.1007/s10815-019-01466-1
pmc: PMC6603100
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1135-1142Références
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jul;55(2):283-99
pubmed: 12144142
Fertil Res Pract. 2016 Apr 2;2:6
pubmed: 28620533
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1202-8
pubmed: 9794859
Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):3127-35
pubmed: 19783833
Fam Pract. 1998 Oct;15(5):480-92
pubmed: 9848436
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1085-95
pubmed: 21376443
Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):488-95
pubmed: 22108249
Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2462-72
pubmed: 23820421
Hum Reprod. 2018 May 1;33(5):877-886
pubmed: 29635461
Annu Rev Public Health. 1989;10:163-80
pubmed: 2655629
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Aug;70(4):351-79
pubmed: 23169897
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Apr;46(4):243-51
pubmed: 11932123
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2177-86
pubmed: 23697840
Reprod Health. 2017 Sep 7;14(1):114
pubmed: 28882134
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Oct;59(1):38-45
pubmed: 16198217
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295-301
pubmed: 19150199
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:147-53
pubmed: 24034962
Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2318-31
pubmed: 23842560
Med Care. 1985 May;23(5):521-38
pubmed: 4010349
Hum Reprod. 1998 Jul;13(7):1831-6
pubmed: 9740434
Hum Reprod. 1999 Mar;14(3):581-5
pubmed: 10221678
Arch Fam Med. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):279-83
pubmed: 9161356
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):711-6
pubmed: 10756612
Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):27-36
pubmed: 16940360
Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):276
pubmed: 14967357
Fam Pract. 1986 Mar;3(1):24-30
pubmed: 3956899
Hum Reprod. 2003 Dec;18(12):2638-46
pubmed: 14645185
Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jan;39(1):1-3
pubmed: 11013542
Hum Reprod. 2010 Oct;25(10):2516-26
pubmed: 20719811
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Dec;13(5):361-7
pubmed: 19674935
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jul;53(1):123-33
pubmed: 11380158
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Dec;70(6):567-96
pubmed: 23894060
J Fam Pract. 1998 Sep;47(3):213-20
pubmed: 9752374
Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):827-33
pubmed: 21317152
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jun 5;134(11):1079-85
pubmed: 11388827
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 May 1;23(3):322-337
pubmed: 28164236
Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):584-93
pubmed: 21227936
BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):444-5
pubmed: 11222407
Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):652-69
pubmed: 22869759
Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5):467-87
pubmed: 20223789
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):646-54
pubmed: 24007764
Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):987-96
pubmed: 23411619