Pancreatitis Incidence in the Exenatide BID, Exenatide QW, and Exenatide QW Suspension Development Programs: Pooled Analysis of 35 Clinical Trials.
Exenatide
Pancreatitis
Pooled analysis
Journal
Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
ISSN: 1869-6953
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101539025
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
18
01
2019
pubmed:
12
5
2019
medline:
12
5
2019
entrez:
12
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus; however, there have been concerns that GLP-1RA treatment may be associated with an increased incidence of pancreatitis. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of pancreatitis in a pooled population of type 2 diabetes trials from the clinical development program of the GLP-1RA exenatide as well as to describe patient-level data for all reported cases. The primary analysis examined pooled data among patients with type 2 diabetes from the controlled arms of 35 trials (ranging from 4 to 234 weeks' duration) in the integrated clinical databases for exenatide twice daily, once weekly, and once-weekly suspension, excluding comparator arms with other incretin-based therapies. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) of pancreatitis was calculated for exenatide and non-exenatide (non-incretin-based therapy or placebo) treatment groups. Patient-level data were described for all pancreatitis incidences. The primary analysis included 5596 patients who received exenatide and 4462 in the non-exenatide group. The mean duration of study medication exposure for the exenatide and non-exenatide treatment groups was 57.0 and 47.9 weeks, respectively. Pancreatitis was diagnosed in 14 patients (exenatide, n = 8; non-exenatide, n = 6), of whom 13 recovered with or without sequelae. The pancreatitis EAIR was 0.1195 events per 100 patient-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.0516-0.2154] in the exenatide group versus 0.1276 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI 0.0468-0.2482) in the non-exenatide treatment group. The EAIR ratio for the exenatide versus non-exenatide treatment group was 0.761 (95% CI 0.231-2.510). In this pooled analysis of 10,058 patients among studies comparing exenatide with other glucose-lowering medications or placebo, pancreatitis was rare. The EAIRs of pancreatitis were low and similar between exenatide and non-exenatide treatment groups. No evidence of an association between exenatide and pancreatitis was observed. Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. Plain language summary available for this article.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31077072
doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0627-1
pii: 10.1007/s13300-019-0627-1
pmc: PMC6612359
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1249-1270Références
Diabetes Care. 2004 Nov;27(11):2628-35
pubmed: 15504997
Diabetes Care. 2005 May;28(5):1092-100
pubmed: 15855572
Regul Pept. 2008 Nov 29;151(1-3):123-9
pubmed: 18675854
Diabetes Care. 2009 May;32(5):834-8
pubmed: 19208917
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):1019-27
pubmed: 19278373
Diabetes. 2009 Sep;58(9):2148-61
pubmed: 19509017
Diabetologia. 2010 Jan;53(1):153-9
pubmed: 19756486
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Jun;64(7):984-90
pubmed: 20412332
Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2349-54
pubmed: 20682680
Diabetes Care. 2010 Dec;33(12):2580-5
pubmed: 20833867
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Jun;13(6):559-66
pubmed: 21320263
Diabetes. 2012 May;61(5):1250-62
pubmed: 22266668
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2012;5:29-41
pubmed: 22375098
Diabet Med. 2012 Nov;29(11):1412-8
pubmed: 22416857
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Oct;14(10):904-11
pubmed: 22845701
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Nov;98(2):271-84
pubmed: 23010561
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 May;15(5):417-26
pubmed: 23163898
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 8;173(7):534-9
pubmed: 23440284
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Jan;16(1):48-56
pubmed: 23837679
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Dec;29(12):1577-86
pubmed: 23981106
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1317-26
pubmed: 23992601
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1327-35
pubmed: 23992602
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Mar;16(3):273-5
pubmed: 24199745
Diabetes. 2014 Apr;63(4):1303-14
pubmed: 24222349
Acta Diabetol. 2014;51(3):491-7
pubmed: 24352344
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;103(2):269-75
pubmed: 24485345
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 27;370(9):794-7
pubmed: 24571751
Diabetologia. 2014 Jul;57(7):1320-4
pubmed: 24723174
BMJ. 2014 Apr 15;348:g2366
pubmed: 24736555
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):430-4
pubmed: 25146418
Endocrine. 2015 Mar;48(2):461-71
pubmed: 25146552
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Jan;17(1):32-41
pubmed: 25200423
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jun;38(6):1058-66
pubmed: 25504028
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jun;38(6):1089-98
pubmed: 25633664
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):232-42
pubmed: 26052984
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2015 May 18;8:241-53
pubmed: 26056482
Toxicol Pathol. 2015 Dec;43(8):1093-102
pubmed: 26269615
Ann Med. 2015;47(7):561-9
pubmed: 26426676
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jan;27:76-9
pubmed: 26433909
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Mar;18(3):295-9
pubmed: 26510994
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(43):e1906
pubmed: 26512613
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2247-57
pubmed: 26630143
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(7):e2603
pubmed: 26886601
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22
pubmed: 27295427
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Nov;18(11):677-686
pubmed: 27525540
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844
pubmed: 27633186
Diabetes Metab. 2017 Feb;43(1):48-58
pubmed: 27745828
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jun;19(6):906-908
pubmed: 28105738
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Sep;19(9):1233-1241
pubmed: 28244632
Diabetes Care. 2017 May;40(5):647-654
pubmed: 28283565
Am Heart J. 2017 May;187:1-9
pubmed: 28454792
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):966-972
pubmed: 28476871
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):42-49
pubmed: 28573765
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 28;377(13):1228-1239
pubmed: 28910237
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;6(2):105-113
pubmed: 29221659
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S73-S85
pubmed: 29222379
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 15;8(1):782
pubmed: 29335646
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018 Nov;34(8):e3061
pubmed: 30109766