Primary debulking surgery vs. interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: review of the literature and meta-analysis.


Journal

Minerva medica
ISSN: 1827-1669
Titre abrégé: Minerva Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0400732

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 14 5 2019
medline: 25 7 2019
entrez: 14 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the seventh most common cancer among women in the world and the leading cause of death from gynecological malignancies. The standard treatment for advanced EOC consists of optimal primary debulking surgery (PDS) associated with an adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) have been proposed in the management of advanced EOC to increase the rate of complete citoreductive surgery and to reduce morbidity and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis is conducted to compare the oncologic and postoperative outcomes of NACT and IDS with PDS followed by chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer. We conducted a search on the electronic databases PubMed/Medline, Cochrane and Scopus. All randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies comparing PDS and IDS in ovarian cancer published in English until 28 February 2019 were considered eligible. Twenty studies were included in the systematic review. As regards the meta-analysis, only studies that allowed the data we needed to be extracted were included: five were included for the evaluation of overall survival (OS) and PFS and 9 for the evaluation of major postoperative complications and days of hospital stay. From the meta-analysis of the current available literature, none of the two investigated procedures has proven to be superior in terms of OS and PFS in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. However surgical complexity and postoperative complications are reduced in the IDS group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31081304
pii: S0026-4806.19.06078-6
doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.19.06078-6
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

330-340

Auteurs

Benito Chiofalo (B)

Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy - benitochiofalo@me.com.

Simone Bruni (S)

Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Camilla Certelli (C)

Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Isabella Sperduti (I)

Unit of Biostatistical, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Ermelinda Baiocco (E)

Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Enrico Vizza (E)

Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH