Predicting anxiety from wholebrain activity patterns to emotional faces in young adults: a machine learning approach.


Journal

NeuroImage. Clinical
ISSN: 2213-1582
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage Clin
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101597070

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 13 11 2018
revised: 04 03 2019
accepted: 02 04 2019
pubmed: 15 5 2019
medline: 3 4 2020
entrez: 15 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

It is becoming increasingly clear that pathophysiological processes underlying psychiatric disorders categories are heterogeneous on many levels, including symptoms, disease course, comorbidity and biological underpinnings. This heterogeneity poses challenges for identifying biological markers associated with dimensions of symptoms and behaviour that could provide targets to guide treatment choice and novel treatment. In response, the research domain criteria (RDoC) (Insel et al., 2010) was developed to advocate a dimensional approach which omits any disease definitions, disorder thresholds, or cut-points for various levels of psychopathology to understanding the pathophysiological processes underlying psychiatry disorders. In the present study we aimed to apply pattern regression analysis to identify brain signatures during dynamic emotional face processing that are predictive of anxiety and depression symptoms in a continuum that ranges from normal to pathological levels, cutting across categorically-defined diagnoses. The sample was composed of one-hundred and fifty-four young adults (mean age=21.6 and s.d.=2.0, 103 females) consisting of eighty-two young adults seeking treatment for psychological distress that cut across categorically-defined diagnoses and 72 matched healthy young adults. Participants performed a dynamic face task involving fearful, angry and happy faces (and geometric shapes) while undergoing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Pattern regression analyses consisted of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) implemented in the Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging toolbox (PRoNTo). Predicted and actual clinical scores were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and normalized mean squared error (MSE) to evaluate the models' performance. Permutation test was applied to estimate significance levels. GPR identified patterns of neural activity to dynamic emotional face processing predictive of self-report anxiety in the whole sample, which covered a continuum that ranged from healthy to different levels of distress, including subthreshold to fully-syndromal psychiatric diagnoses. Results were significant using two different cross validation strategies (two-fold: r=0.28 (p-value=0.001), MSE=4.47 (p-value=0.001) and five fold r=0.28 (p-value=0.002), MSE=4.62 (p-value=0.003). The contributions of individual regions to the predictive model were very small, demonstrating that predictions were based on the overall pattern rather than on a small combination of regions. These findings represent early evidence that neuroimaging techniques may inform clinical assessment of young adults irrespective of diagnoses by allowing accurate and objective quantitative estimation of psychopathology.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
It is becoming increasingly clear that pathophysiological processes underlying psychiatric disorders categories are heterogeneous on many levels, including symptoms, disease course, comorbidity and biological underpinnings. This heterogeneity poses challenges for identifying biological markers associated with dimensions of symptoms and behaviour that could provide targets to guide treatment choice and novel treatment. In response, the research domain criteria (RDoC) (Insel et al., 2010) was developed to advocate a dimensional approach which omits any disease definitions, disorder thresholds, or cut-points for various levels of psychopathology to understanding the pathophysiological processes underlying psychiatry disorders. In the present study we aimed to apply pattern regression analysis to identify brain signatures during dynamic emotional face processing that are predictive of anxiety and depression symptoms in a continuum that ranges from normal to pathological levels, cutting across categorically-defined diagnoses.
METHODS
The sample was composed of one-hundred and fifty-four young adults (mean age=21.6 and s.d.=2.0, 103 females) consisting of eighty-two young adults seeking treatment for psychological distress that cut across categorically-defined diagnoses and 72 matched healthy young adults. Participants performed a dynamic face task involving fearful, angry and happy faces (and geometric shapes) while undergoing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Pattern regression analyses consisted of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) implemented in the Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging toolbox (PRoNTo). Predicted and actual clinical scores were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and normalized mean squared error (MSE) to evaluate the models' performance. Permutation test was applied to estimate significance levels.
RESULTS
GPR identified patterns of neural activity to dynamic emotional face processing predictive of self-report anxiety in the whole sample, which covered a continuum that ranged from healthy to different levels of distress, including subthreshold to fully-syndromal psychiatric diagnoses. Results were significant using two different cross validation strategies (two-fold: r=0.28 (p-value=0.001), MSE=4.47 (p-value=0.001) and five fold r=0.28 (p-value=0.002), MSE=4.62 (p-value=0.003). The contributions of individual regions to the predictive model were very small, demonstrating that predictions were based on the overall pattern rather than on a small combination of regions.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings represent early evidence that neuroimaging techniques may inform clinical assessment of young adults irrespective of diagnoses by allowing accurate and objective quantitative estimation of psychopathology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31082774
pii: S2213-1582(19)30163-9
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101813
pmc: PMC6517640
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101813

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH100041
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R37 MH100041
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT102845/Z/13/Z
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Depress Anxiety. 2017 Jul;34(7):621-631
pubmed: 28453905
Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2011 Nov 07;1(1):10
pubmed: 22738433
J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Aug;100(3):316-36
pubmed: 1918611
Compr Psychiatry. 2000 Mar-Apr;41(2 Suppl 1):8-13
pubmed: 10746898
Brain. 2015 Sep;138(Pt 9):2777-90
pubmed: 26112339
J Anxiety Disord. 2004;18(5):587-607
pubmed: 15275941
Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-5
pubmed: 13638508
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Sep;3(9):798-808
pubmed: 29789268
Depress Anxiety. 2001;14(2):94-104
pubmed: 11668662
Psychiatry Res. 2001 May 10;102(1):73-85
pubmed: 11368842
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;164(2):318-27
pubmed: 17267796
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 18;7(4):e1096
pubmed: 28418404
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jan 23;10:619
pubmed: 28167896
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 15;145(Pt B):246-253
pubmed: 27421184
Front Neuroinform. 2011 Aug 22;5:13
pubmed: 21897815
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;167(7):748-51
pubmed: 20595427
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Dec;29(12):1043-9
pubmed: 22933451
Psychol Med. 2013 Feb;43(2):293-302
pubmed: 22571805
Psychol Med. 2014 Nov;44(15):3239-48
pubmed: 25066202
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 28;9(8):e105169
pubmed: 25166022
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jul;216:123-135
pubmed: 27554605
Front Neurosci. 2011 Jun 15;5:75
pubmed: 21720520
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):90-101
pubmed: 17560126
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):494-504
pubmed: 16351373
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):725-32
pubmed: 17704814
Psychol Med. 2011 Nov;41(11):2253-64
pubmed: 21557888
Neuron. 2015 Jan 7;85(1):11-26
pubmed: 25569345
Psychol Med. 2006 Dec;36(12):1671-80
pubmed: 16907995
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):523-34
pubmed: 16791142
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 15;77(4):385-93
pubmed: 25444162
Neuroinformatics. 2013 Jul;11(3):319-37
pubmed: 23417655
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;165(9):1193-202
pubmed: 18483136
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 25;7(7):e1178
pubmed: 28742077
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101796
pubmed: 30935858
Neuroinformatics. 2018 Jan;16(1):117-143
pubmed: 29297140
BMC Med. 2013 May 14;11:126
pubmed: 23672542
J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Feb;110(1):40-8
pubmed: 11261398
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):1233-9
pubmed: 12880848
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar;14(1):29-37
pubmed: 22577302
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Aug 15;168(3):242-9
pubmed: 19564050
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:94-100
pubmed: 27756046
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2524-33
pubmed: 20951215
Mol Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;17(12):1174-9
pubmed: 22869033
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 15;145(Pt B):337-345
pubmed: 26767946
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jul 15;60(2):93-105
pubmed: 16406007
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 15;87:96-110
pubmed: 24239590
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 05;11(1):e0117603
pubmed: 26731403
Nat Med. 2017 Jan;23(1):28-38
pubmed: 27918562
Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1405-13
pubmed: 20347044
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009 Nov;34(6):418-32
pubmed: 19949718
Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):946-63
pubmed: 11107884
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Jan 23;11:115-26
pubmed: 25670901
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;49(3):255-65
pubmed: 25392340
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 15;150:23-49
pubmed: 28143776
Compr Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;51(3):224-35
pubmed: 20399331
Science. 2015 May 1;348(6234):499-500
pubmed: 25931539
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Sep;1(5):433-447
pubmed: 27642641
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Nov;119(4):631-9
pubmed: 20939653
Br J Psychol. 1970 Aug;61(3):303-21
pubmed: 5457503
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;163(7):1135-6
pubmed: 16816214
Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 15;110:48-59
pubmed: 25623501

Auteurs

Liana C L Portugal (LCL)

Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Federal Fluminense University, Niteroi, Brazil. Electronic address: lianalportugal@gmail.com.

Jessica Schrouff (J)

Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, United Kingdom; Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, United Kingdom.

Ricki Stiffler (R)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.

Michele Bertocci (M)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.

Genna Bebko (G)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.

Henry Chase (H)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.

Jeanette Lockovitch (J)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.

Haris Aslam (H)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.

Simona Graur (S)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.

Tsafrir Greenberg (T)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.

Mirtes Pereira (M)

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Federal Fluminense University, Niteroi, Brazil.

Leticia Oliveira (L)

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Federal Fluminense University, Niteroi, Brazil.

Mary Phillips (M)

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Janaina Mourão-Miranda (J)

Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, United Kingdom; Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH