Optimal Retention Force of Audio Processor Magnets.


Journal

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
ISSN: 1537-4505
Titre abrégé: Otol Neurotol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100961504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
entrez: 15 5 2019
pubmed: 15 5 2019
medline: 21 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Audio processor magnets used in transcutaneous active hearing implants vary in retention force. We hypothesized that a range of optimal magnetic retention forces could be derived, based on objective in-situ measurements of individual retention forces. The magnetic force required to retain the proper placement of transcutaneous active hearing implants varies among patients. Currently, audiologists rely on personal experience in deciding which magnet to use. Insufficient force causes frequent loss of the single-unit processors or external coils of behind-the-ear devices, and excessive force causes pain and skin irritations. We experimentally determined magnetic retention force as a function of the distance between two magnets for different processor-implant magnet combinations. In addition, we studied individual in situ retention forces in 100 patients with hearing devices. Skin status was evaluated by a physician and assessed by patient self-reporting and a questionnaire. Force-distance functions showed that different magnet strengths had differential effects only at distances less than 6 mm. Examiner and patient skin status assessments and comfort scores showed that optimal retention force range was 0.23 to 0.4 N. We found that the currently available magnet types restrict the range of feasible skin flap thicknesses to a maximum of 6 mm. Further we conclude that retention forces between 0.23 and 0.4 N could provide the appropriate trade-off between the risk of losing device fixation and of causing skin irritations. We recommend measuring the retention force in all patients.

Sections du résumé

HYPOTHESIS
Audio processor magnets used in transcutaneous active hearing implants vary in retention force. We hypothesized that a range of optimal magnetic retention forces could be derived, based on objective in-situ measurements of individual retention forces.
BACKGROUND
The magnetic force required to retain the proper placement of transcutaneous active hearing implants varies among patients. Currently, audiologists rely on personal experience in deciding which magnet to use. Insufficient force causes frequent loss of the single-unit processors or external coils of behind-the-ear devices, and excessive force causes pain and skin irritations.
METHODS
We experimentally determined magnetic retention force as a function of the distance between two magnets for different processor-implant magnet combinations. In addition, we studied individual in situ retention forces in 100 patients with hearing devices. Skin status was evaluated by a physician and assessed by patient self-reporting and a questionnaire.
RESULTS
Force-distance functions showed that different magnet strengths had differential effects only at distances less than 6 mm. Examiner and patient skin status assessments and comfort scores showed that optimal retention force range was 0.23 to 0.4 N.
CONCLUSION
We found that the currently available magnet types restrict the range of feasible skin flap thicknesses to a maximum of 6 mm. Further we conclude that retention forces between 0.23 and 0.4 N could provide the appropriate trade-off between the risk of losing device fixation and of causing skin irritations. We recommend measuring the retention force in all patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31083075
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002201
pii: 00129492-201906000-00004
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e482-e487

Auteurs

Luise Wagner (L)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH