Evaluation of symptomatic reflux esophagitis in proton pump inhibitor users.

Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease gastro-esophageal reflux disease potassium-competitive acid blocker proton pump inhibitor reflux esophagitis symptomatic reflux esophagitis

Journal

Biomedical reports
ISSN: 2049-9434
Titre abrégé: Biomed Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613227

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 12 12 2018
accepted: 05 04 2019
entrez: 16 5 2019
pubmed: 16 5 2019
medline: 16 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of the present study was to evaluate symptomatic reflux esophagitis (RE) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users. The present study conducted a hospital-based, retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive RE cases in PPI users at Juntendo University Hospital recruited between 2008 and 2016. Eligible patients were PPI users with a complete patient profile, who completed the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (FSSG) questionnaire, and who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the examination of RE, hiatal hernia (HH) and endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy (EGA). The patients with RE who were administered PPIs were divided into two groups: Those with symptomatic RE (FSSG≥8) and those with non-symptomatic RE (FSSG<8). The present study investigated the risk factors for symptomatic RE among the patients with RE patients who were administered PPIs. Of the 13,052 cases who underwent patient profiling, the FSSG questionnaire and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, a total of 2,444 PPI users were eligible. Of the PPI users, 206 cases (8.4%) had RE. Among the 206 patients with RE, 115 (55.8%) had symptomatic RE. The profile of the symptomatic and non-symptomatic RE groups were as follows: A total of 45 females (39.1%) vs. 32 females (35.2%; non-significant); mean ± standard deviation age, 54.8±13.5 vs. 62.9±11.1 years (P<0.01); mean body mass index, 23.5±3.3 vs. 23.2±3.8 (non-significant); severe RE, 12 (10.4%) vs. 2 (2.2%; P<0.05); HH, 70 (60.9%) vs. 40 (44.0%; P<0.05); and mean score of EGA, 1.2±1.8 vs. 1.8±2.1 (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that a younger age [odds ratio (OR)=0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92-0.97, P<0.01] and HH(+) (OR=2.37; 95% CI: 1.30-4.34, P<0.01) were associated with symptomatic RE among patients with RE who were administered PPIs. In conclusion, a younger age and HH were associated with symptomatic RE in patients with RE who were administered PPIs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31086661
doi: 10.3892/br.2019.1206
pii: BR-0-0-1206
pmc: PMC6489533
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

277-282

Références

J Gastroenterol. 1999 Aug;34(4):435-40
pubmed: 10452673
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):463-4
pubmed: 10562747
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Mar;15(3):277-83
pubmed: 10764028
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jun;96(6):1711-7
pubmed: 11419819
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jul 1;20(1):81-8
pubmed: 15225174
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Dec;20 Suppl 9:14-25
pubmed: 15527461
J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;39(9):888-91
pubmed: 15565409
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jul 15;22(2):79-94
pubmed: 16011666
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Mar 15;23(6):751-7
pubmed: 16556177
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Oct;54(10):1537-42
pubmed: 17038071
J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(6):518-34
pubmed: 19365600
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;26(6):1034-8
pubmed: 21299618
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;27 Suppl 3:53-7
pubmed: 22486872
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;25(3):248-52
pubmed: 25141311
Helicobacter. 2015 Jun;20(3):192-8
pubmed: 25581708
J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug;51(8):751-67
pubmed: 27325300
Age Ageing. 2016 Nov;45(6):753-756
pubmed: 27506440
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Oct 04;12:1507-1515
pubmed: 27785038
Biomed Rep. 2017 Feb;6(2):175-180
pubmed: 28357069
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995;9 Suppl 1:15-25
pubmed: 7495937
Gastroenterology. 1996 Jul;111(1):85-92
pubmed: 8698230
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Sep;91(9):1749-57
pubmed: 8792693
Gastroenterology. 1997 Jun;112(6):1798-810
pubmed: 9178669
Gut. 1997 Oct;41(4):452-8
pubmed: 9391241

Auteurs

Daisuke Asaoka (D)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Tsutomu Takeda (T)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Hitoshi Sasaki (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo 136-0075, Japan.

Yuji Shimada (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka 410-2211, Japan.

Kenshi Matsumoto (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Hiroya Ueyama (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Kohei Matsumoto (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Kentaro Izumi (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Hiroyuki Komori (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Yoichi Akazawa (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Taro Osada (T)

Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba 279-0021, Japan.

Mariko Hojo (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Akihito Nagahara (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Classifications MeSH