Development of a clinical practice guideline for orthodontically induced external apical root resorption.


Journal

European journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 1460-2210
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909010

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 16 5 2019
medline: 30 9 2020
entrez: 16 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To develop a clinical practice guideline on orthodontically induced external apical root resorption (EARR), with evidence-based and, when needed, consensus-based recommendations concerning diagnosis, risk factors, management during treatment, and after-treatment care. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument and the Dutch Method for Evidence-Based Guideline Development were used to develop the guideline. Based on a survey of all Dutch orthodontists, we formulated four clinical questions regarding EARR. To address these questions, we conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE and Embase, and we performed a systematic literature review. The quality of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. After discussing the evidence, a Task Force formulated considerations and recommendations. The drafted guideline was sent for comments to all relevant stakeholders. Eight studies were included. The quality of evidence (GRADE) was rated as low or very low. Only the patient-related risk factors, 'gender' and 'age', showed a moderate quality of evidence. The Task Force formulated 13 final recommendations concerning the detection of EARR, risk factors, EARR management during treatment, and after-treatment care when EARR has occurred. Stakeholder consultation resulted in 51 comments on the drafted guideline. After processing the comments, the final guideline was authorized by the Dutch Association of Orthodontists. The entire process took 3 years. The quality of the available evidence was mainly low, and patient-reported outcome measures were lacking. This clinical practice guideline allows clinicians to respond to EARR based on current knowledge, although the recommendations are weak due to low-quality evidence. It may reduce variation between practices and aid in providing patients appropriate information.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31087032
pii: 5489277
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz034
pmc: PMC7109605
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

115-124

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society.

Références

Eur J Orthod. 1992 Apr;14(2):125-39
pubmed: 1582457
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jan 17;166(2):128-132
pubmed: 27893062
Am J Orthod. 1986 Jan;89(1):51-5
pubmed: 3455795
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Feb;107(2):172-6
pubmed: 7847276
CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42
pubmed: 20603348
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):482-7
pubmed: 17974537
Angle Orthod. 2001 Jun;71(3):185-9
pubmed: 11407770
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2004 May;7(2):71-8
pubmed: 15180086
Prog Orthod. 2014 Jul 23;15:48
pubmed: 25139200
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Nov 30;39(6):654-659
pubmed: 28383705
Genet Mol Res. 2013 Oct 18;12(4):4678-86
pubmed: 24222244
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(6):403-8; discussion 409-10
pubmed: 8702065
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):48-55
pubmed: 7598104
Eur J Orthod. 2000 Feb;22(1):85-92
pubmed: 10721249
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 May;147(5):610-26
pubmed: 25919107
Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):480-7
pubmed: 21919826
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Oct;36(5):522-30
pubmed: 23197574
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):18
pubmed: 28670661
Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332
pubmed: 18082557
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Dec;35(6):796-802
pubmed: 23321851
Eur J Orthod. 1988 Feb;10(1):30-8
pubmed: 3162877
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):448-55
pubmed: 19361730
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jan;99(1):35-43
pubmed: 1986524
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2017 Sep;11(9-10):
pubmed: 28371361
Eur J Orthod. 1994 Jun;16(3):223-8
pubmed: 8062862
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):462-76; discussion 12A
pubmed: 20362905
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):316-23
pubmed: 17826599
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Jul;96(1):43-6
pubmed: 2750719
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Dec;28(6):561-6
pubmed: 17041083
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;(11):CD008003
pubmed: 26599212

Auteurs

Caroline F W Sondeijker (CFW)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.

Antoon A Lamberts (AA)

Knowledge Institute of the Federation of Medical Specialists, Utrecht.

Stefan H Beckmann (SH)

Private practice, 's-Gravenhage, The Netherlands.

Reinder B Kuitert (RB)

Department of Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Koen van Westing (K)

Department of Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Saskia Persoon (S)

Knowledge Institute of the Federation of Medical Specialists, Utrecht.

Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman (AM)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH