Machine learning approach for distinguishing malignant and benign lung nodules utilizing standardized perinodular parenchymal features from CT.
artificial intelligence
computed tomography
pulmonary nodule
radiomics
risk assessment
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
03
10
2018
revised:
25
04
2019
accepted:
07
05
2019
pubmed:
16
5
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
16
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Computed tomography (CT) is an effective method for detecting and characterizing lung nodules in vivo. With the growing use of chest CT, the detection frequency of lung nodules is increasing. Noninvasive methods to distinguish malignant from benign nodules have the potential to decrease the clinical burden, risk, and cost involved in follow-up procedures on the large number of false-positive lesions detected. This study examined the benefit of including perinodular parenchymal features in machine learning (ML) tools for pulmonary nodule assessment. Lung nodule cases with pathology confirmed diagnosis (74 malignant, 289 benign) were used to extract quantitative imaging characteristics from computed tomography scans of the nodule and perinodular parenchyma tissue. A ML tool development pipeline was employed using k-medoids clustering and information theory to determine efficient predictor sets for different amounts of parenchyma inclusion and build an artificial neural network classifier. The resulting ML tool was validated using an independent cohort (50 malignant, 50 benign). The inclusion of parenchymal imaging features improved the performance of the ML tool over exclusively nodular features (P < 0.01). The best performing ML tool included features derived from nodule diameter-based surrounding parenchyma tissue quartile bands. We demonstrate similar high-performance values on the independent validation cohort (AUC-ROC = 0.965). A comparison using the independent validation cohort with the Fleischner pulmonary nodule follow-up guidelines demonstrated a theoretical reduction in recommended follow-up imaging and procedures. Radiomic features extracted from the parenchyma surrounding lung nodules contain valid signals with spatial relevance for the task of lung cancer risk classification. Through standardization of feature extraction regions from the parenchyma, ML tool validation performance of 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity was achieved.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31087332
doi: 10.1002/mp.13592
pmc: PMC6945763
mid: NIHMS1051487
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3207-3216Subventions
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES005605
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL089897
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA086862
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL089856
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA141769
Pays : United States
Organisme : COPDGene study
ID : NCT00608764
Organisme : National Cancer Institute, Health and Human Services
ID : HHSN26120130011I
Organisme : INHALE
ID : R01CA141769
Organisme : INHALE
ID : P30CA022453
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA022453
Pays : United States
Organisme : Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center
ID : NCI P30 CA086862
Organisme : Herrick Foundation
Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409
pubmed: 21714641
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Feb;23(1):51-65
pubmed: 19242759
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Oct;2(4):041004
pubmed: 26870744
J Digit Imaging. 2016 Feb;29(1):86-103
pubmed: 26055544
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 18;8(1):9286
pubmed: 29915334
Phys Biol. 2014 Nov 26;11(6):060201
pubmed: 25426742
Acad Radiol. 2016 Feb;23(2):186-91
pubmed: 26616209
Med Phys. 2017 Sep;44(9):4747-4757
pubmed: 28657201
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Oct;12(10):1799-1808
pubmed: 28501942
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243
pubmed: 28240562
PLoS One. 2013 May 15;8(5):e63559
pubmed: 23691066
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct 1;194(7):794-806
pubmed: 27482984
COPD. 2010 Feb;7(1):32-43
pubmed: 20214461
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0185032
pubmed: 29121063
Med Phys. 2009 Jul;36(7):3086-98
pubmed: 19673208
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Dec;11(12):2120-2128
pubmed: 27422797
Med Phys. 2006 Jul;33(7):2323-37
pubmed: 16898434
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Oct 1;89:530-539
pubmed: 28473055
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34
pubmed: 30620402
AAPM Rep. 2014 Sep;2014:6-23
pubmed: 27546949
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Oct;3(4):044506
pubmed: 28018939
Psychometrika. 1947 Jun;12(2):153-7
pubmed: 20254758
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Sep;25(9):1341-7
pubmed: 27383774
Artif Intell Med. 2010 Sep;50(1):43-53
pubmed: 20570118
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):269-74
pubmed: 24322569
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 15;6:24454
pubmed: 27079888
Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):286-295
pubmed: 28872442
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Aug;31(4):451-463
pubmed: 29047033