Using a theory-driven creative process to design a peri-urban on-site sanitation quality improvement intervention.
Applied behavioral science
Behavior Centered Design
Behavior change intervention
Demand
Peri-urban
Sanitation
Theory
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 May 2019
14 May 2019
Historique:
received:
30
05
2018
accepted:
25
04
2019
entrez:
16
5
2019
pubmed:
16
5
2019
medline:
31
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Behavior change interventions have been developed by drawing from many different theories using design processes of varying specificity. We describe the development of a behavior change intervention to improve on-site peri-urban sanitation quality in Lusaka, Zambia using the Behavior Centered Design (BCD) framework to explain the results of the process applied to improving the quality of shared peri-urban sanitation and compare them to similar interventions. We used the BCD behavioral determinants model to synthesize the data from our literature review and formative research. Then, we partnered with creative professionals using a design process to develop a theory-driven on-site peri-urban sanitation intervention. Particular attention was paid to the implications of using BCD for intervention development on improving its effectiveness, increasing the contributions to knowledge for other behaviors and settings, and advancing the discipline of applied behavioral science. Based on findings from a literature review and formative research, we designed an intervention to encourage landlords to improve their toilets by making them more accessible, desirable, hygienic, and sustainable. The intervention involved landlords meeting in facilitated groups every 2 weeks with individual follow-up after each meeting. The meetings presented surprising "hidden camera"-style videos to reveal tenants' perspectives, used participatory activities to help landlords reevaluate the benefits they would derive from improving sanitation on their plots, and provided practical guidance and mechanisms to facilitate the performance of construction and cleaning behaviors. Using the BCD framework provided an easy-to-follow intervention design process. The resulting intervention is highly creative and multi-faceted, with each element having a theoretical role in an explicit theory of change. The development of this theory-driven intervention advances applied behavioral science by facilitating evaluation of each of the behavior change techniques and the overall delivery mechanism hypothesized to change the target behaviors. This informs the adaptation of these findings to improving on-site sanitation in other settings and the iterative development of the BCD model, which can be used to more effectively change other behaviors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Behavior change interventions have been developed by drawing from many different theories using design processes of varying specificity. We describe the development of a behavior change intervention to improve on-site peri-urban sanitation quality in Lusaka, Zambia using the Behavior Centered Design (BCD) framework to explain the results of the process applied to improving the quality of shared peri-urban sanitation and compare them to similar interventions.
METHODS
METHODS
We used the BCD behavioral determinants model to synthesize the data from our literature review and formative research. Then, we partnered with creative professionals using a design process to develop a theory-driven on-site peri-urban sanitation intervention. Particular attention was paid to the implications of using BCD for intervention development on improving its effectiveness, increasing the contributions to knowledge for other behaviors and settings, and advancing the discipline of applied behavioral science.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Based on findings from a literature review and formative research, we designed an intervention to encourage landlords to improve their toilets by making them more accessible, desirable, hygienic, and sustainable. The intervention involved landlords meeting in facilitated groups every 2 weeks with individual follow-up after each meeting. The meetings presented surprising "hidden camera"-style videos to reveal tenants' perspectives, used participatory activities to help landlords reevaluate the benefits they would derive from improving sanitation on their plots, and provided practical guidance and mechanisms to facilitate the performance of construction and cleaning behaviors.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Using the BCD framework provided an easy-to-follow intervention design process. The resulting intervention is highly creative and multi-faceted, with each element having a theoretical role in an explicit theory of change. The development of this theory-driven intervention advances applied behavioral science by facilitating evaluation of each of the behavior change techniques and the overall delivery mechanism hypothesized to change the target behaviors. This informs the adaptation of these findings to improving on-site sanitation in other settings and the iterative development of the BCD model, which can be used to more effectively change other behaviors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31088432
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6898-7
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-6898-7
pmc: PMC6518808
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
565Subventions
Organisme : Sanitation and Hygiene Applied Research for Equity (SHARE)
ID : ITDCHA2310
Références
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Aug;22(8):1000-1011
pubmed: 28556458
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 26;13:1015
pubmed: 24160869
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:72-9
pubmed: 26547047
Health Educ Res. 2005 Jun;20(3):275-90
pubmed: 15632099
BMJ. 2011 Jan 25;342:d228
pubmed: 21266441
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct;4(10):1561-6
pubmed: 17958462
Curr Biol. 2014 Apr 14;24(8):R321-4
pubmed: 24735856
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):323-44
pubmed: 25104107
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e659-60
pubmed: 26475003
J Health Psychol. 2000 Mar;5(2):151-4
pubmed: 22049003
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e701-11
pubmed: 26475017
Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351-77
pubmed: 3068205
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;10(4):425-446
pubmed: 27535821
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(8):1325-32
pubmed: 21439700
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;194:128-134
pubmed: 29100137
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 21;4:123
pubmed: 27446891
Health Educ Behav. 2007 Oct;34(5):777-92
pubmed: 17200094
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Mar;21(3):348-64
pubmed: 26701153
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Nov;61(9):1958-70
pubmed: 15927329
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Feb 27;12(3):2588-611
pubmed: 25734790
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(11):2446-59
pubmed: 15949883
Int J Environ Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(3):312-325
pubmed: 30403877
Int J Environ Health Res. 2012;22(5):431-49
pubmed: 22292899
Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):930-7
pubmed: 24625175
Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):903-6
pubmed: 25883316
Int J Environ Health Res. 2015;25(1):81-95
pubmed: 24624936
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 28;8:39
pubmed: 23537192
AIDS Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):273-8
pubmed: 10928203
Int J Environ Health Res. 2013;23(3):191-204
pubmed: 22873693
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:139-147
pubmed: 31085398