High sensitivity and specificity of 4D-CTA in the detection of cranial arteriovenous shunts.
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
/ methods
Arteriovenous Anastomosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations
/ diagnostic imaging
Computed Tomography Angiography
/ methods
Female
Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
/ standards
Humans
Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Angiography
Arteriovenous malformations
Brain imaging
Dural arteriovenous fistula
Four-dimensional computed tomography
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
29
06
2018
accepted:
10
04
2019
revised:
31
03
2019
pubmed:
16
5
2019
medline:
14
1
2020
entrez:
16
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In a prospective cohort study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved CT angiography (4D-CTA) compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for detecting cranial arteriovenous shunts. Patients were enrolled if a DSA had been ordered querying either a dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) or a cerebral arteriovenous malformation (bAVM). After enrolment, both a DSA and a 4D-CTA were performed. Both studies were evaluated using a standardized form. If a dAVF or bAVM was found, its classification, angioarchitectural details, and treatment options were recorded. Ninety-eight patients were enrolled and 76 full datasets were acquired. DSA demonstrated a shunting lesion in 28 out of 76 cases (prevalence 37%). 4D-CTA demonstrated all but two of these lesions (sensitivity of 93%) and produced one false positive (specificity of 98%). These numbers yielded a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%. Significant doubt regarding the 4D-CTA diagnosis was reported in 6.6% of all cases and both false-negative 4D-CTA results were characterized by such doubt. 4D-CTA has very high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of intracranial arteriovenous shunts. Based on these results, 4D-CTA may replace DSA imaging as a first modality in the diagnostic workup in a large number of patients suspected of a cranial dAVF or bAVM, especially if there is no doubt regarding the 4D-CTA diagnosis. • 4D-CTA was shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy and is an appropriate, less invasive replacement for DSA as a diagnostic tool for cranial arteriovenous shunts in the majority of suspected cases. • Doubt regarding the 4D-CTA result should prompt additional DSA imaging, as it is associated with false negatives. • False-positive 4D-CTA results are rare, but do exist.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31089848
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06234-4
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06234-4
pmc: PMC6795637
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5961-5970Références
Neuroradiology. 2012 Feb;54(2):123-31
pubmed: 21465177
Neuroradiology. 2004 Dec;46 Suppl 2:s214-22
pubmed: 15645155
Lancet. 1999 Nov 6;354(9190):1594-7
pubmed: 10560674
Radiographics. 2010 Mar;30(2):483-501
pubmed: 20228330
Eur Radiol. 2010 Nov;20(11):2723-31
pubmed: 20535613
J Neurosurg. 1995 Feb;82(2):166-79
pubmed: 7815143
Neuroradiol J. 2018 Jun;31(3):230-234
pubmed: 28691576
J Neuroradiol. 2014 May;41(2):117-23
pubmed: 23774002
Stroke. 2002 May;33(5):1233-6
pubmed: 11988596
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):767-70
pubmed: 19875470
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jan;32(1):49-53
pubmed: 20966056
Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):522-8
pubmed: 12637677
Acad Radiol. 2009 Feb;16(2):123-9
pubmed: 19124096
Klin Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug;19(3):187-96
pubmed: 19705072
J Neurosurg. 1986 May;64(5):724-30
pubmed: 3701421
Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):812-9
pubmed: 17517935
Br J Radiol. 2009 Jul;82(979):561-70
pubmed: 19221186
Stroke. 1999 Feb;30(2):317-20
pubmed: 9933266
Neuroradiol J. 2015 Aug;28(4):376-84
pubmed: 26427892
Interv Neuroradiol. 2012 Dec;18(4):377-9
pubmed: 23217631
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:611-619
pubmed: 28366753