Associations of sedentary time and self-reported television time during pregnancy with incident gestational diabetes and plasma glucose levels in women at risk of gestational diabetes in the UK.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2019
Historique:
received: 28 01 2019
accepted: 30 04 2019
entrez: 17 5 2019
pubmed: 17 5 2019
medline: 20 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Sedentary time is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, but the association between objectively measured sedentary time and incident gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has not been tested. The purpose of this paper is to test associations between objectively measured sedentary time and self-reported television time during pregnancy with incident GDM and plasma glucose levels among women at high risk for GDM. At 20 weeks' gestation, pregnant women (n = 188) in the North East of England with a risk factor for GDM wore an activPAL accelerometer and reported their usual television time. Participants underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks' gestation. Regression analyses were used to test for associations of total and prolonged sedentary time, breaks in sedentary time, and television time with GDM and fasting and 2-h glucose levels. Interaction terms were applied to examine whether the association between each indicator of sedentary time and glucose levels differed by GDM status. Total sedentary time (hours/day) was not associated with incident GDM (OR 1.00 (95%CI 1.00, 1.01)). The association between total sedentary time and glucose levels depended on GDM status: sedentary time was associated with fasting (β = 0.16 (95%CI 0.01, 0.31)) and 2-h (β = 0.15 (95%CI 0.01, 0.30)) glucose levels for those without GDM, while breaks in sedentary time were associated with lower fasting (β = - 0.55 (95%CI - 0.92, - 0.17)) and 2-h (β = - 0.40 (95%CI - 0.77, - 0.03)) glucose levels for those with GDM. Prolonged sedentary time was associated with higher fasting glucose levels regardless of GDM status (β 0.15 (0.01, 0.30)). Television time was associated with development of GDM (OR 3.03 (95%CI 1.21, 7.96)) but not with plasma glucose levels. This is the first study to test associations between posture-based measures of sedentary time during pregnancy and GDM and glucose levels. The findings presented here suggest the possible importance of minimizing or breaking up sedentary time for the management of glucose levels during pregnancy, at least among women at high risk of GDM. Further research is needed to understand the different roles of total sedentary time and television time in the development of GDM.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Sedentary time is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, but the association between objectively measured sedentary time and incident gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has not been tested. The purpose of this paper is to test associations between objectively measured sedentary time and self-reported television time during pregnancy with incident GDM and plasma glucose levels among women at high risk for GDM.
METHODS METHODS
At 20 weeks' gestation, pregnant women (n = 188) in the North East of England with a risk factor for GDM wore an activPAL accelerometer and reported their usual television time. Participants underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks' gestation. Regression analyses were used to test for associations of total and prolonged sedentary time, breaks in sedentary time, and television time with GDM and fasting and 2-h glucose levels. Interaction terms were applied to examine whether the association between each indicator of sedentary time and glucose levels differed by GDM status.
RESULTS RESULTS
Total sedentary time (hours/day) was not associated with incident GDM (OR 1.00 (95%CI 1.00, 1.01)). The association between total sedentary time and glucose levels depended on GDM status: sedentary time was associated with fasting (β = 0.16 (95%CI 0.01, 0.31)) and 2-h (β = 0.15 (95%CI 0.01, 0.30)) glucose levels for those without GDM, while breaks in sedentary time were associated with lower fasting (β = - 0.55 (95%CI - 0.92, - 0.17)) and 2-h (β = - 0.40 (95%CI - 0.77, - 0.03)) glucose levels for those with GDM. Prolonged sedentary time was associated with higher fasting glucose levels regardless of GDM status (β 0.15 (0.01, 0.30)). Television time was associated with development of GDM (OR 3.03 (95%CI 1.21, 7.96)) but not with plasma glucose levels.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study to test associations between posture-based measures of sedentary time during pregnancy and GDM and glucose levels. The findings presented here suggest the possible importance of minimizing or breaking up sedentary time for the management of glucose levels during pregnancy, at least among women at high risk of GDM. Further research is needed to understand the different roles of total sedentary time and television time in the development of GDM.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31092217
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6928-5
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-6928-5
pmc: PMC6521349
doi:

Substances chimiques

Blood Glucose 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

575

Subventions

Organisme : Durham University
ID : Durham Doctoral Studentship
Organisme : Biosocial Society
ID : Postgraduate Fieldwork Bursary
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : Clinical Research Network Portfolio

Références

Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A38
pubmed: 16539779
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;108(5):1200-7
pubmed: 17077243
Cell Metab. 2007 Apr;5(4):237-52
pubmed: 17403369
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1384-9
pubmed: 17473059
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6
pubmed: 18252901
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Sep;63(9):734-40
pubmed: 19401278
Eur Heart J. 2011 Mar;32(5):590-7
pubmed: 21224291
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1561-7
pubmed: 21233777
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Jun 16;11:44
pubmed: 21679399
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jul;8(5):693-8
pubmed: 21734315
Diabetes Care. 2012 May;35(5):976-83
pubmed: 22374636
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34916
pubmed: 22514690
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Jun;37(3):540-2
pubmed: 22540258
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Nov;44(11):2243-52
pubmed: 22648343
Diabetologia. 2013 May;56(5):1012-20
pubmed: 23456209
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Nov;22(11):953-8
pubmed: 23968237
Prev Med. 2014 Aug;65:23-7
pubmed: 24732719
Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;64(3-4):239-46
pubmed: 25300266
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 05;4(11):e006034
pubmed: 25377012
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32
pubmed: 25599350
Gait Posture. 2015 May;41(4):917-22
pubmed: 25852024
Diabetes Care. 2015 Oct;38(10):1835-43
pubmed: 26156528
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0136161
pubmed: 26296095
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39(1):130-8
pubmed: 26628415
Diabetologia. 2016 Apr;59(4):709-18
pubmed: 26831300
Eur J Endocrinol. 2016 Jun;174(6):763-73
pubmed: 26966174
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Mar 24;13:41
pubmed: 27009327
Cytokine. 2016 Dec;88:91-98
pubmed: 27591509
Physiol Meas. 2016 Sep 21;37(10):1653-1668
pubmed: 27652827
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Feb 23;6:97-103
pubmed: 28271028
Front Physiol. 2017 Apr 28;8:262
pubmed: 28503154
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Nov;49(11):2216-2222
pubmed: 28594657
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 01;187(2):181-189
pubmed: 28595346
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0180119
pubmed: 28662164
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 18;17(1):364
pubmed: 29047402
Obes Rev. 2018 Mar;19(3):381-395
pubmed: 29178252
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jun;20(6):1526-1530
pubmed: 29431272
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;33(9):811-829
pubmed: 29589226
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):387-395
pubmed: 29726906
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(6):377-382
pubmed: 29891615
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Sep 05;12:94-100
pubmed: 30214853
J Sport Health Sci. 2017 Jun;6(2):162-178
pubmed: 30356601

Auteurs

Janelle M Wagnild (JM)

Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. j.m.wagnild@dur.ac.uk.

Kim Hinshaw (K)

Department of Obstetrics, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.

Tessa M Pollard (TM)

Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH