Kanuka honey versus aciclovir for the topical treatment of herpes simplex labialis: a randomised controlled trial.

To compare New Zealand medical grade kanuka honey with topical aciclovir for the treatment of herpes simplex labialis. Prospective parallel randomised controlled open-label superiority trial. 76 community pharmacies across New Zealand between 10 September 2015 and 13 December 2017. 952 adults randomised within the first 72 hours of a herpes simplex labialis episode. Random assignment 1:1 to either 5% aciclovir cream or medical grade kanuka honey (90%)/glycerine (10%) cream, both applied five times daily. The primary outcome was time from randomisation to return to normal skin (stage 7). Secondary outcomes included time from randomisation to stage 4 (open wound), time from stage 4 to 7, maximal pain, time to pain resolution and treatment acceptability. Primary outcome variable: Kaplan-Meier-based estimates (95% CI) for the median time in days for return to normal skin were 8 (8 to 9) days for aciclovir and 9 (8 to 9) for honey; HR (95% CI) 1.06 (0.92 to 1.22), p=0.56. There were no statistically significant differences between treatments for all secondary outcome variables. No related serious adverse events were reported. There was no evidence of a difference in efficacy between topical medical grade kanuka honey and 5% aciclovir in the pharmacy-based treatment of herpes simplex labialis. ACTRN12615000648527;Post-results.

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: RB reports grants from HoneyLab, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.