Informing the development of a standardised approach to measure antibiotic use in secondary care: a systematic review protocol.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antimicrobial Stewardship
/ statistics & numerical data
Bacterial Infections
/ drug therapy
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Humans
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ statistics & numerical data
Reference Standards
Research Design
Secondary Care
Systematic Reviews as Topic
antibiotic resistance
antibiotic use
high resource
secondary care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 05 2019
14 05 2019
Historique:
entrez:
17
5
2019
pubmed:
17
5
2019
medline:
23
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ecological and individual-level evidence indicates that there is an association between level of antibiotic exposure and the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance. The Global Point Prevalence Survey in 2015 estimated that 34.4% of hospital inpatients globally received at least one antimicrobial. Antimicrobial stewardship to optimise antibiotic use in secondary care can reduce the high risk of patients acquiring and transmitting drug-resistant infections in this setting. However, differences in the availability of data on antibiotic use in this context make it difficult to develop a consensus of how to comparably monitor antibiotic prescribing patterns across secondary care. This review will aim to document and critically evaluate methods and measures to monitor antibiotic use in secondary care. We will search Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and websites of key organisations for published reports where an attempt to measure antibiotic usage among adult inpatients in high-income hospital settings has been made. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies for eligibility, extract data and assess the study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A description of the methods and measures used in antibiotic consumption surveillance will be presented. An adaptation of the Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects Equity framework will be used to consider the practicality of implementing different approaches to measuring antibiotic usage in secondary care settings. A descriptive comparison of definitions and estimates of (in)appropriate antibiotic usage will also be carried out. Ethical approval is not required for this study as no primary data will be collected. The results will be published in relevant peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences or meetings where possible. This review will inform future approaches to scale up antibiotic consumption surveillance strategies to attempt to maximise impact through standardisation. CRD42018103375.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31092658
pii: bmjopen-2018-026792
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026792
pmc: PMC6530450
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e026792Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : CS-2016-16-007
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 16;16(1):661
pubmed: 27852287
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 10;11(1):134
pubmed: 27724957
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jun 1;73(suppl_6):vi30-vi39
pubmed: 29878221
Lancet. 2005 Feb 12-18;365(9459):579-87
pubmed: 15708101
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 24;10:132
pubmed: 26404642
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jul 29;10(7):e0004823
pubmed: 27472421
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jun 1;73(suppl_6):vi17-vi29
pubmed: 29878219
BMJ. 2010 May 18;340:c2096
pubmed: 20483949
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jun;6(6):e619-e629
pubmed: 29681513
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jun 1;73(suppl_6):vi50-vi58
pubmed: 29878222
S Afr Med J. 2015 Apr 06;105(5):325
pubmed: 26242647