Inadequate Prenatal Visit and Home Delivery as Determinants of Perinatal Outcomes: Does Parity Matter?


Journal

Journal of pregnancy
ISSN: 2090-2735
Titre abrégé: J Pregnancy
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101553823

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 22 01 2019
accepted: 31 03 2019
entrez: 17 5 2019
pubmed: 17 5 2019
medline: 29 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Adverse perinatal outcomes are still high in developing countries. Contradicting evidences were reported about the effect of parity on adverse perinatal outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare perinatal outcomes in grand multiparous and low multiparity women in Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and Adare General Hospital of Ethiopia. Comparative cross-sectional study design was employed to include 461 mothers from February to June 2018. Data were collected by structured questionnaire using interview and from patient charts. Data were entered using EPI-DATA version 4.4.2.0. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were computed using STATA version 14 computer software. Of all study participants, 24.9% (95% Confidence interval: 21.1%-29.1%) had at least one adverse perinatal outcome. Stillbirth (38.9), low Apgar score (51.9%), and congenital malformation (3.70%) were frequently occurred complications in grand multiparas compared to low multiparous women. Nevertheless, meconium aspiration, need for resuscitation, and macrosomia were higher in low multiparous women (9.84%, 14.75%, and 57.38%, respectively). Less than four prenatal visits (AOR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.92) and previous home delivery (AOR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.33) were independent predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes. However, parity did not show statistically significant difference in perinatal outcomes. This finding underscores the fact that frequency of antenatal care and place of delivery are significant predictors of perinatal outcomes. However, parity did not show statistically significant difference in perinatal outcomes. Women empowerment, promoting health facility delivery, and early, comprehensive antenatal care are needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Adverse perinatal outcomes are still high in developing countries. Contradicting evidences were reported about the effect of parity on adverse perinatal outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare perinatal outcomes in grand multiparous and low multiparity women in Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and Adare General Hospital of Ethiopia.
METHODS METHODS
Comparative cross-sectional study design was employed to include 461 mothers from February to June 2018. Data were collected by structured questionnaire using interview and from patient charts. Data were entered using EPI-DATA version 4.4.2.0. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were computed using STATA version 14 computer software.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of all study participants, 24.9% (95% Confidence interval: 21.1%-29.1%) had at least one adverse perinatal outcome. Stillbirth (38.9), low Apgar score (51.9%), and congenital malformation (3.70%) were frequently occurred complications in grand multiparas compared to low multiparous women. Nevertheless, meconium aspiration, need for resuscitation, and macrosomia were higher in low multiparous women (9.84%, 14.75%, and 57.38%, respectively). Less than four prenatal visits (AOR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.92) and previous home delivery (AOR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.33) were independent predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes. However, parity did not show statistically significant difference in perinatal outcomes.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This finding underscores the fact that frequency of antenatal care and place of delivery are significant predictors of perinatal outcomes. However, parity did not show statistically significant difference in perinatal outcomes. Women empowerment, promoting health facility delivery, and early, comprehensive antenatal care are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31093374
doi: 10.1155/2019/9024258
pmc: PMC6481024
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

9024258

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Jul;89(7):862-75
pubmed: 20583931
Niger J Clin Pract. 2011 Jan-Mar;14(1):6-9
pubmed: 21493983
Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:289-93
pubmed: 22870043
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jun 05;10(6):2296-335
pubmed: 23739649
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Dec 23;13:241
pubmed: 24365087
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S2
pubmed: 24564800
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 30;9(4):e96294
pubmed: 24787694
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jun;40(6):1573-7
pubmed: 24888918
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 29;9(10):e109364
pubmed: 25353960
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Dec 20;14:312
pubmed: 25528150
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Mar 29;15:76
pubmed: 25886401
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 16;15:387
pubmed: 25887409
Reprod Health. 2015;12 Suppl 2:S7
pubmed: 26063292
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 29;15:279
pubmed: 26515763
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Apr;32:39-49
pubmed: 26527304
Mater Sociomed. 2015 Aug;27(4):244-7
pubmed: 26543415
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 25;15:309
pubmed: 26608259
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Jun;29(3):304-11
pubmed: 26620384
East Afr Med J. 2013 Mar;90(3):84-8
pubmed: 26866106
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jun 02;16(1):132
pubmed: 27255155
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;134(3):309-14
pubmed: 27365291
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 15;16(1):160
pubmed: 27417308
CMAJ. 2016 Dec 6;188(17-18):E456-E465
pubmed: 27672220
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):310
pubmed: 28927391
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Apr 23;29:220
pubmed: 30100974
Reprod Health. 2018 Sep 29;15(1):163
pubmed: 30268132

Auteurs

Nigus Bililign Yimer (N)

Department of Midwifery, Woldia University, Ethiopia.

Zelalem Tenaw (Z)

Department of Midwifery, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

Kalkidan Solomon (K)

Department of Public Health, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.

Tesfahun Mulatu (T)

Department of Public Health, Woldia University, Ethiopia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH