Writing Behavior of Phospholipids in Polymer Pen Lithography (PPL) for Bioactive Micropatterns.
PPL
biomimetic membranes
phospholipids
polymer pen lithography
scanning probe lithography
supported lipid bilayers
supported lipid membranes
Journal
Polymers
ISSN: 2073-4360
Titre abrégé: Polymers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 May 2019
15 May 2019
Historique:
received:
23
04
2019
revised:
08
05
2019
accepted:
13
05
2019
entrez:
18
5
2019
pubmed:
18
5
2019
medline:
18
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lipid-based membranes play crucial roles in regulating the interface between cells and their external environment, the communication within cells, and cellular sensing. To study these important processes, various lipid-based artificial membrane models have been developed in recent years and, indeed, large-area arrays of supported lipid bilayers suit the needs of many of these studies remarkably well. Here, the direct-write scanning probe lithography technique called polymer pen lithography (PPL) was used as a tool for the creation of lipid micropatterns over large areas via polymer-stamp-mediated transfer of lipid-containing inks onto glass substrates. In order to better understand and control the lipid transfer in PPL, we conducted a systematic study of the influence of dwell time (i.e., duration of contact between tip and sample), humidity, and printing pressure on the outcome of PPL with phospholipids and discuss results in comparison to the more often studied dip-pen nanolithography with phospholipids. This is the first systematic study in phospholipid printing with PPL. Biocompatibility of the obtained substrates with up to two different ink compositions was demonstrated. The patterns are suitable to serve as a platform for mast cell activation experiments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31096642
pii: polym11050891
doi: 10.3390/polym11050891
pmc: PMC6572014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
ID : n/a
Références
Small. 2007 Jan;3(1):71-5
pubmed: 17294472
Science. 2008 Sep 19;321(5896):1658-60
pubmed: 18703709
Small. 2008 Oct;4(10):1785-93
pubmed: 18814174
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(41):7626-9
pubmed: 19731290
Small. 2010 May 21;6(10):1082-6
pubmed: 19859944
Nanotechnology. 2011 Jun 3;22(22):225301
pubmed: 21464525
Small. 2012 Feb 20;8(4):585-91
pubmed: 22278752
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Small. 2013 Oct 11;9(19):3266-75
pubmed: 23554307
Chem Sci. 2013 May 1;4(5):2093-2099
pubmed: 23641313
Sci Rep. 2013 Sep 25;3:2743
pubmed: 24067786
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2591
pubmed: 24107937
Nat Protoc. 2013 Dec;8(12):2548-60
pubmed: 24263094
Small. 2014 May 28;10(10):1991-8
pubmed: 24616258
Small. 2014 Jul 23;10(14):2870-6
pubmed: 24678019
Adv Mater Interfaces. 2014 Jul;1(4):null
pubmed: 25485228
Nanotechnology. 2015 May 1;26(17):175303
pubmed: 25854547
Nanoscale. 2015 Oct 14;7(38):15618-34
pubmed: 26267408
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Aug 21;15(8):20863-72
pubmed: 26308001
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015 Oct 26;54(44):12894-9
pubmed: 26349629
Adv Healthc Mater. 2015 Dec 30;4(18):2743-79
pubmed: 26573989
Small. 2016 Oct;12(38):5330-5338
pubmed: 27511293
Nanofabrication. 2015 Jul;2(1):34-42
pubmed: 27617264
Chem Commun (Camb). 2016 Oct 11;52(83):12310-12313
pubmed: 27711347
Langmuir. 2017 Sep 5;33(35):8739-8748
pubmed: 28650173
Science. 1999 Jan 29;283(5402):661-3
pubmed: 9924019