A Critical Analysis of TKR In Vitro Wear Tests Considering Predicted Knee Joint Loads.

in vitro wear testing knee joint forces musculoskeletal multibody model total knee replacement

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2019
Historique:
received: 25 03 2019
revised: 30 04 2019
accepted: 07 05 2019
entrez: 18 5 2019
pubmed: 18 5 2019
medline: 18 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Detailed knowledge about loading of the knee joint is essential for preclinical testing of total knee replacement. Direct measurement of joint reaction forces is generally not feasible in a clinical setting; non-invasive methods based on musculoskeletal modelling should therefore be considered as a valid alternative to the standards guidelines. The aim of this paper is to investigate the possibility of using knee joint forces calculated through musculoskeletal modelling software for developing an in vitro wear assessment protocol by using a knee wear simulator. In particular, in this work we preliminarily show a comparison of the predicted knee joint forces (in silico) during the gait with those obtained from the ISO 14243-1/3 and with those measured in vivo by other authors. Subsequently, we compare the wear results obtained from a knee wear joint simulator loaded by calculated forces in correspondence to the "normal gait" kinematics with those obtained in correspondence to the loads imposed by the ISO. The obtained results show that even if the predicted load profiles are not totally in good agreement with the loads deriving from ISO standards and from in vivo measurements, they can be useful for in vitro wear tests, since the results obtained from the simulator in terms of wear are in agreement with the literature data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31096673
pii: ma12101597
doi: 10.3390/ma12101597
pmc: PMC6566793
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(1):111-8
pubmed: 10634960
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 29;358(1437):1493-500
pubmed: 14561340
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Mar;(276):7-18
pubmed: 1537177
Artif Organs. 2008 Jan;32(1):13-8
pubmed: 18181798
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008 Apr;222(3):319-31
pubmed: 18491701
J Orthop Res. 2009 Apr;27(4):540-8
pubmed: 18932244
Artif Organs. 2008 Dec;32(12):942-8
pubmed: 19133022
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Mar;24(3):299-302
pubmed: 19185959
J Biomech. 2011 Aug 11;44(12):2185-93
pubmed: 21742331
J Orthop Res. 2012 Apr;30(4):503-13
pubmed: 22161745
Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1331-40
pubmed: 22398175
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012 Feb;226(2):82-94
pubmed: 22468460
Med Eng Phys. 2013 May;35(5):591-600
pubmed: 22922096
J Biomech. 2013 Feb 22;46(4):796-800
pubmed: 23219275
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86035
pubmed: 24465856
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Oct;38:69-77
pubmed: 25032900
Med Eng Phys. 2014 Dec;36(12):1605-10
pubmed: 25242732
J Biomech Eng. 2015 Feb 1;137(2):020904
pubmed: 25429519
Int Orthop. 2015 Jul;39(7):1433-40
pubmed: 25500956
Int J Artif Organs. 2015 Jan;38(1):39-44
pubmed: 25588764
J Biomech. 2015 Mar 18;48(5):734-41
pubmed: 25627871
Artif Organs. 2016 Feb;40(2):195-201
pubmed: 26147451
J Biomech Eng. 2016 Mar;138(3):4032379
pubmed: 26720096
Materials (Basel). 2018 Apr 09;11(4):null
pubmed: 29642512
J Biomech Eng. 1998 Feb;120(1):148-59
pubmed: 9675694

Auteurs

Saverio Affatato (S)

Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy. affatato@tecno.ior.it.

Alessandro Ruggiero (A)

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy. ruggiero@unisa.it.

Classifications MeSH