Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 05 2019
Historique:
entrez: 18 5 2019
pubmed: 18 5 2019
medline: 14 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinician compassion is a vital element of health care quality. Currently, there appears to be no validated and feasible method for health care organizations to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion on a large scale. To develop and validate a tool for measuring patient assessment of clinician compassion that can be used in conjunction with the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) survey. This prospective cohort study took place from June 1 to August 30, 2018, at a US academic health care system among a pilot cohort consisting of 3325 adult patients and a validation cohort consisting of 3483 adult patients, both of whom had an outpatient clinic visit and completed the CG-CAHPS survey. After a comprehensive literature review, 12 candidate survey items were developed. Face and construct validity were performed. Candidate items were disseminated to patients in conjunction with the CG-CAHPS survey in a series of 2 studies: (1) exploratory factor analysis in one cohort to determine the factor structure and the most parsimonious set of items; and (2) validity testing in a second cohort using confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was tested using Cronbach α. Convergent validity was tested with patient assessment of clinician communication and overall satisfaction questions from CG-CAHPS survey. Overall, 6493 patient responses were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 60 (15) years, 4239 patients (65.3%) were women, and 5079 (78.2%) were white. Exploratory factor analyses identified a 5-item compassion measure to be the most parsimonious. Confirmatory factor analyses found good fit. The compassion measure demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.94) and convergent validity (clinician communication: ρ = 0.44; overall satisfaction: ρ = 0.52) but reflected a patient experience domain (compassionate care) distinct from what is currently captured in the CG-CAHPS survey. A simple 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion was developed and validated for use in conjunction with CG-CAHPS survey.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31099870
pii: 2733433
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3976
pmc: PMC6537812
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Validation Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e193976

Références

Ann Fam Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;3(5):415-21
pubmed: 16189057
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Jun;60(3):441-9
pubmed: 1619098
Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):351-74
pubmed: 20438142
J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804
pubmed: 11032203
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl:S28-34
pubmed: 23064274
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Aug;98(8):1005-10
pubmed: 25921380
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):371-9
pubmed: 10458256
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):699-705
pubmed: 15528286
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012 Aug;15(Suppl 1):S89-94
pubmed: 23024571
Eval Health Prof. 2004 Sep;27(3):237-51
pubmed: 15312283
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e190027
pubmed: 30794297
BMJ. 2001 Oct 20;323(7318):908-11
pubmed: 11668137
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;24(3):229-39
pubmed: 21551394
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Sep 18;8:1239-53
pubmed: 25258518
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 19;15:6
pubmed: 26786417
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13
pubmed: 26653297
Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):259-66
pubmed: 15076825
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):R875-R878
pubmed: 25247366
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jan 23;15:15
pubmed: 24456299
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):63-75
pubmed: 17851016
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1772-8
pubmed: 21900669
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7
pubmed: 17938396
JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1071-8
pubmed: 16954486
Front Psychol. 2016 May 26;7:763
pubmed: 27303328
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61526
pubmed: 23620760
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1285-1289
pubmed: 27084192
Med Hypotheses. 2017 Sep;107:92-97
pubmed: 28915973
Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;41(7):494-501
pubmed: 19582635
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Oct 14;14:219
pubmed: 25315848
Br J Cancer. 2003 Mar 10;88(5):658-65
pubmed: 12618870

Auteurs

Brian W Roberts (BW)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
Center for Humanism, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.

Michael B Roberts (MB)

Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessment, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Jady Yao (J)

Department of Patient Family Centered Care, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey.

Joshua Bosire (J)

Department of Patient Family Centered Care, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey.

Anthony Mazzarelli (A)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
Center for Humanism, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.

Stephen Trzeciak (S)

Center for Humanism, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
Department of Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH