Fluid intelligence and working memory support dissociable aspects of learning by physical but not observational practice.


Journal

Cognition
ISSN: 1873-7838
Titre abrégé: Cognition
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0367541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 01 09 2018
revised: 15 04 2019
accepted: 17 04 2019
pubmed: 18 5 2019
medline: 17 9 2020
entrez: 18 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Humans have a remarkable ability to learn by watching others, whether learning to tie an elaborate knot or play the piano. However, the mechanisms that translate visual input into motor skill execution remain unclear. It has been proposed that common cognitive and neural mechanisms underpin learning motor skills by physical and observational practice. Here we provide a novel test of the common mechanism hypothesis by testing the extent to which certain individual differences predict observational as well as physical learning. Participants (N = 92 per group) either physically practiced a five-element key-press sequence or watched videos of similar sequences before physically performing trained and untrained sequences in a test phase. We also measured cognitive abilities across participants that have previously been associated with rates of learning, including working memory and fluid intelligence. Our findings show that individual differences in working memory and fluid intelligence predict improvements in dissociable aspects of motor learning following physical practice, but not observational practice. Working memory predicts general learning gains from pre- to post-test that generalise to untrained sequences, whereas fluid intelligence predicts sequence-specific gains that are tied to trained sequences. However, neither working memory nor fluid intelligence predict training gains following observational learning. Therefore, these results suggest limits to the shared mechanism hypothesis of physical and observational learning. Indeed, models of observational learning need updating to reflect the extent to which such learning is based on shared as well as distinct processes compared to physical learning. We suggest that such differences could reflect the more intentional nature of learning during physical compared to observational practice, which relies to a greater extent on higher-order cognitive resources such as working memory and fluid intelligence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31100547
pii: S0010-0277(19)30100-3
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.015
pmc: PMC6711769
mid: EMS84118
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

170-183

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U105597121
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00005/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Références

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):54-77
pubmed: 25421407
J Sports Sci. 2007 Mar;25(5):497-517
pubmed: 17365538
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9
pubmed: 1736359
Am Psychol. 2005 May-Jun;60(4):308-17
pubmed: 15943523
Cortex. 2013 Sep;49(8):2001-6
pubmed: 23541152
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863
pubmed: 24324449
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 May;21(5):1013-22
pubmed: 18702578
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Dec;15(4):723-60
pubmed: 16154763
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;101(6):3116-25
pubmed: 19357338
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 19;7:82
pubmed: 23515430
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Feb;19(2):315-26
pubmed: 18515297
Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):213-20
pubmed: 16028576
Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 15;50(3):1148-67
pubmed: 20056149
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Dec;17(12):757-765
pubmed: 27761004
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:81-9
pubmed: 26407337
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):66-71
pubmed: 15631552
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2000 Dec;6(4):259-90
pubmed: 11218338
Cortex. 2013 Mar;49(3):611-25
pubmed: 23260615
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):240-51
pubmed: 20673569
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 03;4:273
pubmed: 23761769
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1123-1128
pubmed: 28853993
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Oct;65:240-254
pubmed: 30219745
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Nov;11(6):771-799
pubmed: 27899724
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;114(1):219-32
pubmed: 25904709
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1668-83
pubmed: 21983182
Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 10;3:606
pubmed: 23335907
Neural Plast. 2018 Mar 29;2018:1237962
pubmed: 29796014
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):571-85
pubmed: 20479189
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Sep;17(5):888-96
pubmed: 1834770
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0185044
pubmed: 29023463
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Sep;18(9):559-567
pubmed: 28680161
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Mar 1;28(3):907-923
pubmed: 28077513
Elife. 2013 Jul 09;2:e00801
pubmed: 23853714
Curr Biol. 2016 Apr 4;26(7):921-7
pubmed: 26972317
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:174-189
pubmed: 28479473
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jan;18(1):42-55
pubmed: 27881854
Psychol Res. 2015 Jul;79(4):609-20
pubmed: 24951055
Neuropsychologia. 2013 May;51(6):1103-8
pubmed: 23499724
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 May;54(5):890-902
pubmed: 3379585
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66
pubmed: 22006061
Neuron. 2005 Apr 7;46(1):153-60
pubmed: 15820701
J Neurosci. 2018 Nov 21;38(47):10114-10128
pubmed: 30282731
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1:0021
pubmed: 33954258
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Dec;25(12):4799-811
pubmed: 26209850
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:434-7
pubmed: 25555326
Annu Rev Psychol. 1976;27:437-85
pubmed: 773264
Hum Mov Sci. 2004 Nov;23(5):699-746
pubmed: 15589629
Cortex. 2014 Aug;57:156-66
pubmed: 24861420
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):30-60
pubmed: 15631550
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Br J Psychol. 2005 Aug;96(Pt 3):371-88
pubmed: 16131413
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 08;6:36633
pubmed: 27824129
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109 Suppl 1:10733-40
pubmed: 22723350
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1212-7
pubmed: 11127840
Conscious Cogn. 2003 Sep;12(3):376-402
pubmed: 12941284
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(1):119-30
pubmed: 20496059
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):731-741
pubmed: 28873328
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Mar;232(3):789-802
pubmed: 24306438
Cognition. 2010 Sep;116(3):321-40
pubmed: 20573341
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Apr;11(4):264-74
pubmed: 20216547

Auteurs

Dace Apšvalka (D)

Social Brain in Action Laboratory, Wales Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Wales, UK; MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.

Emily S Cross (ES)

Social Brain in Action Laboratory, Wales Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Wales, UK; Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. Electronic address: emily.cross@glasgow.ac.uk.

Richard Ramsey (R)

Social Brain in Action Laboratory, Wales Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Wales, UK. Electronic address: r.ramsey@bangor.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH