New sequential combinations of non-invasive fibrosis tests provide an accurate diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD.


Journal

Journal of hepatology
ISSN: 1600-0641
Titre abrégé: J Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8503886

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 17 01 2019
revised: 20 04 2019
accepted: 23 04 2019
pubmed: 19 5 2019
medline: 25 11 2020
entrez: 19 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Advanced liver fibrosis is an important diagnostic target in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as it defines the subgroup of patients with impaired prognosis. The non-invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis is currently limited by the suboptimal positive predictive value and the grey zone (representing indeterminate diagnosis) of fibrosis tests. Here, we aimed to determine the best combination of non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. A total of 938 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD were randomized 2:1 into derivation and validation sets. All patients underwent liver stiffness measurement with vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and blood fibrosis tests (NAFLD fibrosis score, Fibrosis-4 [FIB4], Fibrotest, Hepascore, FibroMeter). FibroMeter For the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, VCTE was significantly more accurate than the blood tests (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.840 ± 0.013, p ≤0.005). FibroMeter was the most accurate blood test (AUROC: 0.793 ± 0.015, p ≤0.017). The combinatory test FibroMeter The sequential combination of fibrosis tests in the FIB4-FM The evaluation of liver fibrosis is mandatory in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), as advanced fibrosis identifies the subgroup of patients with impaired prognosis. FibroMeter

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
Advanced liver fibrosis is an important diagnostic target in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as it defines the subgroup of patients with impaired prognosis. The non-invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis is currently limited by the suboptimal positive predictive value and the grey zone (representing indeterminate diagnosis) of fibrosis tests. Here, we aimed to determine the best combination of non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD.
METHODS
A total of 938 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD were randomized 2:1 into derivation and validation sets. All patients underwent liver stiffness measurement with vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and blood fibrosis tests (NAFLD fibrosis score, Fibrosis-4 [FIB4], Fibrotest, Hepascore, FibroMeter). FibroMeter
RESULTS
For the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, VCTE was significantly more accurate than the blood tests (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.840 ± 0.013, p ≤0.005). FibroMeter was the most accurate blood test (AUROC: 0.793 ± 0.015, p ≤0.017). The combinatory test FibroMeter
CONCLUSION
The sequential combination of fibrosis tests in the FIB4-FM
LAY SUMMARY
The evaluation of liver fibrosis is mandatory in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), as advanced fibrosis identifies the subgroup of patients with impaired prognosis. FibroMeter

Identifiants

pubmed: 31102719
pii: S0168-8278(19)30284-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.020
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

389-396

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jérôme Boursier (J)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France; Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France. Electronic address: JeBoursier@chu-angers.fr.

Maeva Guillaume (M)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut CARDIOMET, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire IMPACT, Toulouse, France.

Vincent Leroy (V)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France; INSERM U1209, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Marie Irlès (M)

Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

Marine Roux (M)

Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Adrien Lannes (A)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France; Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Juliette Foucher (J)

Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

Floraine Zuberbuhler (F)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France; Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Cyrielle Delabaudière (C)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Justine Barthelon (J)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Sophie Michalak (S)

Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France; Département de Pathologie Tissulaire et Cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.

Jean-Baptiste Hiriart (JB)

Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

Jean-Marie Peron (JM)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut CARDIOMET, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire IMPACT, Toulouse, France.

Theophile Gerster (T)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Brigitte Le Bail (B)

Service d'Anatomopathologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

Jeremie Riou (J)

MINT UMR INSERM 1066, CNRS 6021, Angers University, France.

Gilles Hunault (G)

Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Wassil Merrouche (W)

Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

Frederic Oberti (F)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France; Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Laurence Pelade (L)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Isabelle Fouchard (I)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France; Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Christophe Bureau (C)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut CARDIOMET, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire IMPACT, Toulouse, France.

Paul Calès (P)

Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France; Laboratoire HIFIH, UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Victor de Ledinghen (V)

Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France; INSERM U1053, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH