Robotic Urologic Surgery in the Infant: a Review.
Obstructed ureteropelvic junction
Pediatric urology
Robotic urologic surgery
Journal
Current urology reports
ISSN: 1534-6285
Titre abrégé: Curr Urol Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100900943
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 May 2019
18 May 2019
Historique:
entrez:
20
5
2019
pubmed:
20
5
2019
medline:
6
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The goal of this article is to review the current role of robotic urologic surgery in the infant population across a spectrum of diseases and procedures. Robotic urological surgery has been performed in the infant population across a variety of conditions including ureteropelvic junction obstruction, vesicoureteral reflux, and duplicated and nonfunctional renal moieties. However, most of the durable evidence showing safety and success remains in the repair of the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Included in this review are also strategies to address the limitations imposed by the unique physiology and anatomy of the infant. Robotic urologic surgery remains an alternative to other surgical approaches in the properly selected infant in the hands of experienced surgeons. As additional larger studies are performed, the utility of the robotic platform in this population will be clearer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31104148
doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0902-8
pii: 10.1007/s11934-019-0902-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
35Références
Anaesthesia. 1999 Sep;54(9):831-4
pubmed: 10460552
J Endourol. 2002 Sep;16(7):465-70
pubmed: 12396438
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 1999 Jun;12(3):311-4
pubmed: 17013329
J Urol. 2006 Nov;176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40
pubmed: 17070302
J Endourol. 2007 Jul;21(7):695-7
pubmed: 17705752
J Endourol. 2010 Jan;24(1):123-8
pubmed: 19958154
J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):1163-7
pubmed: 20096869
Indian J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;53(5):560-6
pubmed: 20640106
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):602-13
pubmed: 22050504
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):539-49
pubmed: 22869825
Am Fam Physician. 2012 Nov 15;86(10):940-6
pubmed: 23157147
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 May;23(5):457-9
pubmed: 23577821
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2221-6
pubmed: 23911637
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):631-8
pubmed: 24548088
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Oct;10(5):869-74
pubmed: 24661900
Adv Urol. 2014;2014:142625
pubmed: 24949008
J Urol. 2015 May;193(5 Suppl):1791-5
pubmed: 25301094
Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;58(5):652-7
pubmed: 25535431
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Aug;11(4):170.e1-4
pubmed: 25824875
Surg Today. 2016 Feb;46(2):235-40
pubmed: 26031233
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):139.e1-5
pubmed: 26052000
J Endourol. 2015 Nov;29(11):1237-41
pubmed: 26159231
J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1041-1048
pubmed: 27542552
J Robot Surg. 2009 Oct;3(3):187
pubmed: 27638377
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Oct;12(5):281.e1-281.e7
pubmed: 27751832
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):428-429
pubmed: 27825585
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Apr;18(4):30
pubmed: 28247324
J Urol. 2018 Jan;199(1):287-293
pubmed: 28941917
Asian J Urol. 2017 Jan;4(1):55-67
pubmed: 29264208
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):540.e1-540.e6
pubmed: 29909190
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):537.e1-537.e6
pubmed: 30007500
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):570.e1-570.e10
pubmed: 30177385
J Urol. 1996 Mar;155(3):1070-3
pubmed: 8583567