Feeding and Mobility Traits Influence Grasshopper Vulnerability to Agricultural Production in the Cape Floristic Region Biodiversity Hotspot.
Fynbos
Orthoptera
generalists
grasshoppers
landscape
specialist
Journal
Neotropical entomology
ISSN: 1678-8052
Titre abrégé: Neotrop Entomol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101189728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
16
11
2018
accepted:
01
05
2019
pubmed:
20
5
2019
medline:
23
4
2020
entrez:
20
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To be able to foretell which species will be at risk of extinction from possible expansion of agriculture into natural areas, we need to determine how land use affects animal groups especially insects with different life history traits. Intuitively, we can predict that the proportion of specialist versus generalist grasshoppers and widespread versus localised species can be an indicator of change in vegetation patterns in a landscape. As a result, the study examined the relationship between the extent of range distribution and mobility of grasshoppers and land-use type in the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) biodiversity hotspot. It aimed at examining grasshopper assemblage composition in association with different land uses. We specifically related the number and type of sites occupied by grasshopper species to their mobility and distribution type to find out which characters improve species survival under highly modified habitats. Grasshopper assemblages were dominated by highly mobile generalists that tolerated transformed landscapes, and mostly geographically widespread. This contrasts with the low- to medium-mobile, range-restricted specialists, which make up close to 30% of the total collection, with a lower tolerance for anthropogenically modified landscapes in the CFR. This study also reveal that the fynbos biome is an important habitat for low-mobility and range-restricted species, and hence require conscious conservation efforts to conserve such species to prevent possible future biotic erosion and homogenisation in this hotspot. This result can be used to assess the possible extent of biotic erosion or otherwise in order to recommend better conservation efforts in the CFR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31104208
doi: 10.1007/s13744-019-00697-2
pii: 10.1007/s13744-019-00697-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
992-1000Références
Annu Rev Entomol. 2004;49:405-30
pubmed: 14651470
Environ Entomol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1441-6
pubmed: 22546438
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1:S39-50
pubmed: 25576279
Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95
pubmed: 11919621
Evol Appl. 2015 Apr;8(4):363-72
pubmed: 25926881
Hereditas. 2016 Jan 15;153:1
pubmed: 28096763
Risk Anal. 2004 Aug;24(4):869-78
pubmed: 15357806
Ecol Appl. 2014 Mar;24(2):327-39
pubmed: 24689144
Nature. 2016 Dec 8;540(7632):266-269
pubmed: 27919075
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
pubmed: 17164193
Ecology. 2008 Mar;89(3):782-94
pubmed: 18459341