Feeding and Mobility Traits Influence Grasshopper Vulnerability to Agricultural Production in the Cape Floristic Region Biodiversity Hotspot.


Journal

Neotropical entomology
ISSN: 1678-8052
Titre abrégé: Neotrop Entomol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101189728

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 16 11 2018
accepted: 01 05 2019
pubmed: 20 5 2019
medline: 23 4 2020
entrez: 20 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To be able to foretell which species will be at risk of extinction from possible expansion of agriculture into natural areas, we need to determine how land use affects animal groups especially insects with different life history traits. Intuitively, we can predict that the proportion of specialist versus generalist grasshoppers and widespread versus localised species can be an indicator of change in vegetation patterns in a landscape. As a result, the study examined the relationship between the extent of range distribution and mobility of grasshoppers and land-use type in the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) biodiversity hotspot. It aimed at examining grasshopper assemblage composition in association with different land uses. We specifically related the number and type of sites occupied by grasshopper species to their mobility and distribution type to find out which characters improve species survival under highly modified habitats. Grasshopper assemblages were dominated by highly mobile generalists that tolerated transformed landscapes, and mostly geographically widespread. This contrasts with the low- to medium-mobile, range-restricted specialists, which make up close to 30% of the total collection, with a lower tolerance for anthropogenically modified landscapes in the CFR. This study also reveal that the fynbos biome is an important habitat for low-mobility and range-restricted species, and hence require conscious conservation efforts to conserve such species to prevent possible future biotic erosion and homogenisation in this hotspot. This result can be used to assess the possible extent of biotic erosion or otherwise in order to recommend better conservation efforts in the CFR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31104208
doi: 10.1007/s13744-019-00697-2
pii: 10.1007/s13744-019-00697-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

992-1000

Références

Annu Rev Entomol. 2004;49:405-30
pubmed: 14651470
Environ Entomol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1441-6
pubmed: 22546438
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1:S39-50
pubmed: 25576279
Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95
pubmed: 11919621
Evol Appl. 2015 Apr;8(4):363-72
pubmed: 25926881
Hereditas. 2016 Jan 15;153:1
pubmed: 28096763
Risk Anal. 2004 Aug;24(4):869-78
pubmed: 15357806
Ecol Appl. 2014 Mar;24(2):327-39
pubmed: 24689144
Nature. 2016 Dec 8;540(7632):266-269
pubmed: 27919075
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
pubmed: 17164193
Ecology. 2008 Mar;89(3):782-94
pubmed: 18459341

Auteurs

S Adu-Acheampong (S)

Dept of Agronomy, Univ for Development Studies, Nyankpala, Tamale, Ghana. saduacheampong@uds.edu.gh.
Dept of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch Univ, Stellenbosch, South Africa. saduacheampong@uds.edu.gh.

M J Samways (MJ)

Dept of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch Univ, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Articles similaires

Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH