Systematic evaluation of computed tomography angiography collateral scores for estimation of long-term outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke.
Collateral scores
computed tomography angiography
computed tomography perfusion
ischaemic stroke
thrombectomy
Journal
The neuroradiology journal
ISSN: 2385-1996
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiol J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101295103
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
21
5
2019
medline:
7
1
2020
entrez:
21
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study compares computed tomography angiography-based collateral scoring systems in regard to their inter-rater reliability and potential to predict functional outcome after endovascular thrombectomy, and relates them to parenchymal perfusion as measured by computed tomography perfusion. Eighty-four patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke were enrolled. Modified Tan Score, Miteff Score, Maas Score and Opercular Index Score ratio were assessed in pre-interventional computed tomography angiographies independently by two readers. Collateral scores were tested for inter-rater reliability by weighted-kappa, for correlations with three-months modified Rankin Scale, and their potential to differentiate between patients with favourable (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) and poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≥3). Correlations with relative cerebral blood volume and relative cerebral blood flow were tested in patients with available computed tomography perfusion. Very good inter-rater reliability was found for Modified Tan, Miteff and Opercular Index Score ratio, and substantial reliability for Maas. There were no significant correlations between collateral scores and three-months modified Rankin Scale, but significant group differences between patients with favourable and poor outcome for Maas, Miteff and Opercular Index Score ratio. Miteff and Maas were significant predictors of favourable outcome in binary logistic regression analysis. Miteff best differentiated between both outcome groups in receiver-operating characteristics, and Maas reached highest sensitivity for favourable outcome prediction of 96%. All collateral scores significantly correlated with mean relative cerebral blood volume and relative cerebral blood flow. Computed tomography angiography scores are valuable in estimating functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy and reliable across readers. The more complex scores, Maas and Miteff, show the best performances in predicting favourable outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31104586
doi: 10.1177/1971400919847182
pmc: PMC6639643
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
277-286Références
Rofo. 2007 May;179(5):525-9
pubmed: 17436187
Stroke. 2008 Nov;39(11):2986-92
pubmed: 18723425
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Mar;30(3):525-31
pubmed: 19147716
Brain. 2009 Aug;132(Pt 8):2231-8
pubmed: 19509116
Stroke. 2009 Sep;40(9):3001-5
pubmed: 19590055
Stroke. 2011 Dec;42(12):3435-40
pubmed: 21980202
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):113-8
pubmed: 24281229
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Feb;36(2):289-94
pubmed: 25324493
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):11-20
pubmed: 25517348
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18
pubmed: 25671797
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30
pubmed: 25671798
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306
pubmed: 25882510
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;40(5-6):258-69
pubmed: 26484857
Int J Stroke. 2016 Jan;11(1):134-47
pubmed: 26763029
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Jul;37(7):1231-6
pubmed: 27032971
Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2292-8
pubmed: 27491731
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):270-275
pubmed: 27856435
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1179-1186
pubmed: 27965381
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0170247
pubmed: 28081270
J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;44(3):217-222
pubmed: 28249747
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21
pubmed: 29129157
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018 Oct;38(10):1839-1847
pubmed: 29135347
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Apr;27(4):971-977
pubmed: 29217364
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718
pubmed: 29364767
Interv Neuroradiol. 2018 Aug;24(4):398-404
pubmed: 29540086