Left Shifting of Language Related Activity Induced by Bihemispheric tDCS in Postacute Aphasia Following Stroke.
aphasia
brain stimulation
language therapy
picture naming task
transcranial direct current stimulation
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
24
11
2018
accepted:
13
03
2019
entrez:
21
5
2019
pubmed:
21
5
2019
medline:
21
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Both anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left IFG and cathodal stimulation of the right IFG were shown to improve rehabilitation of stroke patients with Broca's aphasia. The study aimed at assessing the impact of a bihemispheric IFG stimulation compared to sham on postacute non-fluent aphasia. Twelve patients with non-fluent aphasia were included at least 4 weeks following cerebral stroke. Ten daily sessions of 2 mA bihemispheric verum or sham tDCS (anode on left IFG and cathode on right IFG) were performed concomitantly with individual language therapy in a double-blinded randomized controlled study with parallel group design. Language functions [i.e., communication (ANELT), picture naming and the Aachen aphasia test (AAT)] were assessed up to 1 month following tDCS. The picture naming task significantly improved (increased number of nouns) at the end of the tDCS procedure in the verum but not sham group. Improvements in the picture naming task and the communication task of the AAT at 4 weeks after tDCS procedure were only seen in the verum group. In patients with postacute cerebral stroke, repeated sessions of tDCS applied on both IFG concomitantly with language therapy were able to induce immediate effects on picture naming presumably due to an early left shift of language-associated function that maintained for 4 weeks. Effects on clinically relevant communicative abilities are likely.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31105510
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00295
pmc: PMC6498872
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
295Références
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;114(11):2220-2; author reply 2222-3
pubmed: 14580622
Cortex. 1978 Mar;14(1):41-9
pubmed: 16295108
Brain. 2006 Jun;129(Pt 6):1371-84
pubmed: 16638796
Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1379-84
pubmed: 16690899
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):18035-40
pubmed: 19004769
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(6):645-50
pubmed: 20042788
Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1229-36
pubmed: 20395612
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28(4):511-29
pubmed: 20714075
Eur J Neurol. 2011 Jul;18(7):935-43
pubmed: 21138505
Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):409-15
pubmed: 21164121
Brain Lang. 2011 Jul;118(1-2):40-50
pubmed: 21459427
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(3):141-52
pubmed: 21586821
Brain Lang. 2011 Dec;119(3):206-13
pubmed: 21864891
Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 Aug;35(4):460-9
pubmed: 22506160
Expert Rev Neurother. 2012 Aug;12(8):973-82
pubmed: 23002940
Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Nov;38(9):3370-7
pubmed: 23930827
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 06;7:539
pubmed: 24046740
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(6):761-71
pubmed: 24047756
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2013 Sep-Oct;47(5):414-22
pubmed: 24166562
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(2):367-79
pubmed: 24398720
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206
pubmed: 25034472
Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):269-76
pubmed: 25464828
Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):769-76
pubmed: 25732786
Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(7):833-45
pubmed: 26109229
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 May;28(5):724-38
pubmed: 26807842
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Oct 15;369:185-190
pubmed: 27653887
Trends Neurosci. 2016 Nov;39(11):782-795
pubmed: 27697295
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92
pubmed: 27866120
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Adv Neurol. 1977;18:41-9
pubmed: 920524