Relief of Neuropathic Pain Through Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition: A Randomized Proof-of-Concept Trial.
Adult
Cetuximab
/ therapeutic use
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
/ drug therapy
Double-Blind Method
ErbB Receptors
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nerve Compression Syndromes
/ drug therapy
Neuralgia
/ drug therapy
Pain Measurement
Proof of Concept Study
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cetuximab
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Compressed Nerve
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Neuropathic Pain
Journal
Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
ISSN: 1526-4637
Titre abrégé: Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100894201
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2019
01 12 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
21
5
2019
medline:
15
9
2020
entrez:
21
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Case reports and a case series have described relief of neuropathic pain (NP) after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-Is). These observations are supported by preclinical findings. The aim of this trial was to explore a potential clinical signal supporting the therapeutic efficacy of EGFR-Is in NP. In a proof-of-concept trial using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, 14 patients with severe, chronic, therapy-resistant NP due to compressed peripheral nerves or complex regional pain syndrome were randomized to receive a single infusion of the EGFR-I cetuximab and placebo in crossover design, followed by a single open-label cetuximab infusion. The mean reduction in daily average pain scores three to seven days after single-blinded cetuximab infusion was 1.73 points (90% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80 to 2.66), conferring a 1.22-point greater reduction than placebo (90% CI = -0.10 to 2.54). Exploratory analyses suggested that pain reduction might be greater in the 14 days after treatment with blinded cetuximab than after placebo. The proportion of patients who reported ≥50% reduction in average pain three to seven days after cetuximab was 36% (14% after placebo), and comparison of overall pain reduction suggests a trend in favor of cetuximab. Skin rash (grade 1-2) was the most frequent side effect (12/14, 86%). This small proof-of-concept evaluation of an EGFR-I against NP did not provide statistical evidence of efficacy. However, substantial reductions in pain were reported, and confidence intervals do not rule out a clinically meaningful treatment effect. Evaluation of EGFR-I against NP therefore warrants further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31106835
pii: 5492034
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz101
doi:
Substances chimiques
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Cetuximab
PQX0D8J21J
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02490436']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2495-2505Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.