Social media and orthodontic treatment from the patient's perspective: a systematic review.


Journal

European journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 1460-2210
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909010

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 21 5 2019
medline: 30 9 2020
entrez: 21 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Social media are one of the most common and easily accessible ways of gaining information about orthodontic treatment. The main objective of this study was to systematically search the literature and determine the various aspects of the interrelationship between social media and orthodontics from the patient's perspective. Electronic database searches of published and unpublished literature were performed. The reference lists of all eligible articles were hand-searched for additional studies. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed individually and in duplicate by the first two authors. One RCT, three retrospective, and four cross-sectional studies were deemed as eligible for inclusion in this review. The studies included patient's statements in social media or results from questionnaires given to patients. The social media reported were with order of frequency: Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Google+, Pinterest, and Instagram. The feelings the patients expressed seemed to be more positive than negative: enthusiasm, self-esteem and pleasure, excitement about the aesthetic result, excitement after braces removal but also antipathy, annoyances, reduced self-esteem, and impatience for removing mechanisms. In addition, one study referred to bullying through Twitter. The high amount of heterogeneity precluded a valid interpretation of the results through pooled estimates. This systematic review demonstrated that information about orthodontics, how the patient feels, and other psychosocial facets are spread through social media. It is intuitive that research relating to the effects and impact of orthodontic interventions should account not only for the physical impacts of treatment but also to encompass patient-centered outcomes. The protocol of this study was not registered in publicly assessable database. None to declare.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Social media are one of the most common and easily accessible ways of gaining information about orthodontic treatment.
OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this study was to systematically search the literature and determine the various aspects of the interrelationship between social media and orthodontics from the patient's perspective.
SEARCH METHODS
Electronic database searches of published and unpublished literature were performed. The reference lists of all eligible articles were hand-searched for additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed individually and in duplicate by the first two authors.
RESULTS
One RCT, three retrospective, and four cross-sectional studies were deemed as eligible for inclusion in this review. The studies included patient's statements in social media or results from questionnaires given to patients. The social media reported were with order of frequency: Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Google+, Pinterest, and Instagram. The feelings the patients expressed seemed to be more positive than negative: enthusiasm, self-esteem and pleasure, excitement about the aesthetic result, excitement after braces removal but also antipathy, annoyances, reduced self-esteem, and impatience for removing mechanisms. In addition, one study referred to bullying through Twitter.
LIMITATIONS
The high amount of heterogeneity precluded a valid interpretation of the results through pooled estimates.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
This systematic review demonstrated that information about orthodontics, how the patient feels, and other psychosocial facets are spread through social media. It is intuitive that research relating to the effects and impact of orthodontic interventions should account not only for the physical impacts of treatment but also to encompass patient-centered outcomes.
REGISTRATION
The protocol of this study was not registered in publicly assessable database.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None to declare.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31107943
pii: 5492385
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz029
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

231-241

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Aikaterini Papadimitriou (A)

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 251 Hellenic Air Force and VA General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Lydia Kakali (L)

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 251 Hellenic Air Force and VA General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Pawel Pazera (P)

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Ioannis Doulis (I)

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Dimitrios Kloukos (D)

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 251 Hellenic Air Force and VA General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH