Co-digestion of wastewater sludge: Choosing the optimal blend.

Anaerobic digestion Carbon-isotopic fractionation Fish Grass Methanogenic pathways

Journal

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1879-2456
Titre abrégé: Waste Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9884362

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 22 08 2018
revised: 06 03 2019
accepted: 07 03 2019
entrez: 22 5 2019
pubmed: 22 5 2019
medline: 13 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) is a promising strategy to increase the methane production of anaerobic digestion plants treating wastewater sludge (WAS). In this work the degradability of six different mixtures of WAS with fish waste (FW) or garden-grass (GG) was evaluated and compared to the three mono-digestions. Degradation performances and methanogenic pathways, determined with the isotopic signatures of biogas, were compared across time. Fish and grass mono-digestion provided a higher final methane production than WAS mono-digestion. In co-digestion the addition of 25% of fish was enough to increase the final methane production from WAS while 50% of grass was necessary. To determine the optimal blend of WAS co-digestion two indicators were specifically designed, representing the maximum potential production (ODI) and the expected production in mono-digestion conditions (MDI). The comparison between these indicators and the experimental results showed that the most productive blend was composed of 75% of co-substrate, fish or grass, with WAS. Indeed, the final methane production was increased by 1.9 times with fish and by 1.7 times with grass associated to an increase of the methane production rate by 1.5 times. Even if the same succession of methanogenic pathways across time was observed for the different mixtures, their relative proportions were different. Sewage sludge degradation was mostly achieved through hydrogenotrophic pathway while acetoclastic pathway was dominant for fish and grass degradation. These results were confirmed by the identification of Archaea with 16S sequencing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31109580
pii: S0956-053X(19)30145-X
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.016
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biofuels 0
Sewage 0
Waste Water 0
Methane OP0UW79H66

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

772-781

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Laëtitia Cardona (L)

Hydrosystems and Bioprocesses Research Unit, Irstea, 1 rue Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, CS 10030, 92761 Antony Cedex, France. Electronic address: laetitia.cardona@irstea.fr.

Camille Levrard (C)

Hydrosystems and Bioprocesses Research Unit, Irstea, 1 rue Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, CS 10030, 92761 Antony Cedex, France. Electronic address: camille.levrard@irstea.fr.

Angeline Guenne (A)

Hydrosystems and Bioprocesses Research Unit, Irstea, 1 rue Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, CS 10030, 92761 Antony Cedex, France. Electronic address: angeline.guenne@irstea.fr.

Olivier Chapleur (O)

Hydrosystems and Bioprocesses Research Unit, Irstea, 1 rue Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, CS 10030, 92761 Antony Cedex, France. Electronic address: olivier.chapleur@irstea.fr.

Laurent Mazéas (L)

Hydrosystems and Bioprocesses Research Unit, Irstea, 1 rue Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, CS 10030, 92761 Antony Cedex, France. Electronic address: laurent.mazeas@irstea.fr.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH