Individualised Indications for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy: Which Criteria Define the Optimal Candidates?

Cytoreductive nephrectomy Kidney cancer Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Presurgical therapy Systemic therapy Targeted therapy

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 14 03 2018
revised: 08 04 2019
accepted: 16 04 2019
pubmed: 22 5 2019
medline: 30 5 2020
entrez: 22 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is controversial. Review of the available evidence about criteria defining CN optimal candidates. Collaborative critical narrative review of the literature focusing on CN oncological outcomes, perioperative morbidity, eligibility criteria, presurgical systemic therapy, and surgical factors. In contrast to observational studies, the Clinical Trial to Assess the Importance of Nephrectomy (CARMENA) trial demonstrated noninferiority of targeted therapy alone relative to CN with targeted therapy. CN is associated with a significant risk of perioperative mortality (0-13%) and major complications (3-36%). Metastatic burden, haematological parameters, performance status, sarcopenia, and genetic mutations have been proposed as CN eligibility criteria. Comprehensive models including local and systemic factors are recommended. The Immediate Surgery or Surgery after sunitinib Malate In Treating Patients with Kidney Cancer (SURTIME) trial reported similar progression-free rate after immediate or deferred CN, and suggests that presurgical systemic therapy can identify candidates for CN, avoiding unnecessary surgery in nonresponders without increasing the risk of perioperative complications. Minimally invasive and nephron-sparing CNs are established surgical strategies in selected patients. No benefit of upfront CN is observed for intermediate- and poor-risk patients who require systemic therapy in randomised controlled trials, and systemic therapy deserves priority over CN in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. These findings are not applicable to all patients with metastatic kidney cancer. CN has a role in favourable cases not requiring immediate systemic therapy or in symptomatic patients. Individual patient selection to identify those patients who might profit the most from CN is critical; however, clinical decision making should be based on comprehensive models. Presurgical systemic therapy is a promising option to avoid unnecessary CN, which is associated with major morbidity. Consideration for systemic therapy deserves priority over cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In patients eligible for systemic therapy, CN does not offer a survival benefit. The indications for CN should be evaluated on an individual basis. Risk scores and response to presurgical systemic therapy can be used for subsequent decision making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31109902
pii: S2588-9311(19)30056-2
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.04.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

365-378

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Alessandro Larcher (A)

Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium. Electronic address: alelarcher@gmail.com.

Christopher J D Wallis (CJD)

ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Axel Bex (A)

Department of Urology, The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Michael L Blute (ML)

Department of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Vincenzo Ficarra (V)

Urologic Section, Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Pediatric Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Arnaud Mejean (A)

Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

Jose A Karam (JA)

Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Hendrik Van Poppel (H)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Sumanta K Pal (SK)

Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH