Individualised Indications for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy: Which Criteria Define the Optimal Candidates?
Cytoreductive nephrectomy
Kidney cancer
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presurgical therapy
Systemic therapy
Targeted therapy
Journal
European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
14
03
2018
revised:
08
04
2019
accepted:
16
04
2019
pubmed:
22
5
2019
medline:
30
5
2020
entrez:
22
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is controversial. Review of the available evidence about criteria defining CN optimal candidates. Collaborative critical narrative review of the literature focusing on CN oncological outcomes, perioperative morbidity, eligibility criteria, presurgical systemic therapy, and surgical factors. In contrast to observational studies, the Clinical Trial to Assess the Importance of Nephrectomy (CARMENA) trial demonstrated noninferiority of targeted therapy alone relative to CN with targeted therapy. CN is associated with a significant risk of perioperative mortality (0-13%) and major complications (3-36%). Metastatic burden, haematological parameters, performance status, sarcopenia, and genetic mutations have been proposed as CN eligibility criteria. Comprehensive models including local and systemic factors are recommended. The Immediate Surgery or Surgery after sunitinib Malate In Treating Patients with Kidney Cancer (SURTIME) trial reported similar progression-free rate after immediate or deferred CN, and suggests that presurgical systemic therapy can identify candidates for CN, avoiding unnecessary surgery in nonresponders without increasing the risk of perioperative complications. Minimally invasive and nephron-sparing CNs are established surgical strategies in selected patients. No benefit of upfront CN is observed for intermediate- and poor-risk patients who require systemic therapy in randomised controlled trials, and systemic therapy deserves priority over CN in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. These findings are not applicable to all patients with metastatic kidney cancer. CN has a role in favourable cases not requiring immediate systemic therapy or in symptomatic patients. Individual patient selection to identify those patients who might profit the most from CN is critical; however, clinical decision making should be based on comprehensive models. Presurgical systemic therapy is a promising option to avoid unnecessary CN, which is associated with major morbidity. Consideration for systemic therapy deserves priority over cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In patients eligible for systemic therapy, CN does not offer a survival benefit. The indications for CN should be evaluated on an individual basis. Risk scores and response to presurgical systemic therapy can be used for subsequent decision making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31109902
pii: S2588-9311(19)30056-2
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.04.007
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365-378Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.