Embolism recovery strategies and nocturnal water loss across species influenced by biogeographic origin.
carbohydrate starvation
drought‐induced mortality
embolism recovery
embolism refilling
hydraulic failure
nocturnal stomatal conductance
nonstructural carbohydrates
xylem embolism
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
16
01
2019
accepted:
25
02
2019
entrez:
22
5
2019
pubmed:
22
5
2019
medline:
22
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Drought-induced tree mortality is expected to increase in future climates with the potential for significant consequences to global carbon, water, and energy cycles. Xylem embolism can accumulate to lethal levels during drought, but species that can refill embolized xylem and recover hydraulic function may be able to avoid mortality. Yet the potential controls of embolism recovery, including cross-biome patterns and plant traits such as nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs), hydraulic traits, and nocturnal stomatal conductance, are unknown. We exposed eight plant species, originating from mesic (tropical and temperate) and semi-arid environments, to drought under ambient and elevated CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 31110684
doi: 10.1002/ece3.5126
pii: ECE35126
pmc: PMC6509402
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.7807247']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5348-5361Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
Funct Plant Biol. 2009 Sep;36(9):815-825
pubmed: 32688691
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Nov;120:232-241
pubmed: 29073538
Tree Physiol. 2014 Feb;34(2):109-22
pubmed: 24488800
Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Dec;17(12):693-700
pubmed: 23099222
Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1977;31:471-505
pubmed: 756635
New Phytol. 2018 Oct;220(1):104-110
pubmed: 30040128
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Sep;33(9):1502-12
pubmed: 20444217
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 3;109(1):233-7
pubmed: 22167807
New Phytol. 2012 Mar;193(4):929-938
pubmed: 22150067
Tree Physiol. 2011 Sep;31(9):932-44
pubmed: 21616926
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Oct;26(10):523-32
pubmed: 21802765
Plant Sci. 2011 Apr;180(4):604-11
pubmed: 21421408
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep;1(9):1285-1291
pubmed: 29046541
Am J Bot. 2006 Sep;93(9):1265-73
pubmed: 21642190
Tree Physiol. 2010 Aug;30(8):1001-15
pubmed: 20566583
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Mar;34(3):514-24
pubmed: 21118423
Tree Physiol. 2018 Jul 1;38(7):1006-1015
pubmed: 29509942
Oecologia. 2001 Feb;126(4):457-461
pubmed: 28547229
Funct Plant Biol. 2008 Jan;34(12):1137-1149
pubmed: 32689444
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 May;31(5):632-45
pubmed: 18088335
Am J Bot. 2004 Mar;91(3):369-85
pubmed: 21653393
Tree Physiol. 2013 Apr;33(4):335-44
pubmed: 23492871
New Phytol. 2018 Jan;217(1):117-126
pubmed: 28940305
Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr 13;9(9):5348-5361
pubmed: 31110684
New Phytol. 2015 Apr;206(2):583-9
pubmed: 27283977
Ecol Lett. 2013 Apr;16(4):545-55
pubmed: 23316756
Plant Cell Environ. 2014 May;37(5):1074-85
pubmed: 24117494
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Apr 24;4:108
pubmed: 23630539
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 15;113(46):E7222-E7230
pubmed: 27799540
Tree Physiol. 2007 Apr;27(4):561-75
pubmed: 17241998
New Phytol. 2015 Nov;208(3):674-83
pubmed: 26058406
Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan;143(1):4-10
pubmed: 17210908
Tree Physiol. 2010 May;30(5):586-96
pubmed: 20332372
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Nov;36(11):1938-49
pubmed: 23701011
New Phytol. 2017 Feb;213(3):1068-1075
pubmed: 27735069
New Phytol. 2015 Jul;207(1):14-27
pubmed: 25773898
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Jun;40(6):858-871
pubmed: 27628165
Tree Physiol. 2013 Nov;33(11):1206-15
pubmed: 24271087
Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):251-263
pubmed: 11841668
Tree Physiol. 2014 Oct;34(10):1047-55
pubmed: 25413023
Tree Physiol. 2015 Jul;35(7):694-705
pubmed: 26116926