Clinical Parameters Outperform Molecular Subtypes for Predicting Outcome in Bladder Cancer: Results from Multiple Cohorts, Including TCGA.
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ analysis
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
/ genetics
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Phenotype
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Transcriptome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
/ genetics
molecular diagnostic techniques
neoplasm grading
neoplasm invasiveness
risk
urinary bladder neoplasms
Journal
The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
22
5
2019
medline:
31
12
2019
entrez:
22
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Studies indicate that molecular subtypes in muscle invasive bladder cancer predict the clinical outcome. We evaluated whether subtyping by a simplified method and established classifications could predict the clinical outcome. We subtyped institutional cohort 1 of 52 patients, including 39 with muscle invasive bladder cancer, an Oncomine™ data set of 151 with muscle invasive bladder cancer and TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data set of 402 with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Subtyping was done using simplified panels (MCG-1 and MCG-Ext) which included only transcripts common in published studies and were analyzed for predicting metastasis, and cancer specific, overall and recurrence-free survival. TCGA data set was further analyzed using the Lund taxonomy, the Bladder Cancer Molecular Taxonomy Group Consensus and TCGA 2017 mRNA subtype classifications. Muscle invasive bladder cancer specimens from cohort 1 and the Oncomine data set showed intratumor heterogeneity for transcript and protein expression. MCG-1 subtypes did not predict the outcome on univariate or Kaplan-Meier analysis. On multivariate analysis N stage (p ≤0.007), T stage (p ≤0.04), M stage (p=0.007) and/or patient age (p=0.01) predicted metastasis, cancer specific and overall survival, and/or the cisplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy response. In TCGA data set publications showed that subtypes risk stratified patients for overall survival. Consistently the MCG-1 and MCG-Ext subtypes were associated with overall but not recurrence-free survival on univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. TCGA data set included 21 low grade specimens of the total of 402 and subtypes associated with tumor grade (p=0.005). However, less than 1% of muscle invasive bladder cancer cases are low grade. In only high grade specimens the MCG-1 and MCG-Ext subtypes could not predict overall survival. On univariate analysis subtypes according to the Bladder Cancer Molecular Taxonomy Group Consensus, TCGA 2017 and the Lund taxonomy were associated with tumor grade (p <0.0001) and overall survival (p=0.01 to <0.0001). Regardless of classification, subtypes had about 50% to 60% sensitivity and specificity to predict overall and recurrence-free survival. On multivariate analyses N stage and lymphovascular invasion consistently predicted recurrence-free and overall survival (p=0.039 and 0.003, respectively). Molecular subtypes reflect bladder tumor heterogeneity and are associated with tumor grade. In multiple cohorts and subtyping classifications the clinical parameters outperformed subtypes for predicting the outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31112107
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000351
pmc: PMC8327783
mid: NIHMS1717766
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
62-72Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : F31 CA210612
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : F31 CA236437
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA176691
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA227277
Pays : United States
Références
Cancer Cell. 2016 Jul 11;30(1):27-42
pubmed: 27321955
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):433-434
pubmed: 30237022
Mod Pathol. 2018 Dec;31(12):1869-1881
pubmed: 29967424
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 6;7(49):80164-80174
pubmed: 27845906
Cancer Cell. 2014 Feb 10;25(2):152-65
pubmed: 24525232
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 10;24(5):778-89
pubmed: 16432078
Nature. 2014 Mar 20;507(7492):315-22
pubmed: 24476821
Mol Cancer. 2010 Jan 08;9:3
pubmed: 20059769
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 1;13(15 Pt 1):4407-14
pubmed: 17671123
Nat Genet. 2016 Dec;48(12):1490-1499
pubmed: 27749842
Semin Urol. 1993 Nov;11(4):177-92
pubmed: 8290824
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 25;111(8):3110-5
pubmed: 24520177
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jan;15(1):25-41
pubmed: 25533674
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Aug 15;25(16):5082-5093
pubmed: 30224344
Oncotarget. 2018 May 25;9(40):25935-25945
pubmed: 29899832
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):423-432
pubmed: 30213523
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 15;18(12):3377-86
pubmed: 22553347
Cancer. 2013 Jan 1;119(1):61-71
pubmed: 22736438
Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 Aug 20;20(10):77
pubmed: 30128829
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1945-52
pubmed: 27001593
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):544-554
pubmed: 28390739
Cell. 2017 Oct 19;171(3):540-556.e25
pubmed: 28988769
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):354-365
pubmed: 28365159
Curr Probl Surg. 1981 Apr;18(4):205-79
pubmed: 7016460
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 27;8(1):3737
pubmed: 29487377
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 15;7(1):11702
pubmed: 28916750
EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:105-117
pubmed: 27612592