Justice and the Possibility of Good Moralism in Bioethics.
consequentialist tradition
ethics
harm principle
justice
moral principles
moralism
morality
Journal
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
ISSN: 1469-2147
Titre abrégé: Camb Q Healthc Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9208482
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
entrez:
23
5
2019
pubmed:
23
5
2019
medline:
15
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Moralism in bioethics and elsewhere means going beyond accepted moral principles, either by exaggerating good ethical concerns, by applying them to areas where they do not belong, or simply by assuming anything else than concrete physical or mental harm as normative guides. This paper explores the conceptual background of moralism especially in the consequentialist tradition, presents cases of allegedly bad moralism in the light of this exploration, introduces six approaches to justice, and argues that these approaches question our prevailing views on the goodness and badness of moralism in its various forms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31113512
pii: S0963180119000082
doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000082
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM