Justice and the Possibility of Good Moralism in Bioethics.

consequentialist tradition ethics harm principle justice moral principles moralism morality

Journal

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
ISSN: 1469-2147
Titre abrégé: Camb Q Healthc Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9208482

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
entrez: 23 5 2019
pubmed: 23 5 2019
medline: 15 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Moralism in bioethics and elsewhere means going beyond accepted moral principles, either by exaggerating good ethical concerns, by applying them to areas where they do not belong, or simply by assuming anything else than concrete physical or mental harm as normative guides. This paper explores the conceptual background of moralism especially in the consequentialist tradition, presents cases of allegedly bad moralism in the light of this exploration, introduces six approaches to justice, and argues that these approaches question our prevailing views on the goodness and badness of moralism in its various forms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31113512
pii: S0963180119000082
doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000082
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

236-263

Auteurs

Articles similaires

Moral distress in pediatric nurses: A scoping review protocol.

Haiyan Zhou, Huiling Liao, Yuanyuan Huang et al.
1.00
Humans Nurses, Pediatric Morals Stress, Psychological Pediatric Nursing

Equity and justice in medical education: mapping a longitudinal curriculum across 4 years.

Hailey Broughton-Jones, Jean-Marie Alves-Bradford, Jonathan Amiel et al.
1.00
Humans Curriculum Health Equity Social Justice United States
Humans Students, Medical Female Male Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans Algorithms Scientific Misconduct Research Personnel Male

Classifications MeSH