Pressure ulcer summit 2018: An interdisciplinary approach to improve our understanding of the risk of pressure-induced tissue damage.
Journal
Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
ISSN: 1524-475X
Titre abrégé: Wound Repair Regen
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9310939
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
29
08
2018
revised:
12
02
2019
accepted:
07
05
2019
pubmed:
24
5
2019
medline:
7
7
2020
entrez:
24
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pressure ulcers (PrUs) affect approximately 2.5 million patients and account for 60,000 deaths annually. They are associated with an additional annual cost of $43,000 per related hospital stay and a total cost to the US health care system as high as $25 billion. Despite the implementation of national and international PrU prevention guidelines and toolkits, rates of facility-acquired PrU s and PrUs in people with spinal cord injury are still high. A new paradigm is needed that distinguishes between prevention and treatment research methods and includes not only the causative factors of pressure and tissue deformation but also patient-specific anatomical differences and the concomitant biological cellular processes, including reperfusion injury, toxic metabolites, ischemia, cell distortion, impaired lymphatic drainage, and impaired interstitial fluid flow that compound existing tissue damage. The purpose of this article is to summarize the highlights from the first annual Pressure Ulcer Summit held February 9-10, 2018 in Atlanta, Georgia (sponsored by the Association for the Advancement of Wound Care in partnership with multiple professional organizations). This international, interdisciplinary summit brought together key stakeholders in wound care and PrU prevention and management to highlight advances in pathophysiology of pressure-induced tissue damage; explore challenges in current terminologies, documentation, and data collection; describe innovations in clinical care; and identify research opportunities to advance the science of PrU prevention and management.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
497-508Informations de copyright
© 2019 by the Wound Healing Society.
Références
U.S. Congress. Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.. Congressional Record, 2017-2018.
Ankrom MA, Bennett RG, Sprigle S, Langemo D, Black JM, Berlowitz DR, et al. Pressure-related deep tissue injury under intact skin and the current pressure ulcer staging systems. Adv Skin Wound Care 2005; 18: 35-42.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. In: Haesler E , editor European pressure ulcer advisory panel, Alliance PPPI. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. Osborne Park, Australia, Cambridge Media, 2014.
Coleman S, Nixon J, Keen J, Wilson L, McGinnis E, Dealey C, et al. A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework. J Adv Nurs 2014; 70: 2222-34.
Edsberg LE, Black JM, Goldberg M, McNichol L, Moore L, Sieggreen M. Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel pressure injury staging system: revised pressure injury staging system. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2016; 43: 585-97.
Braden B, Bergstrom N. A conceptual schema for the study of the etiology of pressure sores. Rehabil Nurs 1987; 12: 8-12.
Defloor T. The risk of pressure sores: a conceptual scheme. J Clin Nurs 1999; 8: 206-16.
Benoit R, Mion L. Risk factors for pressure ulcer development in critically ill patients: a conceptual model to guide research. Res Nurs Health 2012; 35: 340-62.
Shoham N, Levy A, Shabshin N, Benayahu D, Gefen A. A multiscale modeling framework for studying the mechanobiology of sarcopenic obesity. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2017; 16: 275-95.
Slomka N, Or-Tzadikaris S, Sassun D, Gefen A. Membrane-stretch-induced cell death in deep tissue injury: computer model studies. Cell Mol Bioeng 2009; 2: 118-32.
Slomka N, Gefen A. Relationship between strain levels and permeability of the plasma membrane in statically stretched myoblasts. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40: 606-18.
Leopold E, Gefen A. A simple stochastic model to explain the sigmoid nature of the strain-time cellular tolerance curve. J Tissue Viability 2012; 21: 27-36.
Gefen A, Weihs D. Cytoskeleton and plasma-membrane damage resulting from exposure to sustained deformations: a review of the mechanobiology of chronic wounds. Med Eng Phys 2016; 38: 828-33.
Tenenbaum S, Shabshin N, Levy A, Herman A, Gefen A. Effects of foot posture and heel padding devices on soft tissue deformations under the heel in supine position in males: MRI studies. J Rehabil Res Dev 2013; 50: 1149-56.
Katzengold R, Gefen A. What makes a good head positioner for preventing occipital pressure ulcers. Int Wound J 2018; 15: 243-9.
Linder-Ganz E, Engelberg S, Scheinowitz M, Gefen A. Pressure-time cell death threshold for albino rat skeletal muscles as related to pressure sore biomechanics. J Biomech 2006; 39: 2725-32.
Gefen A. The compression intensity index: a practical anatomical estimate of the biomechanical risk for a deep tissue injury. Technol Health Care 2008; 16: 141-9.
Brienza D, Vallely J, Karg P, Akins J, Gefen A. An MRI investigation of the effects of user anatomy and wheelchair cushion type on tissue deformation. J Tissue Viability 2018; 27: 42-53.
Shabshin N, Ougortsin V, Zoizner G, Gefen A. Evaluation of the effect of trunk tilt on compressive soft tissue deformations under the ischial tuberosities using weight-bearing MRI. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010; 25: 402-8.
Shabshin N, Zoizner G, Herman A, Ougortsin V, Gefen A. Use of weight-bearing MRI for evaluating wheelchair cushions based on internal soft-tissue deformations under ischial tuberosities. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010; 47: 31-42.
Portnoy S, Siev-Ner I, Shabshin N, Kristal A, Yizhar Z, Gefen A. Patient-specific analyses of deep tissue loads post transtibial amputation in residual limbs of multiple prosthetic users. J Biomech 2009; 42: 2686-93.
Portnoy S, Yizhar Z, Shabshin N, Itzchak Y, Kristal A, Dotan-Marom Y, et al. Internal mechanical conditions in the soft tissues of a residual limb of a trans-tibial amputee. J Biomech 2008; 41: 1897-909.
Linder-Ganz E, Shabshin N, Gefen A. Patient-specific modeling of deep tissue injury biomechanics in an unconscious patient who developed myonecrosis after prolonged lying. J Tissue Viability 2009; 18: 62-71.
Linder-Ganz E, Shabshin N, Itzchak Y, Gefen A. Assessment of mechanical conditions in sub-dermal tissues during sitting: a combined experimental-MRI and finite element approach. J Biomech 2007; 40: 1443-54.
Linder-Ganz E, Shabshin N, Itzchak Y, Yizhar Z, Siev-Ner I, Gefen A. Strains and stresses in sub-dermal tissues of the buttocks are greater in paraplegics than in healthy during sitting. J Biomech 2008; 41: 567-80.
Levy A, Gefen A. Computer modeling studies to assess whether a prophylactic dressing reduces the risk for deep tissue injury in the heels of supine patients with diabetes. Ostomy Wound Manage 2016; 62: 42-52.
Lemmer D, Alvarado N, Henzel MK, Richmond M, McDaniel J, Graebert J, Schwartz K, Sun J, Bogie KM. What lies beneath: Why some pressure injuries may be unpreventable for individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 100: 1042-49.
Stojadinovic O, Minkiewicz J, Sawaya A, Bourne JW, Torzilli P, de Rivero Vaccari JP, et al. Deep tissue injury in development of pressure ulcers: a decrease of inflammasome activation and changes in human skin morphology in response to aging and mechanical load. PLoS One 2013; 8: e69223.
Hong SJ, Jin DP, Buck DW 2nd, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA. Impaired response of mature adipocytes of diabetic mice to hypoxia. Exp Cell Res 2011; 317: 2299-307.
Hong SJ, Park E, Xu W, Jia S, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA. Response of human mature adipocytes to hypoxia-reoxygenation. Cytotherapy 2014; 16: 1656-65.
Gust MJ, Hong SJ, Fang RC, Lanier ST, Buck DW 2nd, Nunez JM, et al. Adipose tissue drives response to ischemia-reperfusion injury in a murine pressure sore model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139: 1128e-38e.
Steinberg JP, Gurjala AN, Jia S, Hong SJ, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA. Evaluating the effects of subclinical, cyclic ischemia-reperfusion injury on wound healing using a novel device in the rabbit ear. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72: 698-705.
The financial impact of pressure ulcers, Leaf Healthcare Inc., White paper, 2016.
Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, Paralyzed Veterans Association. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury. http://www.pva.org/media/pdf/CPG_PressureUlcer.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed May 30, 2019.
Wilchesky M, Lungu O. Predictive and concurrent validity of the Braden scale in long-term care: a meta-analysis. Wound Repair Regen 2015; 23: 44-56.
Krishnan S, Brick RS, Karg PE, Tzen YT, Garber SL, Sowa GA, et al. Predictive validity of the spinal cord injury pressure ulcer scale (SCIPUS) in acute care and inpatient rehabilitation in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2016; 38: 401-9.
Mortenson WB, Miller WC. Team SR. a review of scales for assessing the risk of developing a pressure ulcer in individuals with SCI. Spinal Cord 2008; 46: 168-75.
Luther SL, Thomason SS, Sabharwal S, Finch DK, McCart J, Toyinbo P, et al. Leveraging electronic health care record information to measure pressure ulcer risk in veterans with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2017; 6: e3.
Al-Dirini RM, Reed MP, Thewlis D. Deformation of the gluteal soft tissues during sitting. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2015; 30: 662-8.
Sonenblum SE, Sprigle SH, Cathcart JM, Winder RJ. 3D anatomy and deformation of the seated buttocks. J Tissue Viability 2015; 24: 51-61.
Griswold LH, Griffin RL, Swain T, Kerby JD. Validity of the Braden scale in grading pressure ulcers in trauma and burn patients. J Surg Res 2017; 219: 151-7.
Cho I, Noh M. Braden scale: evaluation of clinical usefulness in an intensive care unit. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66: 293-302.
Tescher AN, Branda ME, Byrne TJ, Naessens JM. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2012; 39: 282-91.
Deng X, Yu T, Hu A. Predicting the risk for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in critical care patients. Crit Care Nurs 2017; 37: e1-e11.
Fulbrook P, Anderson A. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (conscious level, mobility, Haemodynamics, oxygenation, nutrition) index with three scales. J Adv Nurs 2016; 72: 680-92.
Tannen A, Balzer K, Kottner J, Dassen T, Halfens R, Mertens E. Diagnostic accuracy of two pressure ulcer risk scales and a generic nursing assessment tool. A psychometric comparison. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 1510-8.
Compton F, Hoffmann F, Hortig T, Strauss M, Frey J, Zidek W, et al. Pressure ulcer predictors in ICU patients: nursing skin assessment versus objective parameters. J Wound Care 2008; 17: 417-20.
Balzer K, Pohl C, Dassen T, Halfens R. The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and care dependency scales: comparing their validity when identifying patients' pressure sore risk. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34: 389-98.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Preventing Pressure Ulcers in Hospitals: A Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care, 2014.
Cox J. Pressure injury risk factors in adult critical care patients: a review of the literature. Ostomy Wound Manage 2017; 63: 30-43.
Borghardt AT, Prado TN, Bicudo SD, Castro DS, Bringuente ME. Pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: incidence and associated factors. Rev Bras Enferm 2016; 69: 460-7.
Alderden J, Whitney JD, Taylor SM, Zaratkiewicz S. Risk profile characteristics associated with outcomes of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a retrospective review. Crit Care Nurse 2011; 31: 30-43.
Kirkland-Kyhn H, Zaratkiewicz S, Teleten O, Young HM. Caring for aging skin. Am J Nurs 2018; 118: 60-3.
Rondinelli J, Zuniga S, Kipnis P, Kawar LN, Liu V, Escobar GJ. Hospital-acquired pressure injury: risk-adjusted comparisons in an integrated healthcare delivery system. Nurs Res 2018; 67: 16-25.
Varghese J, Kleine M, Gessner SI, Sandmann S, Dugas M. Effects of computerized decision support system implementations on patient outcomes in inpatient care: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25: 593-602.
Lyder C, Ayello E. Pressure ulcers: a patient safety issue. In: Hughes R , editor Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. State operations manual, appendix PP: guidance to surveyors for long term care facilities, 2017. http://www.cms.gov. Baltimore, MD. Accessed May 30, 2019.
Ahn H, Cowan L, Garvan C, Lyon D, Stechmiller J. Risk factors for pressure ulcers including suspected deep tissue injury in nursing home facility residents: analysis of National Minimum Data set 3.0. Adv Skin Wound Care 2016; 29: 178-90 quiz E1.
Beitz JM. Pharmacologic impact (aka "breaking bad") of medications on wound healing and wound development: a literature-based overview. Ostomy Wound Manage 2017; 63: 18-35.
Moore ZE, Cowman S. Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2: CD006471.
Black J, Baharestani M, Cuddigan J, Dorner B, Edsberg L, Langemo D, et al. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system. Dermatol Nurs 2007; 19: 343-9 quiz 50.
Simman R. Early identification of deep tissue injury using long-wave infrared thermography, 2017.
Bates-Jensen BM, McCreath HE, Kono A, Apeles NC, Alessi C. Subepidermal moisture predicts erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in nursing home residents: a pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 1199-205.
Mayrovitz HN. Assessing local tissue edema in postmastectomy lymphedema. Lymphology 2007; 40: 87-94.
Mayrovitz HN, McClymont A, Pandya N. Skin tissue water assessed via tissue dielectric constant measurements in persons with and without diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013; 15: 60-5.
Goretsky MJ, Supp AP, Greenhalgh DG, Warden GD, Boyce ST. Surface electrical capacitance as an index of epidermal barrier properties of composite skin substitutes and skin autografts. Wound Repair Regen 1995; 3: 419-25.
Harrow JJ, Mayrovitz HN. Subepidermal moisture surrounding pressure ulcers in persons with a spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med 2014; 37: 719-28.
Guihan M, Bates-Jenson BM, Chun S, Parachuri R, Chin AS, McCreath H. Assessing the feasibility of subepidermal moisture to predict erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in persons with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med 2012; 35: 46-52.
Bates-Jensen BM, McCreath HE, Pongquan V. Subepidermal moisture is associated with early pressure ulcer damage in nursing home residents with dark skin tones: pilot findings. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009; 36: 277-84.
Bates-Jensen BM, McCreath HE, Pongquan V, Apeles NC. Subepidermal moisture differentiates erythema and stage I pressure ulcers in nursing home residents. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16: 189-97.
Bates-Jensen BM, McCreath HE, Nakagami G, Patlan A. Subepidermal moisture detection of heel pressure injury: the pressure ulcer detection study outcomes. Int Wound J 2018; 15: 297-309.
Bates-Jensen BM, McCreath HE, Patlan A. Subepidermal moisture detection of pressure induced tissue damage on the trunk: the pressure ulcer detection study outcomes. Wound Repair Regen 2017; 25: 502-11.
Padula CA, Paradis H, Goodwin R, Lynch J, Hegerich-Bartula D. Prevention of medical device-related pressure injuries associated with respiratory equipment use in a critical care unit: a quality improvement project. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017; 44: 138-41.
Padula WV, Millis MA, Worku AD, Pronovost PJ, Bridges JF, Meltzer DO. Individualized cost-effectiveness analysis of patient-centered care: a case series of hospitalized patient preferences departing from practice-based guidelines. J Med Econ 2017; 20: 288-96.
Caplan AL. Not my turn. Lancet 2012; 380: 968-9.
Sutcliffe KM, Paine L, Pronovost PJ. Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26: 248-51.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Reliable systems and processes, 2018. http://www.IHI.org. Accessed May 30, 2019.
Wound O. Continence nurses society-Wound guidelines task F. WOCN 2016 guideline for prevention and Management of Pressure Injuries (ulcers): an executive summary. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017; 44: 241-6.
National Quality Forum. List of SREs, 2018.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) 2017. http://www.cms.gov. Baltimore MD. Accessed May 30, 2019.
Joint Commission. National patient safety goals presentation, 2018.
AMDA-The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Pressure Ulcers and Other Wounds Clinical Practice Guideline. Columbia, MD, 2017.
Ham WH, Schoonhoven L, Schuurmans MJ, Veugelers R, Leenen LP. Pressure ulcer education improves interrater reliability, identification, and classification skills by emergency nurses and physicians. J Emerg Nurs 2015; 41: 43-51.
Levine SM, Sinno S, Levine JP, Saadeh PB. An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69: 482-4.
White-Chu EF, Kiely DK. Factors associated with physician and nurse practitioner pressure ulcer staging practices in rehabilitative and long term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012; 13: 748-51.
Magliato B, Davis S, Labieniec K. The inpatient WOCN role demonstrates cost-effectiveness in addition to clinical effectiveness and positive patient outcomes. Paper presented at the Connecticut Nursing Research Alliance Conference, Hartford, CT, 2017.
Meddings JA, Reichert H, Hofer T, McMahon LF Jr. Hospital report cards for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: how good are the grades? Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 505-13.
Dixon-Woods M, Leslie M, Bion J, Tarrant C. What counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety program. Milbank Q 2012; 90: 548-91.
Smith SN, Reichert HA, Ameling JM, Meddings J. Dissecting leapfrog: how well do leapfrog safe practices scores correlate with hospital compare ratings and penalties, and how much do they matter? Med Care 2017; 55: 606-14.
Brindle T. Pressure ulcer staging: a superficial and deep debate. 2017 Symposium on Advanced Wound Care, 2017.
Doughty D. Stage 2 pressure injury. 2017 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, 2017.
Padula WV, Gibbons RD, Pronovost PJ, Hedeker D, Mishra MK, Makic MB, et al. Using clinical data to predict high-cost performance coding issues associated with pressure ulcers: a multilevel cohort model. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24: e95-e102.
Noonan C, Quigley S, Curley MA. Using the Braden Q scale to predict pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Nurs 2011; 26: 566-75.
Boyle DK, Bergquist-Beringer S, Cramer E. Relationship of wound, ostomy, and continence certified nurses and healthcare-acquired conditions in acute care hospitals. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017; 44: 283-92.
Padula W. Let's start at the top: getting administrative buy-in--presentation slides.National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Conference, 2017.
Saunders K. View from here: building and justifying a comprehensive WOC nurse team. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2016; 43: 341-5.
American Nurses Association, editor. Nursing: scope and standards of practice, 3rd ed. American Nurses Association, Silver Spring, MD, 2015.
Sullivan N, Schoelles KM. Preventing in-facility pressure ulcers as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 410-6.
Stechmiller JK, Cowan L, Whitney JD, Phillips L, Aslam R, Barbul A, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16: 151-68.
Cox J. Predictors of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients. Am J Crit Care 2011; 20: 364-75.
Bolton L. Which pressure ulcer risk assessment scales are valid for use in the clinical setting? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34: 368-81.
Thomas DR. Are all pressure ulcers avoidable? J Am Med Dir Assoc 2001; 2: 297-301.
Xakellis GC, Frantz RA, Lewis A, Harvey P. Translating pressure ulcer guidelines into practice: it's harder than it sounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2001; 14: 249-56, 58.
Hiser B, Rochette J, Philbin S, Lowerhouse N, Terburgh C, Pietsch C. Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention program and enhancing the role of the CWOCN: impact on outcomes. Ostomy Wound Manage 2006; 52: 48-59.
Padula WV, Mishra MK, Makic MB, Sullivan PW. Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Care 2011; 49: 385-92.
Schmitt S, Andries MK, Ashmore PM, Brunette G, Judge K, Bonham PA. WOCN Society position paper: avoidable versus unavoidable pressure ulcers/injuries. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017; 44: 458-68.
Levine JM. Skin failure: an emerging concept. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17: 666-9.
Delmore B, Cox J, Rolnitzky L, Chu A, Stolfi A. Differentiating a pressure ulcer from acute skin failure in the adult critical care patient. Adv Skin Wound Care 2015; 28: 514-24 quiz 25-6.
Thomason SS, Graves BA, Madaris L. A pilot study to evaluate the role of the spinal cord impairment pressure ulcer monitoring tool (SCI-PUMT) in clinical decisions for pressure ulcer treatment. Ostomy Wound Manage 2014; 60: 28-36.
Thomason SS, Luther SL, Powell-Cope GM, Harrow JJ, Palacios P. Validity and reliability of a pressure ulcer monitoring tool for persons with spinal cord impairment. J Spinal Cord Med 2014; 37: 317-27.
Thomason SS, Powell-Cope G, Peterson MJ, Guihan M, Wallen ES, Olney CM, et al. A multisite quality improvement project to standardize the assessment of pressure ulcer healing in veterans with spinal cord injuries/disorders. Adv Skin Wound Care 2016; 29: 269-76.
Balzer K, Kottner J. Evidence-based practices in pressure ulcer prevention: lost in implementation? Int J Nurs Stud 2015; 52: 1655-8.
Dunzweiler S, Gammons K, Hinson L. Taking the pressure off in the ICU. Nurs Manage 2011; 42: 50-2.
Elliott R, McKinley S, Fox V. Quality improvement program to reduce the prevalence of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care 2008; 17: 328-34 quiz 35; discussion 36-7.