Occupational health outcomes among international migrant workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
The Lancet. Global health
ISSN: 2214-109X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
20
12
2018
revised:
25
02
2019
accepted:
29
03
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
27
5
2020
entrez:
25
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Globally, there are more than 150 million international migrant workers-individuals who are employed outside of their country of origin-comprising the largest international migrant group. A substantial number of migrants work in hazardous and exploitative environments, where they might be at considerable risk of injury and ill health. However, little data on occupational health outcomes of migrant workers exist, with which to inform global policy making and delivery of health services. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, Ovid Global Health, and PsychINFO databases for primary research published between Jan 1, 2008, and Jan 24, 2018, reporting occupational health outcomes among international migrant workers (defined as individuals who are or have been employed outside their country of origin), without language or geographical restrictions. We excluded studies containing mixed cohorts of migrants and native workers in which migrant data could not be disaggregated, and studies that did not explicitly report migrant status. The main outcome was prevalence of occupational health outcomes (defined as any injury, mortality, or physical or psychiatric morbidity due to an individual's work or workplace environment) among international migrant workers. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects models. The study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018099465. Of the 1218 studies identified by our search, 36 studies were included in our systematic review, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The systematic review included occupational health outcomes for 12 168 international migrant workers employed in 13 countries and territories, mostly employed in unskilled manual labour. Migrant workers originated from 25 low-income and middle-income countries, and worked in the following sectors: agriculture; domestic, retail, and service sectors; construction and trade; and manufacturing and processing. Migrant workers had various psychiatric and physical morbidities, and workplace accidents and injuries were relatively common. In the meta-analysis, among 7260 international migrant workers, the pooled prevalence of having at least one occupational morbidity was 47% (95% CI 29-64; I International migrant workers are at considerable risk of work-related ill health and injury, and their health needs are critically overlooked in research and policy. Governments, policy makers, and businesses must enforce and improve occupational health and safety measures, which should be accompanied by accessible, affordable, and appropriate health care and insurance coverage to meet the care needs of this important working population. Wellcome Trust.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Globally, there are more than 150 million international migrant workers-individuals who are employed outside of their country of origin-comprising the largest international migrant group. A substantial number of migrants work in hazardous and exploitative environments, where they might be at considerable risk of injury and ill health. However, little data on occupational health outcomes of migrant workers exist, with which to inform global policy making and delivery of health services.
METHODS
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, Ovid Global Health, and PsychINFO databases for primary research published between Jan 1, 2008, and Jan 24, 2018, reporting occupational health outcomes among international migrant workers (defined as individuals who are or have been employed outside their country of origin), without language or geographical restrictions. We excluded studies containing mixed cohorts of migrants and native workers in which migrant data could not be disaggregated, and studies that did not explicitly report migrant status. The main outcome was prevalence of occupational health outcomes (defined as any injury, mortality, or physical or psychiatric morbidity due to an individual's work or workplace environment) among international migrant workers. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects models. The study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018099465.
FINDINGS
Of the 1218 studies identified by our search, 36 studies were included in our systematic review, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The systematic review included occupational health outcomes for 12 168 international migrant workers employed in 13 countries and territories, mostly employed in unskilled manual labour. Migrant workers originated from 25 low-income and middle-income countries, and worked in the following sectors: agriculture; domestic, retail, and service sectors; construction and trade; and manufacturing and processing. Migrant workers had various psychiatric and physical morbidities, and workplace accidents and injuries were relatively common. In the meta-analysis, among 7260 international migrant workers, the pooled prevalence of having at least one occupational morbidity was 47% (95% CI 29-64; I
INTERPRETATION
International migrant workers are at considerable risk of work-related ill health and injury, and their health needs are critically overlooked in research and policy. Governments, policy makers, and businesses must enforce and improve occupational health and safety measures, which should be accompanied by accessible, affordable, and appropriate health care and insurance coverage to meet the care needs of this important working population.
FUNDING
Wellcome Trust.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31122905
pii: S2214-109X(19)30204-9
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30204-9
pmc: PMC6565984
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e872-e882Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 206602/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2003 May;14(2):153-64
pubmed: 12739296
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2005 Aug 31;1:13
pubmed: 16135246
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007 Apr;33(2):96-104
pubmed: 17460797
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2007 Oct 30;3:24
pubmed: 17971211
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;44(3):208-16
pubmed: 18787746
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Demography. 2009 Aug;46(3):535-51
pubmed: 19771943
Gac Sanit. 2009 Dec;23 Suppl 1:115-21
pubmed: 19880220
Am J Ind Med. 2010 Apr;53(4):329-37
pubmed: 20196095
Int J Public Health. 2010 Oct;55(5):357-71
pubmed: 20437193
Ind Health. 2010;48(3):283-91
pubmed: 20562503
J Agromedicine. 2011 Jan;16(1):72-80
pubmed: 21213166
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011 Mar 28;11:3
pubmed: 21443802
J Immigr Minor Health. 2011 Dec;13(6):1027-32
pubmed: 21503739
J Agromedicine. 2012 Jan;17(1):63-9
pubmed: 22191504
J Agromedicine. 2012 Jan;17(1):70-80
pubmed: 22191505
J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Jun;14(3):379-85
pubmed: 22286606
Am J Public Health. 2012 May;102 Suppl 2:S272-8
pubmed: 22401520
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Feb;56(2):206-15
pubmed: 22618638
J Agromedicine. 2012;17(3):277-87
pubmed: 22732068
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Feb;56(2):197-205
pubmed: 22847516
Saf Health Work. 2011 Jun;2(2):183-93
pubmed: 22953201
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Jul;56(7):806-17
pubmed: 23255315
J Immigr Minor Health. 2014 Oct;16(5):926-33
pubmed: 23430462
Int J Dermatol. 2013 Nov;52(11):1342-8
pubmed: 23451943
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 May 03;10(5):1815-30
pubmed: 23644829
Am J Ind Med. 2014 Mar;57(3):362-9
pubmed: 23996875
Am J Ind Med. 2014 May;57(5):605-14
pubmed: 24343776
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Jul;50(5):619-28
pubmed: 24370752
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2013 Oct-Dec;19(4):261-77
pubmed: 24588033
South Med J. 2014 Jun;107(6):374-9
pubmed: 24945173
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 10;14:300
pubmed: 25011488
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2016;71(2):66-73
pubmed: 25158121
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015;21(1):5-13
pubmed: 25291983
Glob Health Action. 2015 Jan 24;8:25749
pubmed: 25626624
Arch Public Health. 2014 Nov 10;72(1):39
pubmed: 25810908
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(4):539-46
pubmed: 26694006
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2016;46(3):813-82
pubmed: 27066611
Am J Ind Med. 2016 Dec;59(12):1120-1129
pubmed: 27747910
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Jan;60(1):35-44
pubmed: 27779308
Ethn Health. 2018 Feb;23(2):174-193
pubmed: 27846733
J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Jun;19(3):511-522
pubmed: 27873057
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Mar 9;2(2):e000213
pubmed: 28589024
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;26(Suppl 1):S61-S67
pubmed: 28625039
Int J Prev Med. 2017 Sep 06;8:68
pubmed: 28966757
BMC Womens Health. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):98
pubmed: 29017558
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:351-365
pubmed: 29400993
Ethn Health. 2018 May 23;:1-18
pubmed: 29792072
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 20;18(1):777
pubmed: 29925353
Saf Health Work. 2018 Jun;9(2):192-202
pubmed: 29928534
Saf Health Work. 2018 Mar;9(1):53-58
pubmed: 30363074
Lancet. 2018 Dec 15;392(10164):2606-2654
pubmed: 30528486
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Sep;41(6):819-28
pubmed: 8571153