Pharmacy-supported interventions at transitions of care: an umbrella review.
Care transitions
Medication reconciliation
Pharmacists
Umbrella review
Journal
International journal of clinical pharmacy
ISSN: 2210-7711
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Pharm
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101554912
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
30
11
2018
accepted:
10
04
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
21
1
2020
entrez:
25
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Medication discrepancies arising at care transitions are prevalent and are linked with adverse drug events and increased healthcare utilization. Evidence is lacking about which pharmacy-supported interventions at care transitions are most effective for both the patient and the healthcare system. Aim of the review To invesitigate the content and effect of pharmacy-supported interventions at transitions of care. Method The PubMed, Ovid/Medline and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to May 2018. Included reviews investigated any intervention related to medication therapy performed by pharmacists or multiple healthcare professionals, including a pharmacist, at transition points in any healthcare setting. Reviews were excluded if interventions were not clearly defined or were not performed at care transitions or were not related to medications. A quality assessment was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. The data extracted included general characteristics, methodology, point of transition, pharmacy-supported interventions and outcomes. For systematic reviews, narrative conclusions were extracted. For meta analyses, reported relative risks or odds ratios were extracted along with the 95% confidence intervals. Results Nine systematic reviews and 5 meta-analyses reporting 162 studies were included. The interventions analysed included medication reconciliation (7 reviews) and composite interventions (7 reviews). Six studies reviewed interventions performed by pharmacists alone, while 8 studies explored interventions by different healthcare professionals, including a pharmacist. A positive effect on either medication discrepancies or (potential) ADEs was observed in all reviews. Mixed effects were observed for hospitalizations rates (9 reviews) and costs (4 reviews), regardless of the intervention applied. Mixed effects were also observed for both medication reconciliation and composite interventions on the number of emergency department visit. Interventions showed no significant effect on mortality (4 reviews). The quality of the reviews showed significant variability. Conclusion Pharmacy-supported interventions at transitions of care are heterogeneous and potentially improve medication safety, but show no significant effect on mortality. The effect on healthcare utilization and costs is inconclusive.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31123900
doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00833-3
pii: 10.1007/s11096-019-00833-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
831-852Références
BMJ. 2004 Jul 3;329(7456):15-9
pubmed: 15231615
Pharm World Sci. 2004 Dec;26(6):353-60
pubmed: 15683106
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):510-5
pubmed: 16129874
Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e03
pubmed: 16896387
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):216-23
pubmed: 18519629
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Apr;83(1):22-8
pubmed: 20554422
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 Jan-Feb;8(1):60-75
pubmed: 21511543
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Dec;33(6):909-17
pubmed: 21979148
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jul 23;172(14):1057-69
pubmed: 22733210
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Nov;32(11):e326-37
pubmed: 23108810
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):397-403
pubmed: 23460096
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Sep;25(4):403-17
pubmed: 23639854
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1040-52
pubmed: 24022724
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):608-22
pubmed: 24161491
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013 Mar;(211):1-945
pubmed: 24423049
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Oct;48(10):1298-312
pubmed: 25048794
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Dec;36(6):1101-14
pubmed: 25218003
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;80(5):936-48
pubmed: 26149372
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Aug;21(8):614-36
pubmed: 26233535
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Sep 1;72(17 Suppl 2):S58-69
pubmed: 26272894
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e010003
pubmed: 26908524
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Apr;41(2):128-44
pubmed: 26913812
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 May-Jun;56(3):303-9
pubmed: 27150224
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Mar - Apr;13(2):300-312
pubmed: 27298139
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Aug 22;16:112
pubmed: 27549581
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 May;26(5):481-497
pubmed: 28295821
Lancet. 2017 Apr 29;389(10080):1680-1681
pubmed: 28463129
J Patient Saf. 2017 Jun 30;:null
pubmed: 28671909
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):308-320
pubmed: 29248878
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Mar;66(3):602-608
pubmed: 29468640
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1199-1208
pubmed: 30073611