Secondary benefits of the families improving together (FIT) for weight loss trial on cognitive and social factors in African American adolescents.


Journal

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217089

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 05 2019
Historique:
received: 20 11 2018
accepted: 01 05 2019
entrez: 26 5 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 19 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although weight loss is an important primary outcome in obesity interventions, family-based interventions may have cascading ripple effects that extend to other aspects of health and well-being. Identifying these secondary benefits may be useful for understanding how to best engage underserved African American families in weight loss. The present research examines whether African American adolescents and parents perceive secondary benefits from participating in a family-based weight-loss intervention, including secondary health, social, or cognitive benefits. Qualitative data were obtained from families participating in the group-based intervention of the Families Improving Together (FIT) for Weight Loss trial. During the final week of the face-to-face motivational and family-based intervention program, families completed a guided open-ended group discussion about changes they experienced from participating (14 groups, N = 41 adolescents and 41 parents). Sessions were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded by independent pairs of raters using both inductive and deductive approaches. Guided by the multi-theoretical framework for the FIT trial, some themes were determined prior to coding using a deductive approach, including: (a) health outcomes (e.g., monitoring strategies for diet and physical activity), (b) social outcomes (e.g., involvement in family support, group support, autonomy support, family bonding, positive communication) and (c) cognitive outcomes (e.g., expression of self-confidence through self-efficacy, self-regulation, establishment of long-term goals). In addition to these pre-determined themes, the coding process included an inductive assessment, allowing for unexpected themes to surface as well around positive self-talk, relapse prevention, and monitoring strategies for different types of weight-related behaviors. Across both adolescents and parents, the cognitive outcomes were the most frequently discussed outcomes, including self-regulation, monitoring strategies for diet, establishing long-term goals, and ultimate relapse prevention. Parents made a greater number of comments about the social outcomes, including family support, group support, self-efficacy, and family connectedness, whereas adolescents made a greater number of comments about positive family communication. The results provide preliminary support for the positive secondary effects of weight loss programs on improving both cognitive and social well-being in underserved African American adolescents. ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT01796067. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01796067?term=NCT01796067&rank=1 The trial was registered on February 21, 2013 and the first participant was enrolled July 12, 2013.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although weight loss is an important primary outcome in obesity interventions, family-based interventions may have cascading ripple effects that extend to other aspects of health and well-being. Identifying these secondary benefits may be useful for understanding how to best engage underserved African American families in weight loss. The present research examines whether African American adolescents and parents perceive secondary benefits from participating in a family-based weight-loss intervention, including secondary health, social, or cognitive benefits.
METHODS
Qualitative data were obtained from families participating in the group-based intervention of the Families Improving Together (FIT) for Weight Loss trial. During the final week of the face-to-face motivational and family-based intervention program, families completed a guided open-ended group discussion about changes they experienced from participating (14 groups, N = 41 adolescents and 41 parents). Sessions were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded by independent pairs of raters using both inductive and deductive approaches. Guided by the multi-theoretical framework for the FIT trial, some themes were determined prior to coding using a deductive approach, including: (a) health outcomes (e.g., monitoring strategies for diet and physical activity), (b) social outcomes (e.g., involvement in family support, group support, autonomy support, family bonding, positive communication) and (c) cognitive outcomes (e.g., expression of self-confidence through self-efficacy, self-regulation, establishment of long-term goals). In addition to these pre-determined themes, the coding process included an inductive assessment, allowing for unexpected themes to surface as well around positive self-talk, relapse prevention, and monitoring strategies for different types of weight-related behaviors.
RESULTS
Across both adolescents and parents, the cognitive outcomes were the most frequently discussed outcomes, including self-regulation, monitoring strategies for diet, establishing long-term goals, and ultimate relapse prevention. Parents made a greater number of comments about the social outcomes, including family support, group support, self-efficacy, and family connectedness, whereas adolescents made a greater number of comments about positive family communication.
CONCLUSIONS
The results provide preliminary support for the positive secondary effects of weight loss programs on improving both cognitive and social well-being in underserved African American adolescents.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT01796067. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01796067?term=NCT01796067&rank=1 The trial was registered on February 21, 2013 and the first participant was enrolled July 12, 2013.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31126345
doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0806-5
pii: 10.1186/s12966-019-0806-5
pmc: PMC6534871
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01796067']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

47

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD072153
Pays : United States

Références

Eval Program Plann. 2015 Apr;49:106-16
pubmed: 25614139
Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Jul;35(7):891-8
pubmed: 20975725
Women Health. 2015;55(6):679-99
pubmed: 25909603
Pediatrics. 2018 Sep;142(3):
pubmed: 30177517
Health Psychol. 2006 Jul;25(4):510-20
pubmed: 16846326
Am J Health Behav. 2007 May-Jun;31(3):272-83
pubmed: 17402867
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Mar 20;53(4):399-404
pubmed: 30892641
Health Psychol. 2007 Sep;26(5):521-32
pubmed: 17845100
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Apr;88(4):1417-27
pubmed: 12679416
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Mar;35(2):164-70
pubmed: 18991981
Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Mar;27(2):240-9
pubmed: 17070638
Obes Rev. 2005 Feb;6(1):67-85
pubmed: 15655039
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Apr;43(2):180-189
pubmed: 28340546
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Feb 02;9:131-137
pubmed: 29616185
Int J Eat Disord. 2008 May;41(4):360-7
pubmed: 18318040
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1197-222
pubmed: 27182986
Am J Public Health. 2011 Oct;101(10):1907-13
pubmed: 21852659
Ethn Dis. 2016 Jul 21;26(3):295-304
pubmed: 27440968
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Feb;49(1):40-8
pubmed: 25559044
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jul;22(7):915-22
pubmed: 17415617
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 May;42:145-57
pubmed: 25835731
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1419-1429
pubmed: 28402773
Am Psychol. 2016 Oct;71(7):614-627
pubmed: 27690489
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 Apr;27(4):505-13
pubmed: 12664084
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Aug;53(2):280-6
pubmed: 23642973
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1917-22
pubmed: 23277558
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Apr;46(4):309-23
pubmed: 20307819
J Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Oct;38(9):997-1009
pubmed: 23685450
Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;29(1):91-101
pubmed: 20063940
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010 Sep;13(3):231-53
pubmed: 20689989
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Mar;21(3):598-601
pubmed: 23592669
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Dec;110(12):1830-9
pubmed: 21111093

Auteurs

Allison M Sweeney (AM)

Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Dawn K Wilson (DK)

Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. wilsondk@mailbox.sc.edu.

Haylee Loncar (H)

Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Asia Brown (A)

Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH